%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU200+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.75s 1.92s
% Output   : Refutation 1.75s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : SEU200+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 13:25:03 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.75/1.92  
% 1.75/1.92  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.75/1.92  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.75/1.92  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.75/1.92  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.75/1.92  SPASS derived 137 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 387 clauses.
% 1.75/1.92  SPASS allocated 105838 KBytes.
% 1.75/1.92  SPASS spent	0:00:01.56 on the problem.
% 1.75/1.92  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 1.75/1.92  		0:00:01.45 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.75/1.92  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 1.75/1.92  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 1.75/1.92  		0:00:00.03 for the reduction.
% 1.75/1.92  
% 1.75/1.92  
% 1.75/1.92  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 :
% 1.75/1.92  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.75/1.92  1[0:Inp] ||  -> relation(skc6)*.
% 1.75/1.92  65[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> relation(relation_rng_restriction(v,u))*.
% 1.75/1.92  73[0:Inp] || subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(skc7,skc6)),relation_rng(skc6))*l -> .
% 1.75/1.92  85[0:Inp] relation(u) ||  -> subset(relation_rng_restriction(v,u),u)*l.
% 1.75/1.92  238[0:Inp] relation(u) relation(v) || subset(v,u) -> subset(relation_rng(v),relation_rng(u))*.
% 1.75/1.92  407[0:Res:1.0,85.0] ||  -> subset(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc6),skc6)*l.
% 1.75/1.92  432[0:Res:1.0,65.0] ||  -> relation(relation_rng_restriction(u,skc6))*.
% 1.75/1.92  489[0:Res:238.3,73.0] relation(relation_rng_restriction(skc7,skc6)) relation(skc6) || subset(relation_rng_restriction(skc7,skc6),skc6)*l -> .
% 1.75/1.92  492[0:MRR:489.0,489.1,489.2,432.0,1.0,407.0] ||  -> .
% 1.75/1.92  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.75/1.92  Formulae used in the proof : t118_relat_1 dt_k8_relat_1 t117_relat_1 t25_relat_1
% 1.75/1.92  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------