TSTP Solution File: SEU240+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU240+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:20:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.54s 0.69s
% Output   : Refutation 0.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  10 unt;   9 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   61 (   0 equ;  27 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ transitive(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d16_relat_2) ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | transitive(X)
    | ~ is_transitive_in(X,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d16_relat_2) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | ~ in(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,Y)
    | ~ in(V,Y)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Z,U),X)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(U,V),X)
    | in(ordered_pair(Z,V),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW1'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW2'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAW3'(Y,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | is_transitive_in(X,Y)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW1'(Y,X),'SKOLEMAAAW3'(Y,X)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_relat_2) ).

cnf(18,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAW5'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_wellord1) ).

cnf(19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW6','SKOLEMAAAW7'),'SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_wellord1) ).

cnf(20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW7','SKOLEMAAAW8'),'SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_wellord1) ).

cnf(21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW6','SKOLEMAAAW8'),'SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_wellord1) ).

cnf(22,negated_conjecture,
    ( transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X,Y),'SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Y,Z),'SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | in(ordered_pair(X,Z),'SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l2_wellord1) ).

cnf(32,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Y,Z),X)
    | in(Y,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_relat_1) ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(Y,Z),X)
    | in(Z,relation_field(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t30_relat_1) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ( is_transitive_in('SKOLEMAAAW5',X)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW1'(X,'SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAW5')),'SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,18]) ).

cnf(70,plain,
    ( is_transitive_in('SKOLEMAAAW5',X)
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW2'(X,'SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW3'(X,'SKOLEMAAAW5')),'SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[11,18]) ).

cnf(116,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW5')),'SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,66,18]) ).

cnf(119,plain,
    ( in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW2'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW3'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW5')),'SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,70,18]) ).

cnf(137,plain,
    ( transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW1'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW3'(relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5'),'SKOLEMAAAW5')),'SKOLEMAAAW5') ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[22,119,116]) ).

cnf(139,plain,
    ( transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5')
    | is_transitive_in('SKOLEMAAAW5',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5')) ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,137,18]) ).

cnf(141,plain,
    transitive('SKOLEMAAAW5'),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[3,139,18]) ).

cnf(142,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW6','SKOLEMAAAW7'),'SKOLEMAAAW5'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[19,141]) ).

cnf(143,plain,
    in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW7','SKOLEMAAAW8'),'SKOLEMAAAW5'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[20,141]) ).

cnf(144,plain,
    ~ in(ordered_pair('SKOLEMAAAW6','SKOLEMAAAW8'),'SKOLEMAAAW5'),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[21,141]) ).

cnf(146,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAW7',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[33,142,18]) ).

cnf(147,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAW6',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[32,142,18]) ).

cnf(150,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAW8',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[33,143,18]) ).

cnf(163,plain,
    ~ is_transitive_in('SKOLEMAAAW5',relation_field('SKOLEMAAAW5')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,150,18,147,146,142,143,144]) ).

cnf(171,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[2,141,18]),163]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU240+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 01:10:18 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.47  * 
% 0.21/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  "."
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-20T01:10:18
% 0.21/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n021.cluster.edu at 2022-06-20T01:10:18
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|unordered_pair| ?X ?Y) (|unordered_pair| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.21/0.50  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (= (|set_union2| ?X ?Y) (|set_union2| ?Y ?X)).
% 0.21/0.50  ; Recognized right identity assertion (= (|set_union2| ?X |empty_set|) ?X).
% 0.21/0.50  ; Declaring unordered_pair to be commutative.
% 0.21/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.21/0.50     |one_to_one| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.21/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.21/0.50     |function| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.54/0.69  ; Declaring set_union2 to be commutative.
% 0.54/0.69  
% 0.54/0.69  #||
% 0.54/0.69  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.54/0.69  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.54/0.69  ||#
% 0.54/0.69  
% 0.54/0.69  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.54/0.69  ;       490 formulas have been input or derived (from 133 formulas).
% 0.54/0.69  ;       171 (35%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.54/0.69  ;           25 (15%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.54/0.69  ;          146 (85%) are still being kept.
% 0.54/0.69  ; 
% 0.54/0.69  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.006   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.002   1%   Assert                       (37 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.010   5%   Process new row              (410 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.148  71%   Resolution                   (264 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.002   1%   Paramodulation               (132 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (47 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.002   1%   Condensing                   (127 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.005   2%   Forward subsumption          (127 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.001   0%   Backward subsumption         (83 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (51 calls)
% 0.54/0.69  ;     0.003   1%   Forward simplification       (401 calls)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     0.001   0%   Backward simplification      (171 calls)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     0.001   0%   Ordering                     (201 calls)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     0.028  13%   Other
% 0.54/0.70  ;     0.209        Total
% 0.54/0.70  ;     0.213        Real time
% 0.54/0.70  ; 
% 0.54/0.70  ; Term-hash-array has 303 terms in all.
% 0.54/0.70  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 61 entries (80 at peak, 83 added, 22 deleted).
% 0.54/0.70  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 235 nodes (336 at peak, 342 added, 107 deleted).
% 0.54/0.70  ;  Retrieved 58 possibly forward subsuming rows in 127 calls.
% 0.54/0.70  ;  Retrieved 5 possibly backward subsumed rows in 83 calls.
% 0.54/0.70  ; Path-index has 290 entries (290 at peak, 333 added, 43 deleted).
% 0.54/0.70  ; Path-index has 836 nodes (836 at peak, 890 added, 54 deleted).
% 0.54/0.70  ; Trie-index has 290 entries (290 at peak, 333 added, 43 deleted).
% 0.54/0.70  ; Trie-index has 1,145 nodes (1,145 at peak, 1,262 added, 117 deleted).
% 0.54/0.70  ; Retrieved 413 generalization terms in 735 calls.
% 0.54/0.70  ; Retrieved 89 instance terms in 87 calls.
% 0.54/0.70  ; Retrieved 159,505 unifiable terms in 21,091 calls.
% 0.54/0.70  ; 
% 0.54/0.70  ; The agenda of rows to give has 33 entries:
% 0.54/0.70  ;    13 with value (4 8)           1 with value (4 22)           1 with value (4 30)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     1 with value (4 9)           1 with value (4 23)           1 with value (4 31)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     1 with value (4 11)          1 with value (4 24)           2 with value (4 34)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     4 with value (4 12)          2 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 35)
% 0.54/0.70  ;     2 with value (4 17)          1 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 36)
% 0.54/0.70  Evaluation took:
% 0.54/0.70    0.213 seconds of real time
% 0.54/0.70    0.19825 seconds of user run time
% 0.54/0.70    0.014836 seconds of system run time
% 0.54/0.70    [Run times include 0.006 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.54/0.70    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.54/0.70    0 page faults and
% 0.54/0.70    15,294,232 bytes consed.
% 0.54/0.70  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.54/0.70  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-20T01:10:18
% 0.54/0.70  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.54/0.70  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------