TSTP Solution File: SEU200+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SEU200+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:04:57 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.67s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> subset(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t117_relat_1) ).
fof(f25,conjecture,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),relation_rng(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t118_relat_1) ).
fof(f26,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),relation_rng(X1)) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
! [X0] :
( relation(X0)
=> ! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ( subset(X0,X1)
=> ( subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_rng(X1))
& subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_dom(X1)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t25_relat_1) ).
fof(f39,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
fof(f47,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),relation_rng(X1))
& relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).
fof(f50,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_rng(X1))
& subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_dom(X1)) )
| ~ subset(X0,X1)
| ~ relation(X1) )
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_rng(X1))
& subset(relation_dom(X0),relation_dom(X1)) )
| ~ subset(X0,X1)
| ~ relation(X1) )
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f50]) ).
fof(f74,plain,
( ? [X0,X1] :
( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1)),relation_rng(X1))
& relation(X1) )
=> ( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK7,sK8)),relation_rng(sK8))
& relation(sK8) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f75,plain,
( ~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK7,sK8)),relation_rng(sK8))
& relation(sK8) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK7,sK8])],[f48,f74]) ).
fof(f79,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( relation(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).
fof(f102,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(relation_rng_restriction(X0,X1),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
relation(sK8),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f104,plain,
~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK7,sK8)),relation_rng(sK8)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f107,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_rng(X1))
| ~ subset(X0,X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51]) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
( ~ relation(X0)
| relation(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).
cnf(c_74,plain,
( ~ relation(X0)
| subset(relation_rng_restriction(X1,X0),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f102]) ).
cnf(c_75,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(relation_rng(relation_rng_restriction(sK7,sK8)),relation_rng(sK8)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).
cnf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK8),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).
cnf(c_78,plain,
( ~ subset(X0,X1)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ relation(X1)
| subset(relation_rng(X0),relation_rng(X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f107]) ).
cnf(c_1104,plain,
relation_rng_restriction(sK7,sK8) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1105,plain,
relation_rng(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1106,plain,
relation_rng(sK8) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_1107,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK8),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_76]) ).
cnf(c_1108,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_75,c_1106,c_1104,c_1105]) ).
cnf(c_1812,plain,
( ~ relation(sK8)
| relation(sP0_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1104,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_1813,plain,
relation(sP0_iProver_def),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1812,c_1107]) ).
cnf(c_1867,plain,
( ~ relation(sK8)
| subset(sP0_iProver_def,sK8) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1104,c_74]) ).
cnf(c_1868,plain,
subset(sP0_iProver_def,sK8),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1867,c_1107]) ).
cnf(c_1984,plain,
( ~ subset(X0,sK8)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ relation(sK8)
| subset(relation_rng(X0),sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1106,c_78]) ).
cnf(c_1995,plain,
( ~ subset(X0,sK8)
| ~ relation(X0)
| subset(relation_rng(X0),sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1984,c_1107]) ).
cnf(c_2099,plain,
( ~ subset(sP0_iProver_def,sK8)
| ~ relation(sP0_iProver_def)
| subset(sP1_iProver_def,sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1105,c_1995]) ).
cnf(c_2100,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2099,c_1108,c_1813,c_1868]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU200+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 17:57:13 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.67/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.67/1.18 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.67/1.18 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.67/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Parsing...
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 clauses 41
% 2.67/1.18 conjectures 2
% 2.67/1.18 EPR 20
% 2.67/1.18 Horn 39
% 2.67/1.18 unary 18
% 2.67/1.18 binary 15
% 2.67/1.18 lits 74
% 2.67/1.18 lits eq 5
% 2.67/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 2.67/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 2.67/1.18 fd_cond 1
% 2.67/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 1
% 2.67/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------
% 2.67/1.18 Current options:
% 2.67/1.18 ------
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.67/1.18
% 2.67/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------