TSTP Solution File: SEU191+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU191+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 2.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 43 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 216 ( 46 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 38 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 304 ( 131 ~; 142 |; 18 &)
% ( 6 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 4 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 111 ( 12 sgn 38 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d10_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> ( in(X3,X1)
& X3 = X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d10_relat_1) ).
fof(d8_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ! [X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( X3 = relation_composition(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4,X5] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
<=> ? [X6] :
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1)
& in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2) ) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d8_relat_1) ).
fof(t74_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(X1,X3)
& in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t74_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X7,X8] :
( ( in(X7,X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( X7 = X8
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X7,X5)
| X7 != X8
| in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X5,X6),esk10_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| ~ in(esk9_2(X5,X6),X5)
| esk9_2(X5,X6) != esk10_2(X5,X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(esk9_2(X5,X6),X5)
| in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X5,X6),esk10_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( esk9_2(X5,X6) = esk10_2(X5,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X5,X6),esk10_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X10,X11,X13,X16] :
( ( in(ordered_pair(X10,esk5_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11)),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk5_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X11),X11),X8)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X10,X13),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X13,X11),X8)
| in(ordered_pair(X10,X11),X9)
| X9 != relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X7,X8,X9),esk7_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X7,X8,X9),X16),X7)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X16,esk7_3(X7,X8,X9)),X8)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X7,X8,X9),esk8_3(X7,X8,X9)),X7)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X7,X8,X9),esk7_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk8_3(X7,X8,X9),esk7_3(X7,X8,X9)),X8)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_3(X7,X8,X9),esk7_3(X7,X8,X9)),X9)
| X9 = relation_composition(X7,X8)
| ~ relation(X9)
| ~ relation(X8)
| ~ relation(X7) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( relation(X4)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),relation_composition(identity_relation(X3),X4))
<=> ( in(X1,X3)
& in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t74_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X3 = X4
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X4,esk5_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X2] : relation(identity_relation(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk4_0)
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) )
& ( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) )
& ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( esk5_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) = X4
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| X1 != identity_relation(X6)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X3 != relation_composition(X4,X5)
| X4 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X6),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk5_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),X5),X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( esk5_5(identity_relation(X1),X2,X3,X4,X5) = X4
| X3 != relation_composition(identity_relation(X1),X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| in(esk1_0,X1)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0) != relation_composition(X2,X3)
| X2 != identity_relation(X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk4_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
| X4 != relation_composition(identity_relation(X5),X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| in(esk1_0,X1)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0) != relation_composition(X2,X3)
| X2 != identity_relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0) != relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(X2)
| X3 != X4
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| in(esk1_0,X1)
| identity_relation(esk3_0) != identity_relation(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),c_0_14]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
| relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0) != relation_composition(identity_relation(X2),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X2)
| X2 != identity_relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
in(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X3)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| X3 != relation_composition(X1,X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X6,X5),X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X6),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(esk3_0)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0)
| ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,esk2_0),X2)
| X2 != relation_composition(X3,esk4_0)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,esk1_0),X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0),identity_relation(esk3_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk4_0) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),X1)
| X1 != relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_33])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
~ relation(relation_composition(identity_relation(esk3_0),esk4_0)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]),c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU191+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 00:40:46 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/2.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/2.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/2.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.25/2.42
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof found!
% 0.25/2.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/2.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object total steps : 43
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object clause steps : 32
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object conjectures : 22
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 19
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 17
% 0.25/2.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 30
% 0.25/2.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/2.42 # Parsed axioms : 31
% 0.25/2.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 15
% 0.25/2.42 # Initial clauses : 33
% 0.25/2.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/2.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.25/2.42 # Processed clauses : 8614
% 0.25/2.42 # ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.25/2.42 # ...subsumed : 7213
% 0.25/2.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 1390
% 0.25/2.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.25/2.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/2.42 # Backward-subsumed : 189
% 0.25/2.42 # Backward-rewritten : 354
% 0.25/2.42 # Generated clauses : 36452
% 0.25/2.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 36356
% 0.25/2.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 14848
% 0.25/2.42 # Paramodulations : 36117
% 0.25/2.42 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.25/2.42 # Equation resolutions : 333
% 0.25/2.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 846
% 0.25/2.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.25/2.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/2.42 # Negative unit clauses : 34
% 0.25/2.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 793
% 0.25/2.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 13040
% 0.25/2.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 122398
% 0.25/2.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/2.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 543
% 0.25/2.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1787321
% 0.25/2.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 268030
% 0.25/2.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 19708
% 0.25/2.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6759
% 0.25/2.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/2.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 38
% 0.25/2.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.25/2.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/2.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/2.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 985008
% 0.25/2.42
% 0.25/2.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/2.42 # User time : 1.604 s
% 0.25/2.42 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.25/2.42 # Total time : 1.617 s
% 0.25/2.42 # Maximum resident set size: 18328 pages
% 0.26/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.45 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------