TSTP Solution File: SEU234+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU234+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:18:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.40s 29.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  103 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  109 (  38   ~;  43   |;  18   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   2 sgn  23   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t31_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
         => ( ordinal(X2)
            & subset(X2,X1) ) )
     => ordinal(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t31_ordinal1) ).

fof(d2_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
         => subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d2_ordinal1) ).

fof(cc2_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
        & epsilon_connected(X1) )
     => ordinal(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cc2_ordinal1) ).

fof(d3_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( epsilon_connected(X1)
    <=> ! [X2,X3] :
          ~ ( in(X2,X1)
            & in(X3,X1)
            & ~ in(X2,X3)
            & X2 != X3
            & ~ in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_ordinal1) ).

fof(t24_ordinal1,lemma,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ordinal(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ordinal(X2)
         => ~ ( ~ in(X1,X2)
              & X1 != X2
              & ~ in(X2,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t24_ordinal1) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X1)
           => ( ordinal(X2)
              & subset(X2,X1) ) )
       => ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t31_ordinal1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X3,X4,X3] :
      ( ( ~ epsilon_transitive(X3)
        | ~ in(X4,X3)
        | subset(X4,X3) )
      & ( in(esk10_1(X3),X3)
        | epsilon_transitive(X3) )
      & ( ~ subset(esk10_1(X3),X3)
        | epsilon_transitive(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_ordinal1])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ( ordinal(X4)
        | ~ in(X4,esk1_0) )
      & ( subset(X4,esk1_0)
        | ~ in(X4,esk1_0) )
      & ~ ordinal(esk1_0) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ epsilon_transitive(X2)
      | ~ epsilon_connected(X2)
      | ordinal(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc2_ordinal1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
    | ~ subset(esk10_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(X1,esk1_0)
    | ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( epsilon_transitive(X1)
    | in(esk10_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4] :
      ( ( ~ epsilon_connected(X4)
        | ~ in(X5,X4)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X5,X6)
        | X5 = X6
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk8_1(X4),X4)
        | epsilon_connected(X4) )
      & ( in(esk9_1(X4),X4)
        | epsilon_connected(X4) )
      & ( ~ in(esk8_1(X4),esk9_1(X4))
        | epsilon_connected(X4) )
      & ( esk8_1(X4) != esk9_1(X4)
        | epsilon_connected(X4) )
      & ( ~ in(esk9_1(X4),esk8_1(X4))
        | epsilon_connected(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d3_ordinal1])])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ordinal(X1)
    | ~ epsilon_connected(X1)
    | ~ epsilon_transitive(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    epsilon_transitive(esk1_0),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ordinal(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_16,lemma,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ ordinal(X3)
      | ~ ordinal(X4)
      | in(X3,X4)
      | X3 = X4
      | in(X4,X3) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t24_ordinal1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal(X1)
    | ~ in(X1,esk1_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( epsilon_connected(X1)
    | in(esk8_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ epsilon_connected(esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,lemma,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 = X1
    | in(X2,X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk8_1(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( epsilon_connected(X1)
    | in(esk9_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,lemma,
    ( X1 = esk8_1(esk1_0)
    | in(esk8_1(esk1_0),X1)
    | in(X1,esk8_1(esk1_0))
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(esk9_1(esk1_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_22]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( epsilon_connected(X1)
    | ~ in(esk9_1(X1),esk8_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk9_1(esk1_0) = esk8_1(esk1_0)
    | in(esk9_1(esk1_0),esk8_1(esk1_0))
    | in(esk8_1(esk1_0),esk9_1(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( epsilon_connected(X1)
    | ~ in(esk8_1(X1),esk9_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( esk9_1(esk1_0) = esk8_1(esk1_0)
    | in(esk8_1(esk1_0),esk9_1(esk1_0)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( epsilon_connected(X1)
    | esk8_1(X1) != esk9_1(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    esk9_1(esk1_0) = esk8_1(esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : SEU234+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 20:14:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.37/23.42  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/23.43  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.37/23.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/29.59  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.40/29.59  
% 0.40/29.59  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 0.40/29.59  # OLD status Res
% 0.40/29.59  # Preprocessing time       : 0.046 s
% 0.40/29.59  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 0.40/29.59  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 0.40/29.59  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.40/29.59  
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof found!
% 0.40/29.59  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.40/29.59  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object total steps             : 32
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object clause steps            : 21
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object conjectures             : 14
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 11
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 12
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object generating inferences   : 9
% 0.40/29.59  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 0.40/29.59  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.40/29.59  # Parsed axioms                        : 270
% 0.40/29.59  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 169
% 0.40/29.59  # Initial clauses                      : 211
% 0.40/29.59  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.40/29.59  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 207
% 0.40/29.59  # Processed clauses                    : 14301
% 0.40/29.59  # ...of these trivial                  : 67
% 0.40/29.59  # ...subsumed                          : 8641
% 0.40/29.59  # ...remaining for further processing  : 5593
% 0.40/29.59  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 55
% 0.40/29.59  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.40/29.59  # Backward-subsumed                    : 213
% 0.40/29.59  # Backward-rewritten                   : 985
% 0.40/29.59  # Generated clauses                    : 170824
% 0.40/29.59  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 161858
% 0.40/29.59  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3904
% 0.40/29.59  # Paramodulations                      : 166669
% 0.40/29.59  # Factorizations                       : 16
% 0.40/29.59  # Equation resolutions                 : 388
% 0.40/29.59  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4383
% 0.40/29.59  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 345
% 0.40/29.59  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.40/29.59  #    Negative unit clauses             : 296
% 0.40/29.59  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3741
% 0.40/29.59  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 109642
% 0.40/29.59  # ...number of literals in the above   : 639407
% 0.40/29.59  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.40/29.59  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1207
% 0.40/29.59  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6801934
% 0.40/29.59  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2839220
% 0.40/29.59  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 10851
% 0.40/29.59  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 631991
% 0.40/29.59  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.40/29.59  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 408
% 0.40/29.59  # BW rewrite match successes           : 293
% 0.40/29.59  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.40/29.59  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.40/29.59  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2563103
% 0.40/29.59  
% 0.40/29.59  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.40/29.59  # User time                : 5.319 s
% 0.40/29.59  # System time              : 0.081 s
% 0.40/29.59  # Total time               : 5.400 s
% 0.40/29.59  # Maximum resident set size: 122992 pages
% 0.40/46.44  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/46.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/46.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.40/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.inCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.49  
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.40/46.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.51  eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.pCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.51  
% 0.40/46.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.51  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.40/46.51  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/46.51  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------