TSTP Solution File: SEU177+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU177+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:39:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 4.40s 2.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.40s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 33 ( 4 equ; 21 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_30,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_dom(X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X4),singleton(X1)),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nuqnhgxl/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_26,negated_conjecture,
in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0),singleton(esk5_0)),esk7_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nuqnhgxl/lgb.p',i_0_26) ).
cnf(i_0_27,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk7_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nuqnhgxl/lgb.p',i_0_27) ).
cnf(i_0_34,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_rng(X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X1),singleton(X4)),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nuqnhgxl/lgb.p',i_0_34) ).
cnf(i_0_25,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk5_0,relation_dom(esk7_0))
| ~ in(esk6_0,relation_rng(esk7_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nuqnhgxl/lgb.p',i_0_25) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_dom(X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X4),singleton(X1)),X3) ),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),singleton(X1)),X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk5_0,esk6_0),singleton(esk5_0)),esk7_0),
i_0_26 ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk7_0),
i_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_rng(X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X4,X1),singleton(X4)),X3) ),
i_0_34 ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(esk5_0,relation_dom(esk7_0))
| ~ in(esk6_0,relation_rng(esk7_0)) ),
i_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
in(esk5_0,relation_dom(esk7_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
( in(X1,relation_rng(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X1),singleton(X3)),X2) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
~ in(esk6_0,relation_rng(esk7_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46])]) ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_42]),c_0_43])]),c_0_48]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : SEU177+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 06:29:30 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.40/2.20 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 4.40/2.20 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.40/2.20 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.40/2.20 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.40/2.20 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 4.40/2.20 #
% 4.40/2.20 # Preprocessing time : 0.012 s
% 4.40/2.20 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.40/2.20
% 4.40/2.20 # Proof found!
% 4.40/2.20 # SZS status Theorem
% 4.40/2.20 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.40/2.20 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.40/2.20
% 4.40/2.20 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.40/2.20 # User time : 0.013 s
% 4.40/2.20 # System time : 0.004 s
% 4.40/2.20 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 4.40/2.20 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 4.40/2.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------