TSTP Solution File: SEU178+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SEU178+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:43:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 10.49s 2.25s
% Output   : Proof 13.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU178+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 21:01:57 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.19/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.19/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.19/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.19/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.19/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.19/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.19/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.19/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.19/0.61  
% 0.19/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.19/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.19/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.19/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.19/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.19/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.19/0.64  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.19/0.64  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.19/0.64  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.57/1.04  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.57/1.04  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.87/1.08  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.87/1.08  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.87/1.08  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.87/1.08  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 2.87/1.08  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 6.25/1.59  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.55/1.64  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.55/1.65  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.55/1.66  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 6.55/1.67  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.55/1.67  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 6.55/1.68  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.55/1.69  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 7.16/1.74  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.64/1.84  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 10.49/2.25  Prover 3: proved (1610ms)
% 10.49/2.25  
% 10.49/2.25  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.49/2.25  
% 10.49/2.25  Prover 6: stopped
% 10.49/2.25  Prover 2: stopped
% 10.49/2.25  Prover 0: stopped
% 10.49/2.25  Prover 5: stopped
% 10.49/2.26  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 10.49/2.26  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 10.49/2.26  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 10.49/2.26  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 10.49/2.26  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 11.39/2.36  Prover 1: Found proof (size 66)
% 11.39/2.36  Prover 1: proved (1737ms)
% 11.39/2.36  Prover 4: stopped
% 11.39/2.39  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 11.39/2.40  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 11.39/2.40  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 12.13/2.41  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 12.13/2.42  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 12.13/2.43  Prover 10: stopped
% 12.13/2.44  Prover 7: stopped
% 12.13/2.45  Prover 13: stopped
% 12.13/2.45  Prover 11: stopped
% 12.65/2.52  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.65/2.53  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.65/2.54  Prover 8: stopped
% 12.65/2.54  
% 12.65/2.54  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 12.65/2.54  
% 12.65/2.55  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 12.65/2.56  Assumptions after simplification:
% 12.65/2.56  ---------------------------------
% 12.65/2.56  
% 12.65/2.56    (d1_relat_1)
% 13.06/2.58     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (relation(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 13.06/2.58      [v2: $i] : (in(v2, v0) = 0 & $i(v2) &  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.58          (ordered_pair(v3, v4) = v2) |  ~ $i(v4) |  ~ $i(v3)))) &  ! [v0: $i] : (
% 13.06/2.58      ~ (relation(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (in(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~
% 13.06/2.58        $i(v1) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] : (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v1 & $i(v3) &
% 13.06/2.58          $i(v2))))
% 13.06/2.58  
% 13.06/2.58    (d3_tarski)
% 13.06/2.59     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2)
% 13.06/2.59      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v3,
% 13.06/2.59          v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.59      (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v0)
% 13.06/2.59          = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | in(v2, v1) = 0))
% 13.06/2.59  
% 13.06/2.59    (d4_relat_1)
% 13.06/2.59     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2:
% 13.06/2.59        int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & relation(v0) = v2) | ( ? [v2: $i] : (v2 = v1 |  ~
% 13.06/2.59          $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] : (in(v3, v2) = v4 & $i(v3) & ( ~
% 13.06/2.59              (v4 = 0) |  ! [v5: $i] :  ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v5) =
% 13.06/2.59                  v6) |  ~ (in(v6, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v5))) & (v4 = 0 |  ? [v5: $i]
% 13.06/2.59              :  ? [v6: $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v5) = v6 & in(v6, v0) = 0 & $i(v6)
% 13.06/2.59                & $i(v5))))) & ( ~ $i(v1) | ( ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0
% 13.06/2.59              |  ~ (in(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.59                (ordered_pair(v2, v4) = v5) |  ~ (in(v5, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v4))) & 
% 13.06/2.59            ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4:
% 13.06/2.59                $i] : (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v4 & in(v4, v0) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 13.06/2.59                $i(v3)))))))
% 13.06/2.59  
% 13.06/2.59    (d5_relat_1)
% 13.06/2.60     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_rng(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2:
% 13.06/2.60        int] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & relation(v0) = v2) | ( ? [v2: $i] : (v2 = v1 |  ~
% 13.06/2.60          $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: any] : (in(v3, v2) = v4 & $i(v3) & ( ~
% 13.06/2.60              (v4 = 0) |  ! [v5: $i] :  ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v5, v3) =
% 13.06/2.60                  v6) |  ~ (in(v6, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v5))) & (v4 = 0 |  ? [v5: $i]
% 13.06/2.60              :  ? [v6: $i] : (ordered_pair(v5, v3) = v6 & in(v6, v0) = 0 & $i(v6)
% 13.06/2.60                & $i(v5))))) & ( ~ $i(v1) | ( ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: int] : (v3 = 0
% 13.06/2.60              |  ~ (in(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.60                (ordered_pair(v4, v2) = v5) |  ~ (in(v5, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v4))) & 
% 13.06/2.60            ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4:
% 13.06/2.60                $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v4 & in(v4, v0) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 13.06/2.60                $i(v3)))))))
% 13.06/2.60  
% 13.06/2.60    (t106_zfmisc_1)
% 13.06/2.60     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5:
% 13.06/2.60      $i] :  ! [v6: int] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~
% 13.06/2.60      (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4, v5) = v6) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |
% 13.06/2.60       ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v7: any] :  ? [v8: any] : (in(v1, v3) = v8 &
% 13.06/2.60        in(v0, v2) = v7 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 13.06/2.60      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.60      (cartesian_product2(v2, v3) = v5) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~
% 13.06/2.60      (in(v4, v5) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | (in(v1,
% 13.06/2.60          v3) = 0 & in(v0, v2) = 0))
% 13.06/2.60  
% 13.06/2.60    (t21_relat_1)
% 13.06/2.60     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4
% 13.06/2.60        = 0) & cartesian_product2(v1, v2) = v3 & relation_rng(v0) = v2 &
% 13.06/2.60      relation_dom(v0) = v1 & subset(v0, v3) = v4 & relation(v0) = 0 & $i(v3) &
% 13.06/2.60      $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.60  
% 13.06/2.60    (function-axioms)
% 13.06/2.61     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 13.06/2.61      (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 13.06/2.61    ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 13.06/2.61      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (element(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 13.06/2.61    [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 13.06/2.61      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 13.06/2.61    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 13.06/2.61      (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 13.06/2.61    :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3,
% 13.06/2.61          v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 13.06/2.61      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 13.06/2.61    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 13.06/2.61    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2)
% 13.06/2.61        = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2:
% 13.06/2.61      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] : 
% 13.06/2.61    ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 13.06/2.61      (singleton(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |
% 13.06/2.61       ~ (relation_rng(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_rng(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 13.06/2.61    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_dom(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 13.06/2.61      (relation_dom(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1:
% 13.06/2.61      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 13.06/2.61      (relation(v2) = v0))
% 13.06/2.61  
% 13.06/2.61  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 13.06/2.61  --------------------------------------------
% 13.06/2.61  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, commutativity_k2_tarski, d5_tarski, dt_k1_relat_1,
% 13.06/2.61  dt_k1_tarski, dt_k1_xboole_0, dt_k1_zfmisc_1, dt_k2_relat_1, dt_k2_tarski,
% 13.06/2.61  dt_k2_zfmisc_1, dt_k4_tarski, dt_m1_subset_1, existence_m1_subset_1,
% 13.06/2.61  fc1_subset_1, fc1_xboole_0, fc1_zfmisc_1, fc2_subset_1, fc3_subset_1,
% 13.06/2.61  fc4_subset_1, rc1_relat_1, rc1_subset_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_subset_1,
% 13.06/2.61  rc2_xboole_0, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t1_subset, t2_subset, t3_subset, t4_subset,
% 13.06/2.61  t5_subset, t6_boole, t7_boole, t8_boole
% 13.06/2.61  
% 13.06/2.61  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 13.06/2.61  ---------------------------------
% 13.06/2.61  
% 13.06/2.61  Begin of proof
% 13.06/2.61  | 
% 13.06/2.61  | ALPHA: (d1_relat_1) implies:
% 13.06/2.61  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (relation(v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.61  |            (in(v1, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :
% 13.06/2.61  |            (ordered_pair(v2, v3) = v1 & $i(v3) & $i(v2))))
% 13.06/2.61  | 
% 13.06/2.61  | ALPHA: (d3_tarski) implies:
% 13.06/2.61  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1)
% 13.06/2.61  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.61  |            (v4 = 0) & in(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 13.06/2.61  | 
% 13.06/2.61  | ALPHA: (t106_zfmisc_1) implies:
% 13.06/2.61  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : 
% 13.06/2.61  |        ! [v5: $i] :  ! [v6: int] : (v6 = 0 |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v2, v3) =
% 13.06/2.61  |            v5) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4, v5) = v6) |  ~
% 13.06/2.61  |          $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v7: any] :  ? [v8:
% 13.06/2.61  |            any] : (in(v1, v3) = v8 & in(v0, v2) = v7 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 =
% 13.06/2.61  |                0))))
% 13.06/2.61  | 
% 13.06/2.62  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 13.06/2.62  |   (4)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 13.06/2.62  |        (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation(v2) = v0))
% 13.06/2.62  | 
% 13.06/2.62  | DELTA: instantiating (t21_relat_1) with fresh symbols all_36_0, all_36_1,
% 13.06/2.62  |        all_36_2, all_36_3, all_36_4 gives:
% 13.06/2.62  |   (5)   ~ (all_36_0 = 0) & cartesian_product2(all_36_3, all_36_2) = all_36_1 &
% 13.06/2.62  |        relation_rng(all_36_4) = all_36_2 & relation_dom(all_36_4) = all_36_3 &
% 13.06/2.62  |        subset(all_36_4, all_36_1) = all_36_0 & relation(all_36_4) = 0 &
% 13.06/2.62  |        $i(all_36_1) & $i(all_36_2) & $i(all_36_3) & $i(all_36_4)
% 13.06/2.62  | 
% 13.06/2.62  | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 13.06/2.62  |   (6)   ~ (all_36_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.62  |   (7)  $i(all_36_4)
% 13.06/2.62  |   (8)  $i(all_36_3)
% 13.06/2.62  |   (9)  $i(all_36_2)
% 13.06/2.62  |   (10)  $i(all_36_1)
% 13.06/2.62  |   (11)  relation(all_36_4) = 0
% 13.06/2.62  |   (12)  subset(all_36_4, all_36_1) = all_36_0
% 13.06/2.62  |   (13)  relation_dom(all_36_4) = all_36_3
% 13.06/2.62  |   (14)  relation_rng(all_36_4) = all_36_2
% 13.06/2.62  |   (15)  cartesian_product2(all_36_3, all_36_2) = all_36_1
% 13.06/2.62  | 
% 13.06/2.62  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_36_4, simplifying with (7), (11)
% 13.06/2.62  |              gives:
% 13.06/2.62  |   (16)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_36_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] : 
% 13.06/2.62  |           ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.62  | 
% 13.06/2.62  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_36_4, all_36_1, all_36_0, simplifying
% 13.06/2.62  |              with (7), (10), (12) gives:
% 13.06/2.62  |   (17)  all_36_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0,
% 13.06/2.62  |             all_36_1) = v1 & in(v0, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.62  | 
% 13.06/2.62  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (d4_relat_1) with all_36_4, all_36_3, simplifying
% 13.06/2.62  |              with (7), (13) gives:
% 13.06/2.63  |   (18)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_36_4) = v0) | ( ? [v0: any]
% 13.06/2.63  |           : (v0 = all_36_3 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] : (in(v1,
% 13.06/2.63  |                 v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :
% 13.06/2.63  |                 ( ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4, all_36_4) = 0) | 
% 13.06/2.63  |                   ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 13.06/2.63  |                 (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4 & in(v4, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 13.06/2.63  |                   $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_36_3) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int]
% 13.06/2.63  |               : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_36_3) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i]
% 13.06/2.63  |                 :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 13.06/2.63  |                       all_36_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0,
% 13.06/2.63  |                     all_36_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 13.06/2.63  |                 (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 13.06/2.63  |                   $i(v1))))))
% 13.06/2.63  | 
% 13.06/2.63  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (d5_relat_1) with all_36_4, all_36_2, simplifying
% 13.06/2.63  |              with (7), (14) gives:
% 13.06/2.63  |   (19)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_36_4) = v0) | ( ? [v0: any]
% 13.06/2.63  |           : (v0 = all_36_2 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: any] : (in(v1,
% 13.06/2.63  |                 v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :
% 13.06/2.63  |                 ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4, all_36_4) = 0) | 
% 13.06/2.63  |                   ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 13.06/2.63  |                 (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v4, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v4) &
% 13.06/2.63  |                   $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_36_2) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int]
% 13.06/2.63  |               : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_36_2) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i]
% 13.06/2.63  |                 :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3,
% 13.06/2.63  |                       all_36_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0,
% 13.06/2.63  |                     all_36_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 13.06/2.63  |                 (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 13.06/2.63  |                   $i(v1))))))
% 13.06/2.63  | 
% 13.06/2.63  | BETA: splitting (19) gives:
% 13.06/2.63  | 
% 13.06/2.63  | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (20)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_36_4) = v0)
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbol all_52_0 gives:
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (21)   ~ (all_52_0 = 0) & relation(all_36_4) = all_52_0
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | | ALPHA: (21) implies:
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (22)   ~ (all_52_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (23)  relation(all_36_4) = all_52_0
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | | DELTA: instantiating (20) with fresh symbol all_54_0 gives:
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (24)   ~ (all_54_0 = 0) & relation(all_36_4) = all_54_0
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | | ALPHA: (24) implies:
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (25)  relation(all_36_4) = all_54_0
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 0, all_54_0, all_36_4, simplifying with
% 13.06/2.63  | |              (11), (25) gives:
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (26)  all_54_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_52_0, all_54_0, all_36_4,
% 13.06/2.63  | |              simplifying with (23), (25) gives:
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (27)  all_54_0 = all_52_0
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | | COMBINE_EQS: (26), (27) imply:
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (28)  all_52_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.63  | | 
% 13.06/2.63  | | REDUCE: (22), (28) imply:
% 13.06/2.63  | |   (29)  $false
% 13.06/2.64  | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | CLOSE: (29) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.64  | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.64  | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | |   (30)   ? [v0: any] : (v0 = all_36_2 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2:
% 13.06/2.64  | |             any] : (in(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i] : 
% 13.06/2.64  | |               ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4,
% 13.06/2.64  | |                     all_36_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] : 
% 13.06/2.64  | |               ? [v4: $i] : (ordered_pair(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v4, all_36_4) = 0
% 13.06/2.64  | |                 & $i(v4) & $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_36_2) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 13.06/2.64  | |             [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_36_2) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 13.06/2.64  | |               ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) | 
% 13.06/2.64  | |                 ~ (in(v3, all_36_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.64  | |               (in(v0, all_36_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i]
% 13.06/2.64  | |               : (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 13.06/2.64  | |                 $i(v1)))))
% 13.06/2.64  | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | ALPHA: (30) implies:
% 13.06/2.64  | |   (31)   ~ $i(all_36_2) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0,
% 13.06/2.64  | |                 all_36_2) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (
% 13.06/2.64  | |               ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_36_4) = 0) |  ~
% 13.06/2.64  | |               $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_36_2) = 0) |  ~
% 13.06/2.64  | |             $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2
% 13.06/2.64  | |               & in(v2, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1))))
% 13.06/2.64  | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | BETA: splitting (18) gives:
% 13.06/2.64  | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.64  | | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | |   (32)   ? [v0: int] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & relation(all_36_4) = v0)
% 13.06/2.64  | | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | | DELTA: instantiating (32) with fresh symbol all_52_0 gives:
% 13.06/2.64  | | |   (33)   ~ (all_52_0 = 0) & relation(all_36_4) = all_52_0
% 13.06/2.64  | | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | | ALPHA: (33) implies:
% 13.06/2.64  | | |   (34)   ~ (all_52_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.64  | | |   (35)  relation(all_36_4) = all_52_0
% 13.06/2.64  | | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 0, all_52_0, all_36_4, simplifying
% 13.06/2.64  | | |              with (11), (35) gives:
% 13.06/2.64  | | |   (36)  all_52_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.64  | | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | | REDUCE: (34), (36) imply:
% 13.06/2.64  | | |   (37)  $false
% 13.06/2.64  | | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | | CLOSE: (37) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.64  | | | 
% 13.06/2.64  | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.64  | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | |   (38)   ? [v0: any] : (v0 = all_36_3 |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2:
% 13.06/2.65  | | |             any] : (in(v1, v0) = v2 & $i(v1) & ( ~ (v2 = 0) |  ! [v3: $i]
% 13.06/2.65  | | |               :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4) |  ~ (in(v4,
% 13.06/2.65  | | |                     all_36_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3))) & (v2 = 0 |  ? [v3: $i] :
% 13.06/2.65  | | |                ? [v4: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v3) = v4 & in(v4, all_36_4)
% 13.06/2.65  | | |                 = 0 & $i(v4) & $i(v3))))) & ( ~ $i(all_36_3) | ( ! [v0:
% 13.06/2.65  | | |               $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_36_3) = v1) | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | |               ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0,
% 13.06/2.65  | | |                     v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_36_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) & 
% 13.06/2.65  | | |             ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_36_3) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1:
% 13.06/2.65  | | |                 $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2,
% 13.06/2.65  | | |                   all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))))
% 13.06/2.65  | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | ALPHA: (38) implies:
% 13.06/2.65  | | |   (39)   ~ $i(all_36_3) | ( ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~
% 13.06/2.65  | | |             (in(v0, all_36_3) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 13.06/2.65  | | |               $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_36_4)
% 13.06/2.65  | | |                 = 0) |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_36_3) =
% 13.06/2.65  | | |               0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 13.06/2.65  | | |             (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2 & in(v2, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v2) &
% 13.06/2.65  | | |               $i(v1))))
% 13.06/2.65  | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | BETA: splitting (17) gives:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |   (40)  all_36_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | REDUCE: (6), (40) imply:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |   (41)  $false
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | CLOSE: (41) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |   (42)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0, all_36_1) =
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |           v1 & in(v0, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (42) with fresh symbols all_56_0, all_56_1 gives:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |   (43)   ~ (all_56_0 = 0) & in(all_56_1, all_36_1) = all_56_0 &
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |         in(all_56_1, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(all_56_1)
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | ALPHA: (43) implies:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |   (44)   ~ (all_56_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |   (45)  $i(all_56_1)
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |   (46)  in(all_56_1, all_36_4) = 0
% 13.06/2.65  | | | |   (47)  in(all_56_1, all_36_1) = all_56_0
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | BETA: splitting (39) gives:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |   (48)   ~ $i(all_36_3)
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (8), (48) imply:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |   (49)  $false
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | CLOSE: (49) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |   (50)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_36_3) =
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |             v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |             (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_36_4) = 0) | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |             ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_36_3) = 0) |  ~
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |           $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) =
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |             v2 & in(v2, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | ALPHA: (50) implies:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |   (51)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_36_3) =
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |             v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |             (ordered_pair(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_36_4) = 0) | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | |             ~ $i(v2)))
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | BETA: splitting (31) gives:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | |   (52)   ~ $i(all_36_2)
% 13.06/2.65  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (9), (52) imply:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (53)  $false
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | CLOSE: (53) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (54)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_36_2)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |             = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |             (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_36_4) = 0)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |             |  ~ $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_36_2) = 0)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |           |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |           (ordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 & in(v2, all_36_4) = 0 & $i(v2)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |             & $i(v1)))
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | ALPHA: (54) implies:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (55)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_36_2)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |             = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |             (ordered_pair(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (in(v3, all_36_4) = 0)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |             |  ~ $i(v2)))
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (16) with all_56_1, simplifying with
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |              (45), (46) gives:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (56)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_56_1
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |           & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (56) with fresh symbols all_76_0, all_76_1
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |        gives:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (57)  ordered_pair(all_76_1, all_76_0) = all_56_1 & $i(all_76_0) &
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |         $i(all_76_1)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | ALPHA: (57) implies:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (58)  $i(all_76_1)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (59)  $i(all_76_0)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (60)  ordered_pair(all_76_1, all_76_0) = all_56_1
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_76_1, all_76_0, all_36_3,
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |              all_36_2, all_56_1, all_36_1, all_56_0, simplifying
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |              with (8), (9), (15), (47), (58), (59), (60) gives:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |   (61)  all_56_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (in(all_76_0,
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |             all_36_2) = v1 & in(all_76_1, all_36_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 =
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | |               0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | BETA: splitting (61) gives:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (62)  all_56_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | REDUCE: (44), (62) imply:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (63)  $false
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | CLOSE: (63) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (64)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (in(all_76_0, all_36_2) = v1
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |           & in(all_76_1, all_36_3) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 =
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |               0)))
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (64) with fresh symbols all_89_0, all_89_1
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |        gives:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (65)  in(all_76_0, all_36_2) = all_89_0 & in(all_76_1, all_36_3)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |         = all_89_1 & ( ~ (all_89_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_89_1 = 0))
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | ALPHA: (65) implies:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (66)  in(all_76_1, all_36_3) = all_89_1
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (67)  in(all_76_0, all_36_2) = all_89_0
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (68)   ~ (all_89_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_89_1 = 0)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (51) with all_76_1, all_89_1,
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |              simplifying with (58), (66) gives:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (69)  all_89_1 = 0 |  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |           (ordered_pair(all_76_1, v0) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1, all_36_4)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |             = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (55) with all_76_0, all_89_0,
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |              simplifying with (59), (67) gives:
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |   (70)  all_89_0 = 0 |  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |           (ordered_pair(v0, all_76_0) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1, all_36_4)
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | |             = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.66  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (68) gives:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | |   (71)   ~ (all_89_0 = 0)
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (70) gives:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |   (72)  all_89_0 = 0
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (71), (72) imply:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |   (73)  $false
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (73) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |   (74)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0,
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |               all_76_0) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1, all_36_4) = 0) |  ~
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |           $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (74) with all_76_1, all_56_1,
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (46), (58), (60) gives:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |   (75)  $false
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (75) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | |   (76)   ~ (all_89_1 = 0)
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | BETA: splitting (69) gives:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | Case 1:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |   (77)  all_89_1 = 0
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | REDUCE: (76), (77) imply:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |   (78)  $false
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (78) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | Case 2:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |   (79)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |           (ordered_pair(all_76_1, v0) = v1) |  ~ (in(v1,
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |               all_36_4) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0))
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (79) with all_76_0, all_56_1,
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |              simplifying with (46), (59), (60) gives:
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | |   (80)  $false
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | CLOSE: (80) is inconsistent.
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | | 
% 13.06/2.67  | End of split
% 13.06/2.67  | 
% 13.06/2.67  End of proof
% 13.06/2.67  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 13.06/2.67  
% 13.06/2.67  2059ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------