TSTP Solution File: SEU224+2 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU224+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.47s 2.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 6 unt; 4 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 42 ( 0 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_441,lemma,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83fmb9s3/lgb.p',i_0_441) ).
cnf(i_0_253,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk57_0,esk56_0)
| in(esk57_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk58_0,esk56_0))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83fmb9s3/lgb.p',i_0_253) ).
cnf(i_0_257,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk58_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83fmb9s3/lgb.p',i_0_257) ).
cnf(i_0_255,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk57_0,esk56_0)
| ~ in(esk57_0,relation_dom(esk58_0))
| ~ in(esk57_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk58_0,esk56_0))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83fmb9s3/lgb.p',i_0_255) ).
cnf(i_0_439,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3)))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83fmb9s3/lgb.p',i_0_439) ).
cnf(i_0_254,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk57_0,relation_dom(esk58_0))
| in(esk57_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk58_0,esk56_0))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83fmb9s3/lgb.p',i_0_254) ).
cnf(i_0_440,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-83fmb9s3/lgb.p',i_0_440) ).
cnf(c_0_449,lemma,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X2))) ),
i_0_441 ).
cnf(c_0_450,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk57_0,esk56_0)
| in(esk57_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk58_0,esk56_0))) ),
i_0_253 ).
cnf(c_0_451,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk58_0),
i_0_257 ).
cnf(c_0_452,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk57_0,esk56_0)
| ~ in(esk57_0,relation_dom(esk58_0))
| ~ in(esk57_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk58_0,esk56_0))) ),
i_0_255 ).
cnf(c_0_453,negated_conjecture,
in(esk57_0,esk56_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_449,c_0_450]),c_0_451])]) ).
cnf(c_0_454,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk57_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk58_0,esk56_0)))
| ~ in(esk57_0,relation_dom(esk58_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_452,c_0_453])]) ).
cnf(c_0_455,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3)))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(X2)) ),
i_0_439 ).
cnf(c_0_456,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk57_0,relation_dom(esk58_0))
| in(esk57_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk58_0,esk56_0))) ),
i_0_254 ).
cnf(c_0_457,lemma,
~ in(esk57_0,relation_dom(esk58_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_454,c_0_455]),c_0_451]),c_0_453])]) ).
cnf(c_0_458,lemma,
( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X3))) ),
i_0_440 ).
cnf(c_0_459,negated_conjecture,
in(esk57_0,relation_dom(relation_dom_restriction(esk58_0,esk56_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_456,c_0_457]) ).
cnf(c_0_460,lemma,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_458,c_0_459]),c_0_451])]),c_0_457]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SEU224+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 12:24:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 8.47/2.61 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.47/2.61 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.47/2.61 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.47/2.61 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___300_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 8.47/2.61 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.47/2.61 #
% 8.47/2.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 8.47/2.61
% 8.47/2.61 # Proof found!
% 8.47/2.61 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.47/2.61 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.47/2.61 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.47/2.61
% 8.47/2.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.47/2.61 # User time : 0.035 s
% 8.47/2.61 # System time : 0.004 s
% 8.47/2.61 # Total time : 0.039 s
% 8.47/2.61 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.47/2.61
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------