TSTP Solution File: SEU196+2 by SRASS---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SRASS---0.1
% Problem  : SEU196+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s

% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 01:40:19 EST 2010

% Result   : Theorem 2.27s
% Output   : Solution 2.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17524/SEU196+2.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM       ... 
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17524/SEU196+2.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17524/SEU196+2.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p 
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC  time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 17620
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% # Preprocessing time     : 0.042 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(1, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(relation(X1)=>relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', dt_k7_relat_1)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(relation(X2)=>subset(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X2)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t88_relat_1)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:(relation(X1)=>![X2]:(relation(X2)=>(subset(X1,X2)=>(subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_dom(X2))&subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2)))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t25_relat_1)).
% fof(187, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:(relation(X2)=>subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)),relation_rng(X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t99_relat_1)).
% fof(188, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:(relation(X2)=>subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)),relation_rng(X2)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[187])).
% fof(215, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(relation(X1))|relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[1])).
% fof(216, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(relation(X3))|relation(relation_dom_restriction(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[215])).
% cnf(217,plain,(relation(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2))|~relation(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[216])).
% fof(223, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(~(relation(X2))|subset(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1),X2)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(224, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(~(relation(X4))|subset(relation_dom_restriction(X4,X3),X4)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[223])).
% cnf(225,plain,(subset(relation_dom_restriction(X1,X2),X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[224])).
% fof(226, plain,![X1]:(~(relation(X1))|![X2]:(~(relation(X2))|(~(subset(X1,X2))|(subset(relation_dom(X1),relation_dom(X2))&subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(227, plain,![X3]:(~(relation(X3))|![X4]:(~(relation(X4))|(~(subset(X3,X4))|(subset(relation_dom(X3),relation_dom(X4))&subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_rng(X4)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[226])).
% fof(228, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(relation(X4))|(~(subset(X3,X4))|(subset(relation_dom(X3),relation_dom(X4))&subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_rng(X4)))))|~(relation(X3))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[227])).
% fof(229, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((((subset(relation_dom(X3),relation_dom(X4))|~(subset(X3,X4)))|~(relation(X4)))|~(relation(X3)))&(((subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_rng(X4))|~(subset(X3,X4)))|~(relation(X4)))|~(relation(X3)))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[228])).
% cnf(230,plain,(subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_rng(X2))|~relation(X1)|~relation(X2)|~subset(X1,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[229])).
% fof(959, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:(relation(X2)&~(subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X2,X1)),relation_rng(X2)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[188])).
% fof(960, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:?[X4]:(relation(X4)&~(subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(X4,X3)),relation_rng(X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[959])).
% fof(961, negated_conjecture,(relation(esk61_0)&~(subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0)),relation_rng(esk61_0)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[960])).
% cnf(962,negated_conjecture,(~subset(relation_rng(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0)),relation_rng(esk61_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[961])).
% cnf(963,negated_conjecture,(relation(esk61_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[961])).
% cnf(1271,negated_conjecture,(~subset(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0),esk61_0)|~relation(esk61_0)|~relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0))),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[962,230,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1280,negated_conjecture,(~subset(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0),esk61_0)|$false|~relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0))),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[1271,963,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(1281,negated_conjecture,(~subset(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0),esk61_0)|~relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[1280,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4989,negated_conjecture,(~relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0))|~relation(esk61_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1281,225,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4990,negated_conjecture,(~relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0))|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[4989,963,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4991,negated_conjecture,(~relation(relation_dom_restriction(esk61_0,esk60_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[4990,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4994,negated_conjecture,(~relation(esk61_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[4991,217,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4995,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[4994,963,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4996,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[4995,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4997,negated_conjecture,($false),4996,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses                  : 603
% # ...of these trivial                : 3
% # ...subsumed                        : 21
% # ...remaining for further processing: 579
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 54
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed                  : 0
% # Backward-rewritten                 : 0
% # Generated clauses                  : 3469
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 3240
% # Contextual simplify-reflections    : 6
% # Paramodulations                    : 3381
% # Factorizations                     : 14
% # Equation resolutions               : 74
% # Current number of processed clauses: 287
% #    Positive orientable unit clauses: 31
% #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% #    Negative unit clauses           : 8
% #    Non-unit-clauses                : 245
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3233
% # ...number of literals in the above : 14116
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4062
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1579
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound  : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts        : 62
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes       : 51
% # Backwards rewriting index:   303 leaves,   1.70+/-2.770 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index:          125 leaves,   1.23+/-0.922 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index:          273 leaves,   1.52+/-2.036 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time              : 0.207 s
% # System time            : 0.009 s
% # Total time             : 0.216 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.40 CPU 0.48 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.40 CPU 0.48 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP17524/SEU196+2.tptp
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------