TSTP Solution File: SEU173+1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SEU173+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:04:51 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 2.70s 1.15s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  161 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  190 (  75   ~;  68   |;  29   &)
%                                         (   8 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   96 (   1 sgn  65   !;  10   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( powerset(X0) = X1
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
        <=> subset(X2,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( empty(X0)
       => ( element(X1,X0)
        <=> empty(X1) ) )
      & ( ~ empty(X0)
       => ( element(X1,X0)
        <=> in(X1,X0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_subset_1) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f11,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) )
     => element(X0,powerset(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l71_subset_1) ).

fof(f12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X0)
           => in(X2,X1) )
       => element(X0,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f19,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ~ ( empty(X1)
        & in(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t7_boole) ).

fof(f23,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( element(X1,X0)
        <=> empty(X1) )
        | ~ empty(X0) )
      & ( ( element(X1,X0)
        <=> in(X1,X0) )
        | empty(X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          | ~ in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ element(X0,powerset(X1))
      & ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          | ~ in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ empty(X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( powerset(X0) = X1
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( ~ subset(X2,X0)
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( subset(X2,X0)
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( ( in(X2,X1)
              | ~ subset(X2,X0) )
            & ( subset(X2,X0)
              | ~ in(X2,X1) ) )
        | powerset(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( powerset(X0) = X1
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ( ~ subset(X2,X0)
              | ~ in(X2,X1) )
            & ( subset(X2,X0)
              | in(X2,X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X1)
              | ~ subset(X3,X0) )
            & ( subset(X3,X0)
              | ~ in(X3,X1) ) )
        | powerset(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f32,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ( ~ subset(X2,X0)
            | ~ in(X2,X1) )
          & ( subset(X2,X0)
            | in(X2,X1) ) )
     => ( ( ~ subset(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
          | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
        & ( subset(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
          | in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( powerset(X0) = X1
        | ( ( ~ subset(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
            | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
          & ( subset(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
            | in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X1)
              | ~ subset(X3,X0) )
            & ( subset(X3,X0)
              | ~ in(X3,X1) ) )
        | powerset(X0) != X1 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f31,f32]) ).

fof(f34,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ( ( element(X1,X0)
            | ~ empty(X1) )
          & ( empty(X1)
            | ~ element(X1,X0) ) )
        | ~ empty(X0) )
      & ( ( ( element(X1,X0)
            | ~ in(X1,X0) )
          & ( in(X1,X0)
            | ~ element(X1,X0) ) )
        | empty(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

fof(f35,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X1)
            | ~ in(X2,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f36,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ? [X2] :
            ( ~ in(X2,X1)
            & in(X2,X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ? [X2] :
          ( ~ in(X2,X1)
          & in(X2,X0) )
     => ( ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
        & in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X0,X1)
        | ( ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
          & in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( in(X3,X1)
            | ~ in(X3,X0) )
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f36,f37]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ~ element(X0,powerset(X1))
        & ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X1)
            | ~ in(X2,X0) ) )
   => ( ~ element(sK3,powerset(sK4))
      & ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,sK4)
          | ~ in(X2,sK3) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( ~ element(sK3,powerset(sK4))
    & ! [X2] :
        ( in(X2,sK4)
        | ~ in(X2,sK3) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3,sK4])],[f25,f41]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( in(X3,X1)
      | ~ subset(X3,X0)
      | powerset(X0) != X1 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f33]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( element(X1,X0)
      | ~ in(X1,X0)
      | empty(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | in(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( in(X2,sK4)
      | ~ in(X2,sK3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ~ element(sK3,powerset(sK4)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ empty(X1)
      | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

fof(f78,plain,
    ! [X3,X0] :
      ( in(X3,powerset(X0))
      | ~ subset(X3,X0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f53]) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | in(X0,powerset(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,X1)
    | element(X0,X1)
    | empty(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f57]) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    ( ~ in(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
    | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    ( in(sK1(X0,X1),X0)
    | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f61]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ element(sK3,powerset(sK4)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X0,sK3)
    | in(X0,sK4) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,X1)
    | ~ empty(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f76]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( element(X0,X1)
    | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_56,c_74,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,X1)
    | element(X0,X1) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_89]) ).

cnf(c_97,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,X1)
    | element(X0,X1) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_90]) ).

cnf(c_391,plain,
    ( powerset(sK4) != X1
    | X0 != sK3
    | ~ in(X0,X1) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_97,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_392,plain,
    ~ in(sK3,powerset(sK4)),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_391]) ).

cnf(c_649,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(X0,sK3)
    | in(X0,sK4) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

cnf(c_1234,plain,
    ~ subset(sK3,sK4),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_392]) ).

cnf(c_1253,plain,
    ( in(sK1(sK3,X0),sK4)
    | subset(sK3,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_649]) ).

cnf(c_1279,plain,
    subset(sK3,sK4),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1253,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_1280,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1279,c_1234]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.11  % Problem  : SEU173+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.12  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Thu May  2 17:38:41 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 2.70/1.15  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.70/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------  iProver source info
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 2.70/1.15  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 2.70/1.15  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Parsing...
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e 
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Proving...
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  clauses                                 27
% 2.70/1.15  conjectures                             1
% 2.70/1.15  EPR                                     10
% 2.70/1.15  Horn                                    23
% 2.70/1.15  unary                                   9
% 2.70/1.15  binary                                  13
% 2.70/1.15  lits                                    50
% 2.70/1.15  lits eq                                 9
% 2.70/1.15  fd_pure                                 0
% 2.70/1.15  fd_pseudo                               0
% 2.70/1.15  fd_cond                                 1
% 2.70/1.15  fd_pseudo_cond                          3
% 2.70/1.15  AC symbols                              0
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------ 
% 2.70/1.15  Current options:
% 2.70/1.15  ------ 
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  ------ Proving...
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.70/1.15  
% 2.70/1.15  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------