TSTP Solution File: SEU190+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU190+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.34s 22.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 57 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 207 ( 56 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 26 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 242 ( 92 ~; 115 |; 21 &)
% ( 8 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 16 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 138 ( 16 sgn 54 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d10_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( X2 = identity_relation(X1)
<=> ! [X3,X4] :
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X2)
<=> ( in(X3,X1)
& X3 = X4 ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d10_relat_1) ).
fof(d4_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_dom(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d4_relat_1) ).
fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> in(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).
fof(d5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( X2 = relation_rng(X1)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X2)
<=> ? [X4] : in(ordered_pair(X4,X3),X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d5_relat_1) ).
fof(dt_k6_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] : relation(identity_relation(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k6_relat_1) ).
fof(t20_relat_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( relation(X3)
=> ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),X3)
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
& in(X2,relation_rng(X3)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t20_relat_1) ).
fof(d10_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( X1 = X2
<=> ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X1) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d10_xboole_0) ).
fof(t71_relat_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1
& relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t71_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X7,X8] :
( ( in(X7,X5)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( X7 = X8
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(X7,X5)
| X7 != X8
| in(ordered_pair(X7,X8),X6)
| X6 != identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),esk7_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| ~ in(esk6_2(X5,X6),X5)
| esk6_2(X5,X6) != esk7_2(X5,X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(esk6_2(X5,X6),X5)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),esk7_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( esk6_2(X5,X6) = esk7_2(X5,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk6_2(X5,X6),esk7_2(X5,X6)),X6)
| X6 = identity_relation(X5)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(X7,esk8_3(X5,X6,X7)),X5)
| X6 != relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X7,X9),X5)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk9_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X5,X6),X11),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(esk9_2(X5,X6),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk9_2(X5,X6),esk10_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_dom(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5) )
& ( in(esk23_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk23_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X6,X11] :
( ( ~ in(X7,X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X5,X6,X7),X7),X5)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(ordered_pair(X9,X7),X5)
| in(X7,X6)
| X6 != relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk4_2(X5,X6),X6)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X11,esk4_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) )
& ( in(esk4_2(X5,X6),X6)
| in(ordered_pair(esk5_2(X5,X6),esk4_2(X5,X6)),X5)
| X6 = relation_rng(X5)
| ~ relation(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d5_relat_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(X2)
| X3 != X4
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X3,esk8_3(X1,X2,X3)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_dom(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk23_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,X2,X3),X3),X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X2 != relation_rng(X1)
| ~ in(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(ordered_pair(X1,X1),X2)
| X2 != identity_relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X2] : relation(identity_relation(X2)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[dt_k6_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk23_2(X1,X2),esk8_3(X3,X1,esk23_2(X1,X2))),X3)
| X1 != relation_dom(X3)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X3,X1,esk23_2(X1,X2)),esk23_2(X1,X2)),X3)
| X1 != relation_rng(X3)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).
fof(c_0_20,lemma,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6) )
& ( in(X5,relation_rng(X6))
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X4,X5),X6)
| ~ relation(X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t20_relat_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk23_2(X1,X2),esk23_2(X1,X2)),X3)
| X3 != identity_relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
relation(identity_relation(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( subset(relation_dom(X1),X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk23_2(relation_dom(X1),X2),esk8_3(X1,relation_dom(X1),esk23_2(relation_dom(X1),X2))),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( subset(relation_rng(X1),X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),esk23_2(relation_rng(X1),X2)),esk23_2(relation_rng(X1),X2)),X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk23_2(X1,X2),esk23_2(X1,X2)),identity_relation(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( in(X3,X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( subset(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk23_2(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X2),esk8_3(identity_relation(X1),relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),esk23_2(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X2))),identity_relation(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( subset(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| in(ordered_pair(esk3_3(identity_relation(X1),relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)),esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)),identity_relation(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( X3 = X4
| ~ relation(X1)
| X1 != identity_relation(X2)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X3,X4),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_31,plain,
! [X3,X4,X3,X4] :
( ( subset(X3,X4)
| X3 != X4 )
& ( subset(X4,X3)
| X3 != X4 )
& ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
| ~ subset(X4,X3)
| X3 = X4 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d10_xboole_0])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk23_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,lemma,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk23_2(X1,X2),relation_dom(identity_relation(X1))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( subset(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| in(esk23_2(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X2),X3)
| identity_relation(X1) != identity_relation(X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,lemma,
( in(X3,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ in(ordered_pair(X2,X3),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( subset(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| in(esk3_3(identity_relation(X1),relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)),X3)
| identity_relation(X1) != identity_relation(X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( esk3_3(identity_relation(X1),relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)) = esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| subset(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| identity_relation(X1) != identity_relation(X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_29]),c_0_22])]) ).
fof(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1
& relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)) = X1 ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t71_relat_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ subset(X2,X1)
| ~ subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,lemma,
subset(X1,relation_dom(identity_relation(X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( subset(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| in(esk23_2(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X2),X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,lemma,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk23_2(X1,X2),relation_rng(identity_relation(X1))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_26]),c_0_22])]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( subset(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| in(esk3_3(identity_relation(X1),relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)),X1) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( esk3_3(identity_relation(X1),relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)) = esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| subset(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).
fof(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( relation_dom(identity_relation(esk1_0)) != esk1_0
| relation_rng(identity_relation(esk2_0)) != esk2_0 ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,lemma,
( relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1
| ~ subset(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
subset(relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,lemma,
subset(X1,relation_rng(identity_relation(X1))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,plain,
( subset(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2)
| in(esk23_2(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X2),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( relation_rng(identity_relation(esk2_0)) != esk2_0
| relation_dom(identity_relation(esk1_0)) != esk1_0 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,lemma,
relation_dom(identity_relation(X1)) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47])]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,lemma,
( relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)) = X1
| ~ subset(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_48]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
subset(relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
relation_rng(identity_relation(esk2_0)) != esk2_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_51])]) ).
cnf(c_0_55,lemma,
relation_rng(identity_relation(X1)) = X1,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_53])]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SEU190+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 04:02:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.34/22.51 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 0.34/22.51 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 0.34/22.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 0.34/22.51
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof found!
% 0.34/22.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.34/22.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object total steps : 57
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object clause steps : 40
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object formula steps : 17
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object initial clauses used : 12
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object generating inferences : 23
% 0.34/22.51 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 21
% 0.34/22.51 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.34/22.51 # Parsed axioms : 174
% 0.34/22.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 131
% 0.34/22.51 # Initial clauses : 78
% 0.34/22.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.34/22.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 78
% 0.34/22.51 # Processed clauses : 41252
% 0.34/22.51 # ...of these trivial : 1427
% 0.34/22.51 # ...subsumed : 26046
% 0.34/22.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 13779
% 0.34/22.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 301
% 0.34/22.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.34/22.51 # Backward-subsumed : 342
% 0.34/22.51 # Backward-rewritten : 5726
% 0.34/22.51 # Generated clauses : 238469
% 0.34/22.51 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 200197
% 0.34/22.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 11927
% 0.34/22.51 # Paramodulations : 236315
% 0.34/22.51 # Factorizations : 88
% 0.34/22.51 # Equation resolutions : 2063
% 0.34/22.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 7684
% 0.34/22.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 36
% 0.34/22.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.34/22.51 # Negative unit clauses : 18
% 0.34/22.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 7630
% 0.34/22.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 75683
% 0.34/22.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 334629
% 0.34/22.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.34/22.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 6068
% 0.34/22.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17977940
% 0.34/22.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7892806
% 0.34/22.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 37875
% 0.34/22.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39639
% 0.34/22.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 22
% 0.34/22.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 299
% 0.34/22.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 127
% 0.34/22.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.34/22.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.34/22.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9257406
% 0.34/22.51
% 0.34/22.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.34/22.51 # User time : 21.127 s
% 0.34/22.51 # System time : 0.109 s
% 0.34/22.51 # Total time : 21.236 s
% 0.34/22.51 # Maximum resident set size: 136668 pages
% 0.34/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.40 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.34/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.34/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.34/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------