TSTP Solution File: SEU264+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SEU264+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:40:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.64s 2.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   17 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  17 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_497,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xfrox549/lgb.p',i_0_497) ).

cnf(i_0_482,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk108_0,esk109_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xfrox549/lgb.p',i_0_482) ).

cnf(i_0_456,lemma,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xfrox549/lgb.p',i_0_456) ).

cnf(i_0_483,negated_conjecture,
    relation_of2_as_subset(esk111_0,esk110_0,esk108_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xfrox549/lgb.p',i_0_483) ).

cnf(i_0_474,lemma,
    ( relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xfrox549/lgb.p',i_0_474) ).

cnf(i_0_481,negated_conjecture,
    ~ relation_of2_as_subset(esk111_0,esk110_0,esk109_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xfrox549/lgb.p',i_0_481) ).

cnf(c_0_504,lemma,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_497 ).

cnf(c_0_505,negated_conjecture,
    subset(esk108_0,esk109_0),
    i_0_482 ).

cnf(c_0_506,lemma,
    ( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X3,X2) ),
    i_0_456 ).

cnf(c_0_507,negated_conjecture,
    relation_of2_as_subset(esk111_0,esk110_0,esk108_0),
    i_0_483 ).

cnf(c_0_508,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk109_0)
    | ~ subset(X1,esk108_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_504,c_0_505]) ).

cnf(c_0_509,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_rng(esk111_0),esk108_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_506,c_0_507]) ).

cnf(c_0_510,lemma,
    ( relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),X3) ),
    i_0_474 ).

cnf(c_0_511,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_rng(esk111_0),esk109_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_508,c_0_509]) ).

cnf(c_0_512,negated_conjecture,
    ( relation_of2_as_subset(esk111_0,X1,esk109_0)
    | ~ relation_of2_as_subset(esk111_0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_510,c_0_511]) ).

cnf(c_0_513,negated_conjecture,
    ~ relation_of2_as_subset(esk111_0,esk110_0,esk109_0),
    i_0_481 ).

cnf(c_0_514,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_512,c_0_507]),c_0_513]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU264+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:23:40 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.47  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.47  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.64/2.54  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.64/2.54  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.64/2.54  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.64/2.54  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S02CN
% 7.64/2.54  # and selection function SelectAntiRROptimalLit.
% 7.64/2.54  #
% 7.64/2.54  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 7.64/2.54  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.64/2.54  
% 7.64/2.54  # Proof found!
% 7.64/2.54  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.64/2.54  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.64/2.54  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.64/2.54  
% 7.64/2.54  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.64/2.54  # User time                : 0.038 s
% 7.64/2.54  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 7.64/2.54  # Total time               : 0.045 s
% 7.64/2.54  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.64/2.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------