TSTP Solution File: SEU200+2 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : SEU200+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 11:53:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 61.75s 8.27s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : SEU200+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:31:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 61.75/8.27 % SZS status Theorem
% 61.75/8.27 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 61.75/8.27 relation(sK97)).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c1, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 relation(sK97),
% 61.75/8.27 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 61.75/8.27
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 61.75/8.27 subset(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1),X1) | ~relation(X1)).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 61.75/8.27 sK97 = X1).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c3, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 $false,
% 61.75/8.27 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c4, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 subset(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1),X1),
% 61.75/8.27 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 61.75/8.27
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 61.75/8.27 subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_rng(X3)) | ~subset(X2,X3) | ~relation(X3) | ~relation(X2)).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 61.75/8.27 relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1) = X2).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 61.75/8.27 X1 = X3).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c6, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 $false,
% 61.75/8.27 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c7, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_rng(X3)) | ~relation(X3) | ~relation(X2),
% 61.75/8.27 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a1, a2])], [c4, c5])).
% 61.75/8.27
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c8, axiom,
% 61.75/8.27 ~subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK96,sK97)),relation_rng(sK97))).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 61.75/8.27 relation_rng(X2) = relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK96,sK97))).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 61.75/8.27 relation_rng(X3) = relation_rng(sK97)).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c9, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 ~relation(X3) | ~relation(X2),
% 61.75/8.27 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4])], [c7, c8])).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c10, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 $false,
% 61.75/8.27 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4])], [c7, c8])).
% 61.75/8.27
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c11, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 relation(sK97)).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 61.75/8.27 X3 = sK97).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c12, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 ~relation(X2),
% 61.75/8.27 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a5])], [c9, c11])).
% 61.75/8.27
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c13, axiom,
% 61.75/8.27 relation(relation_rng_restriction(X4,X5)) | ~relation(X5)).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(a6, assumption,
% 61.75/8.27 X2 = relation_rng_restriction(X4,X5)).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c14, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 $false,
% 61.75/8.27 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c12, c13])).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c15, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 ~relation(X5),
% 61.75/8.27 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6])], [c12, c13])).
% 61.75/8.27
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c16, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 relation(sK97)).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(a7, assumption,
% 61.75/8.27 X5 = sK97).
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c17, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 $false,
% 61.75/8.27 inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a7])], [c15, c16])).
% 61.75/8.27
% 61.75/8.27 cnf(c18, plain,
% 61.75/8.27 $false,
% 61.75/8.27 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 61.75/8.27 bind(X0, sK96),
% 61.75/8.27 bind(X1, sK97),
% 61.75/8.27 bind(X2, relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),
% 61.75/8.27 bind(X3, sK97),
% 61.75/8.27 bind(X4, sK96),
% 61.75/8.27 bind(X5, sK97)
% 61.75/8.27 ],
% 61.75/8.27 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7])).
% 61.75/8.27
% 61.75/8.27 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------