TSTP Solution File: SEU275+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU275+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.56s 2.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 37 ( 0 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_201,plain,
( well_ordering(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ antisymmetric(X1)
| ~ connected(X1)
| ~ transitive(X1)
| ~ well_founded_relation(X1)
| ~ reflexive(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_201) ).
cnf(i_0_724,lemma,
( well_founded_relation(inclusion_relation(X1))
| ~ ordinal(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_724) ).
cnf(i_0_287,plain,
relation(inclusion_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_287) ).
cnf(i_0_609,lemma,
reflexive(inclusion_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_609) ).
cnf(i_0_649,lemma,
transitive(inclusion_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_649) ).
cnf(i_0_706,lemma,
antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_706) ).
cnf(i_0_677,lemma,
( connected(inclusion_relation(X1))
| ~ ordinal(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_677) ).
cnf(i_0_738,negated_conjecture,
~ well_ordering(inclusion_relation(esk145_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_738) ).
cnf(i_0_739,negated_conjecture,
ordinal(esk145_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-x7l1cswq/lgb.p',i_0_739) ).
cnf(c_0_749,plain,
( well_ordering(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ antisymmetric(X1)
| ~ connected(X1)
| ~ transitive(X1)
| ~ well_founded_relation(X1)
| ~ reflexive(X1) ),
i_0_201 ).
cnf(c_0_750,lemma,
( well_founded_relation(inclusion_relation(X1))
| ~ ordinal(X1) ),
i_0_724 ).
cnf(c_0_751,plain,
relation(inclusion_relation(X1)),
i_0_287 ).
cnf(c_0_752,lemma,
reflexive(inclusion_relation(X1)),
i_0_609 ).
cnf(c_0_753,lemma,
transitive(inclusion_relation(X1)),
i_0_649 ).
cnf(c_0_754,lemma,
antisymmetric(inclusion_relation(X1)),
i_0_706 ).
cnf(c_0_755,lemma,
( connected(inclusion_relation(X1))
| ~ ordinal(X1) ),
i_0_677 ).
cnf(c_0_756,negated_conjecture,
~ well_ordering(inclusion_relation(esk145_0)),
i_0_738 ).
cnf(c_0_757,plain,
( well_ordering(inclusion_relation(X1))
| ~ ordinal(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_749,c_0_750]),c_0_751]),c_0_752]),c_0_753]),c_0_754])]),c_0_755]) ).
cnf(c_0_758,negated_conjecture,
ordinal(esk145_0),
i_0_739 ).
cnf(c_0_759,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_756,c_0_757]),c_0_758])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SEU275+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 03:07:16 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.56/2.49 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.56/2.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.56/2.49 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.56/2.49 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 7.56/2.49 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.56/2.49 #
% 7.56/2.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 7.56/2.49
% 7.56/2.49 # Proof found!
% 7.56/2.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.56/2.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.56/2.49 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.56/2.49
% 7.56/2.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.56/2.49 # User time : 0.037 s
% 7.56/2.49 # System time : 0.009 s
% 7.56/2.49 # Total time : 0.045 s
% 7.56/2.49 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.56/2.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------