TSTP Solution File: SEU166+2 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SEU166+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:42:58 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 16.42s 2.98s
% Output   : Proof 17.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU166+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 01:20:39 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.52/0.66  ________       _____
% 0.52/0.66  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.52/0.66  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.52/0.66  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.52/0.66  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.52/0.66  
% 0.52/0.66  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.52/0.66  (2023-06-19)
% 0.52/0.66  
% 0.52/0.66  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.52/0.66  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.52/0.66                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.52/0.66  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.52/0.66  
% 0.52/0.66  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.52/0.66  
% 0.52/0.66  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.52/0.67  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.52/0.68  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.52/0.68  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.52/0.68  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.77/0.68  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.77/0.68  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.77/0.68  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.77/0.68  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.29/1.26  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.29/1.26  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 3.92/1.30  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.92/1.30  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.92/1.30  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.92/1.30  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.92/1.30  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 9.57/2.12  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.34/2.18  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 10.68/2.20  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.50/2.34  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.50/2.35  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.50/2.36  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.50/2.37  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 12.27/2.50  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.07/2.51  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 13.07/2.52  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 16.42/2.95  Prover 1: Found proof (size 66)
% 16.42/2.98  Prover 1: proved (2278ms)
% 16.42/2.98  Prover 4: stopped
% 16.42/2.98  Prover 5: stopped
% 16.42/2.98  Prover 6: stopped
% 16.42/2.98  Prover 0: stopped
% 16.42/2.98  Prover 3: stopped
% 16.42/2.98  Prover 2: stopped
% 16.42/2.98  
% 16.42/2.98  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 16.42/2.98  
% 16.72/2.99  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 16.72/3.00  Assumptions after simplification:
% 16.72/3.00  ---------------------------------
% 16.72/3.00  
% 16.72/3.00    (d2_zfmisc_1)
% 16.72/3.03     ? [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v0 |  ~
% 16.72/3.03      (cartesian_product2(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ?
% 16.72/3.03      [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: any] : (in(v4, v0) = v5 & $i(v4) & ( ~ (v5 = 0) |  ! [v6:
% 16.72/3.03            $i] :  ! [v7: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v6, v7) = v4) |  ~ $i(v7) |  ~
% 16.72/3.03            $i(v6) |  ? [v8: any] :  ? [v9: any] : (in(v7, v2) = v9 & in(v6, v1) =
% 16.72/3.03              v8 & ( ~ (v9 = 0) |  ~ (v8 = 0))))) & (v5 = 0 |  ? [v6: $i] :  ?
% 16.72/3.03          [v7: $i] : (ordered_pair(v6, v7) = v4 & in(v7, v2) = 0 & in(v6, v1) = 0
% 16.72/3.03            & $i(v7) & $i(v6))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 16.72/3.03      (cartesian_product2(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | ( !
% 16.72/3.03        [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  !
% 16.72/3.03          [v5: $i] :  ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v5, v6) = v3) |  ~ $i(v6) | 
% 16.72/3.03            ~ $i(v5) |  ? [v7: any] :  ? [v8: any] : (in(v6, v1) = v8 & in(v5, v0)
% 16.72/3.03              = v7 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0))))) &  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (in(v3,
% 16.72/3.03              v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] : (ordered_pair(v4,
% 16.72/3.03              v5) = v3 & in(v5, v1) = 0 & in(v4, v0) = 0 & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))))
% 16.72/3.03  
% 16.72/3.03    (d3_tarski)
% 16.72/3.04     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2)
% 16.72/3.04      |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v3,
% 16.72/3.04          v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 16.72/3.04      (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v0)
% 16.72/3.04          = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | in(v2, v1) = 0))
% 16.72/3.04  
% 16.72/3.04    (t118_zfmisc_1)
% 16.72/3.04     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 16.72/3.04      any] :  ? [v6: $i] :  ? [v7: $i] :  ? [v8: any] : (cartesian_product2(v2,
% 16.72/3.04        v1) = v7 & cartesian_product2(v2, v0) = v6 & cartesian_product2(v1, v2) =
% 16.72/3.04      v4 & cartesian_product2(v0, v2) = v3 & subset(v6, v7) = v8 & subset(v3, v4)
% 16.72/3.04      = v5 & subset(v0, v1) = 0 & $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) &
% 16.72/3.04      $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v5 = 0)))
% 16.72/3.04  
% 16.72/3.04    (function-axioms)
% 16.72/3.05     ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 16.72/3.05    [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (disjoint(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (disjoint(v3, v2) = v0))
% 16.72/3.05    &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.72/3.05      (set_difference(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (set_difference(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 16.72/3.05      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.72/3.05      (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (cartesian_product2(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 16.72/3.05    ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.72/3.05      (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (ordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 16.72/3.05      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 16.72/3.05    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 16.72/3.05      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.72/3.05      (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (set_intersection2(v3, v2) = v0)) &  !
% 16.72/3.05    [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.72/3.05      (set_union2(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (set_union2(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 16.72/3.05    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) =
% 16.72/3.05        v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  !
% 16.72/3.05    [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.72/3.05      (proper_subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (proper_subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 16.72/3.05      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i]
% 16.72/3.05    : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0:
% 16.72/3.05      MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 16.72/3.05      ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 16.72/3.05    [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (union(v2) = v1) |  ~ (union(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 16.72/3.05    :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 16.72/3.05      (powerset(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 16.72/3.05      ~ (singleton(v2) = v1) |  ~ (singleton(v2) = v0))
% 16.72/3.05  
% 16.72/3.05  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 16.72/3.05  --------------------------------------------
% 16.72/3.05  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, antisymmetry_r2_xboole_0, commutativity_k2_tarski,
% 16.72/3.05  commutativity_k2_xboole_0, commutativity_k3_xboole_0, d10_xboole_0, d1_tarski,
% 16.72/3.05  d1_xboole_0, d1_zfmisc_1, d2_tarski, d2_xboole_0, d3_xboole_0, d4_tarski,
% 16.72/3.05  d4_xboole_0, d5_tarski, d7_xboole_0, d8_xboole_0, dt_k1_tarski, dt_k1_xboole_0,
% 16.72/3.05  dt_k1_zfmisc_1, dt_k2_tarski, dt_k2_xboole_0, dt_k2_zfmisc_1, dt_k3_tarski,
% 16.72/3.05  dt_k3_xboole_0, dt_k4_tarski, dt_k4_xboole_0, fc1_xboole_0, fc1_zfmisc_1,
% 16.72/3.05  fc2_xboole_0, fc3_xboole_0, idempotence_k2_xboole_0, idempotence_k3_xboole_0,
% 16.72/3.05  irreflexivity_r2_xboole_0, l1_zfmisc_1, l23_zfmisc_1, l25_zfmisc_1,
% 16.72/3.05  l28_zfmisc_1, l2_zfmisc_1, l32_xboole_1, l3_zfmisc_1, l4_zfmisc_1, l50_zfmisc_1,
% 16.72/3.05  l55_zfmisc_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_xboole_0, reflexivity_r1_tarski,
% 16.72/3.05  symmetry_r1_xboole_0, t106_zfmisc_1, t10_zfmisc_1, t12_xboole_1, t17_xboole_1,
% 16.72/3.05  t19_xboole_1, t1_boole, t1_xboole_1, t1_zfmisc_1, t26_xboole_1, t28_xboole_1,
% 16.72/3.05  t2_boole, t2_tarski, t2_xboole_1, t33_xboole_1, t33_zfmisc_1, t36_xboole_1,
% 16.72/3.05  t37_xboole_1, t37_zfmisc_1, t38_zfmisc_1, t39_xboole_1, t39_zfmisc_1, t3_boole,
% 16.72/3.05  t3_xboole_0, t3_xboole_1, t40_xboole_1, t45_xboole_1, t46_zfmisc_1,
% 16.72/3.05  t48_xboole_1, t4_boole, t4_xboole_0, t60_xboole_1, t63_xboole_1, t65_zfmisc_1,
% 16.72/3.05  t69_enumset1, t6_boole, t6_zfmisc_1, t7_boole, t7_xboole_1, t83_xboole_1,
% 16.72/3.05  t8_boole, t8_xboole_1, t8_zfmisc_1, t92_zfmisc_1, t99_zfmisc_1, t9_zfmisc_1
% 16.72/3.05  
% 16.72/3.05  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 16.72/3.05  ---------------------------------
% 16.72/3.05  
% 16.72/3.05  Begin of proof
% 16.72/3.05  | 
% 16.72/3.05  | ALPHA: (d2_zfmisc_1) implies:
% 16.72/3.06  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (cartesian_product2(v0,
% 16.72/3.06  |              v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | ( ! [v3: $i] :  !
% 16.72/3.06  |            [v4: int] : (v4 = 0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ! [v5:
% 16.72/3.06  |                $i] :  ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v5, v6) = v3) |  ~ $i(v6)
% 16.72/3.06  |                |  ~ $i(v5) |  ? [v7: any] :  ? [v8: any] : (in(v6, v1) = v8 &
% 16.72/3.06  |                  in(v5, v0) = v7 & ( ~ (v8 = 0) |  ~ (v7 = 0))))) &  ! [v3:
% 16.72/3.06  |              $i] : ( ~ (in(v3, v2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ? [v4: $i] :  ? [v5:
% 16.72/3.06  |                $i] : (ordered_pair(v4, v5) = v3 & in(v5, v1) = 0 & in(v4, v0)
% 16.72/3.06  |                = 0 & $i(v5) & $i(v4)))))
% 16.72/3.06  | 
% 16.72/3.06  | ALPHA: (d3_tarski) implies:
% 16.72/3.06  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 16.72/3.06  |          $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (in(v2, v0) = 0) |  ~ $i(v2) | in(v2, v1)
% 16.72/3.06  |            = 0))
% 16.72/3.06  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: int] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1)
% 16.72/3.06  |            = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ( ~
% 16.72/3.06  |            (v4 = 0) & in(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0 & $i(v3)))
% 16.72/3.06  | 
% 16.72/3.06  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 16.72/3.06  |   (4)   ! [v0: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v1: MultipleValueBool] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 16.72/3.06  |         ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0))
% 16.72/3.06  | 
% 16.72/3.06  | DELTA: instantiating (t118_zfmisc_1) with fresh symbols all_110_0, all_110_1,
% 16.72/3.06  |        all_110_2, all_110_3, all_110_4, all_110_5, all_110_6, all_110_7,
% 16.72/3.06  |        all_110_8 gives:
% 16.72/3.06  |   (5)  cartesian_product2(all_110_6, all_110_7) = all_110_1 &
% 16.72/3.06  |        cartesian_product2(all_110_6, all_110_8) = all_110_2 &
% 16.72/3.06  |        cartesian_product2(all_110_7, all_110_6) = all_110_4 &
% 16.72/3.06  |        cartesian_product2(all_110_8, all_110_6) = all_110_5 &
% 16.72/3.06  |        subset(all_110_2, all_110_1) = all_110_0 & subset(all_110_5, all_110_4)
% 16.72/3.06  |        = all_110_3 & subset(all_110_8, all_110_7) = 0 & $i(all_110_1) &
% 16.72/3.06  |        $i(all_110_2) & $i(all_110_4) & $i(all_110_5) & $i(all_110_6) &
% 16.72/3.06  |        $i(all_110_7) & $i(all_110_8) & ( ~ (all_110_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_110_3 =
% 16.72/3.06  |            0))
% 16.72/3.06  | 
% 16.72/3.06  | ALPHA: (5) implies:
% 16.72/3.06  |   (6)  $i(all_110_8)
% 16.72/3.06  |   (7)  $i(all_110_7)
% 16.72/3.06  |   (8)  $i(all_110_6)
% 16.72/3.06  |   (9)  $i(all_110_5)
% 16.72/3.06  |   (10)  $i(all_110_4)
% 16.72/3.06  |   (11)  $i(all_110_2)
% 16.72/3.06  |   (12)  $i(all_110_1)
% 16.72/3.06  |   (13)  subset(all_110_8, all_110_7) = 0
% 16.72/3.06  |   (14)  subset(all_110_5, all_110_4) = all_110_3
% 16.72/3.06  |   (15)  subset(all_110_2, all_110_1) = all_110_0
% 16.72/3.06  |   (16)  cartesian_product2(all_110_8, all_110_6) = all_110_5
% 16.72/3.06  |   (17)  cartesian_product2(all_110_7, all_110_6) = all_110_4
% 16.72/3.06  |   (18)  cartesian_product2(all_110_6, all_110_8) = all_110_2
% 16.72/3.06  |   (19)  cartesian_product2(all_110_6, all_110_7) = all_110_1
% 16.72/3.06  |   (20)   ~ (all_110_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_110_3 = 0)
% 16.72/3.06  | 
% 16.72/3.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_110_8, all_110_7, simplifying with
% 16.72/3.07  |              (6), (7), (13) gives:
% 16.72/3.07  |   (21)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_110_8) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) | in(v0,
% 16.72/3.07  |             all_110_7) = 0)
% 16.72/3.07  | 
% 16.72/3.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_110_5, all_110_4, all_110_3,
% 16.72/3.07  |              simplifying with (9), (10), (14) gives:
% 16.72/3.07  |   (22)  all_110_3 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0,
% 16.72/3.07  |             all_110_4) = v1 & in(v0, all_110_5) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 16.72/3.07  | 
% 16.72/3.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_110_2, all_110_1, all_110_0,
% 16.72/3.07  |              simplifying with (11), (12), (15) gives:
% 16.72/3.07  |   (23)  all_110_0 = 0 |  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0,
% 16.72/3.07  |             all_110_1) = v1 & in(v0, all_110_2) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 16.72/3.07  | 
% 16.72/3.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_110_8, all_110_6, all_110_5,
% 16.72/3.07  |              simplifying with (6), (8), (9), (16) gives:
% 16.72/3.07  |   (24)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_110_5) = v1) | 
% 16.72/3.07  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) =
% 16.72/3.07  |               v0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 16.72/3.07  |             (in(v3, all_110_6) = v5 & in(v2, all_110_8) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.07  |                 ~ (v4 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_110_5) = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.07  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0 &
% 16.72/3.07  |             in(v2, all_110_6) = 0 & in(v1, all_110_8) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 16.72/3.07  | 
% 16.72/3.07  | ALPHA: (24) implies:
% 16.72/3.07  |   (25)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_110_5) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] : 
% 16.72/3.07  |           ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0 & in(v2, all_110_6) = 0 &
% 16.72/3.07  |             in(v1, all_110_8) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 16.72/3.07  | 
% 16.72/3.07  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_110_7, all_110_6, all_110_4,
% 16.72/3.07  |              simplifying with (7), (8), (10), (17) gives:
% 16.72/3.07  |   (26)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_110_4) = v1) | 
% 16.72/3.07  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) =
% 16.72/3.07  |               v0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 16.72/3.07  |             (in(v3, all_110_6) = v5 & in(v2, all_110_7) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.07  |                 ~ (v4 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_110_4) = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.07  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0 &
% 16.72/3.07  |             in(v2, all_110_6) = 0 & in(v1, all_110_7) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 16.72/3.07  | 
% 16.72/3.07  | ALPHA: (26) implies:
% 16.72/3.07  |   (27)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_110_4) = v1) | 
% 16.72/3.07  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) =
% 16.72/3.07  |               v0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 16.72/3.08  |             (in(v3, all_110_6) = v5 & in(v2, all_110_7) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |                 ~ (v4 = 0)))))
% 16.72/3.08  | 
% 16.72/3.08  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_110_6, all_110_8, all_110_2,
% 16.72/3.08  |              simplifying with (6), (8), (11), (18) gives:
% 16.72/3.08  |   (28)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_110_2) = v1) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) =
% 16.72/3.08  |               v0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 16.72/3.08  |             (in(v3, all_110_8) = v5 & in(v2, all_110_6) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |                 ~ (v4 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_110_2) = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0 &
% 16.72/3.08  |             in(v2, all_110_8) = 0 & in(v1, all_110_6) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 16.72/3.08  | 
% 16.72/3.08  | ALPHA: (28) implies:
% 16.72/3.08  |   (29)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_110_2) = 0) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] : 
% 16.72/3.08  |           ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0 & in(v2, all_110_8) = 0 &
% 16.72/3.08  |             in(v1, all_110_6) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 16.72/3.08  | 
% 16.72/3.08  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_110_6, all_110_7, all_110_1,
% 16.72/3.08  |              simplifying with (7), (8), (12), (19) gives:
% 16.72/3.08  |   (30)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_110_1) = v1) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) =
% 16.72/3.08  |               v0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 16.72/3.08  |             (in(v3, all_110_7) = v5 & in(v2, all_110_6) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |                 ~ (v4 = 0))))) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (in(v0, all_110_1) = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (ordered_pair(v1, v2) = v0 &
% 16.72/3.08  |             in(v2, all_110_7) = 0 & in(v1, all_110_6) = 0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 16.72/3.08  | 
% 16.72/3.08  | ALPHA: (30) implies:
% 16.72/3.08  |   (31)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: int] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (in(v0, all_110_1) = v1) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |           ~ $i(v0) |  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v2, v3) =
% 16.72/3.08  |               v0) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ? [v4: any] :  ? [v5: any] :
% 16.72/3.08  |             (in(v3, all_110_7) = v5 & in(v2, all_110_6) = v4 & ( ~ (v5 = 0) | 
% 16.72/3.08  |                 ~ (v4 = 0)))))
% 16.72/3.08  | 
% 16.72/3.08  | BETA: splitting (20) gives:
% 16.72/3.08  | 
% 16.72/3.08  | Case 1:
% 16.72/3.08  | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | |   (32)   ~ (all_110_0 = 0)
% 16.72/3.08  | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | | BETA: splitting (23) gives:
% 16.72/3.08  | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | | Case 1:
% 16.72/3.08  | | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | | |   (33)  all_110_0 = 0
% 16.72/3.08  | | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | | | REDUCE: (32), (33) imply:
% 16.72/3.08  | | |   (34)  $false
% 16.72/3.08  | | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | | | CLOSE: (34) is inconsistent.
% 16.72/3.08  | | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | | Case 2:
% 16.72/3.08  | | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | | |   (35)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0, all_110_1) = v1
% 16.72/3.08  | | |           & in(v0, all_110_2) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 16.72/3.08  | | | 
% 16.72/3.08  | | | DELTA: instantiating (35) with fresh symbols all_155_0, all_155_1 gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (36)   ~ (all_155_0 = 0) & in(all_155_1, all_110_1) = all_155_0 &
% 16.72/3.09  | | |         in(all_155_1, all_110_2) = 0 & $i(all_155_1)
% 16.72/3.09  | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | ALPHA: (36) implies:
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (37)   ~ (all_155_0 = 0)
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (38)  $i(all_155_1)
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (39)  in(all_155_1, all_110_2) = 0
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (40)  in(all_155_1, all_110_1) = all_155_0
% 16.72/3.09  | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (29) with all_155_1, simplifying with (38),
% 16.72/3.09  | | |              (39) gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (41)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_155_1 &
% 16.72/3.09  | | |           in(v1, all_110_8) = 0 & in(v0, all_110_6) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 16.72/3.09  | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (31) with all_155_1, all_155_0, simplifying
% 16.72/3.09  | | |              with (38), (40) gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (42)  all_155_0 = 0 |  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0,
% 16.72/3.09  | | |               v1) = all_155_1) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ?
% 16.72/3.09  | | |           [v3: any] : (in(v1, all_110_7) = v3 & in(v0, all_110_6) = v2 & (
% 16.72/3.09  | | |               ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0))))
% 16.72/3.09  | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | DELTA: instantiating (41) with fresh symbols all_166_0, all_166_1 gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (43)  ordered_pair(all_166_1, all_166_0) = all_155_1 & in(all_166_0,
% 16.72/3.09  | | |           all_110_8) = 0 & in(all_166_1, all_110_6) = 0 & $i(all_166_0) &
% 16.72/3.09  | | |         $i(all_166_1)
% 16.72/3.09  | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | ALPHA: (43) implies:
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (44)  $i(all_166_1)
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (45)  $i(all_166_0)
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (46)  in(all_166_1, all_110_6) = 0
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (47)  in(all_166_0, all_110_8) = 0
% 16.72/3.09  | | |   (48)  ordered_pair(all_166_1, all_166_0) = all_155_1
% 16.72/3.09  | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | BETA: splitting (42) gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | Case 1:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (49)  all_155_0 = 0
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | REDUCE: (37), (49) imply:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (50)  $false
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | CLOSE: (50) is inconsistent.
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | Case 2:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (51)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) =
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |             all_155_1) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |             any] : (in(v1, all_110_7) = v3 & in(v0, all_110_6) = v2 & (
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |               ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0))))
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_166_0, simplifying with (45),
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |              (47) gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (52)  in(all_166_0, all_110_7) = 0
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (51) with all_166_1, all_166_0, simplifying
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |              with (44), (45), (48) gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (53)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (in(all_166_0, all_110_7) = v1 &
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |           in(all_166_1, all_110_6) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (53) with fresh symbols all_189_0, all_189_1 gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (54)  in(all_166_0, all_110_7) = all_189_0 & in(all_166_1, all_110_6)
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |         = all_189_1 & ( ~ (all_189_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_189_1 = 0))
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | ALPHA: (54) implies:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (55)  in(all_166_1, all_110_6) = all_189_1
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (56)  in(all_166_0, all_110_7) = all_189_0
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (57)   ~ (all_189_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_189_1 = 0)
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 0, all_189_1, all_110_6, all_166_1,
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |              simplifying with (46), (55) gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (58)  all_189_1 = 0
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 0, all_189_0, all_110_7, all_166_0,
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |              simplifying with (52), (56) gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | |   (59)  all_189_0 = 0
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | BETA: splitting (57) gives:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | Case 1:
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | |   (60)   ~ (all_189_0 = 0)
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | | 
% 16.72/3.09  | | | | | REDUCE: (59), (60) imply:
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | |   (61)  $false
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | CLOSE: (61) is inconsistent.
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | Case 2:
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | |   (62)   ~ (all_189_1 = 0)
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | REDUCE: (58), (62) imply:
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | |   (63)  $false
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | CLOSE: (63) is inconsistent.
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | End of split
% 16.72/3.10  | | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | End of split
% 16.72/3.10  | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | End of split
% 16.72/3.10  | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | Case 2:
% 16.72/3.10  | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | |   (64)   ~ (all_110_3 = 0)
% 16.72/3.10  | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | BETA: splitting (22) gives:
% 16.72/3.10  | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | Case 1:
% 16.72/3.10  | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | |   (65)  all_110_3 = 0
% 16.72/3.10  | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | REDUCE: (64), (65) imply:
% 16.72/3.10  | | |   (66)  $false
% 16.72/3.10  | | | 
% 16.72/3.10  | | | CLOSE: (66) is inconsistent.
% 16.72/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | Case 2:
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (67)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: int] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0, all_110_4) = v1
% 17.22/3.10  | | |           & in(v0, all_110_5) = 0 & $i(v0))
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | DELTA: instantiating (67) with fresh symbols all_155_0, all_155_1 gives:
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (68)   ~ (all_155_0 = 0) & in(all_155_1, all_110_4) = all_155_0 &
% 17.22/3.10  | | |         in(all_155_1, all_110_5) = 0 & $i(all_155_1)
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | ALPHA: (68) implies:
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (69)   ~ (all_155_0 = 0)
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (70)  $i(all_155_1)
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (71)  in(all_155_1, all_110_5) = 0
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (72)  in(all_155_1, all_110_4) = all_155_0
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (25) with all_155_1, simplifying with (70),
% 17.22/3.10  | | |              (71) gives:
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (73)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (ordered_pair(v0, v1) = all_155_1 &
% 17.22/3.10  | | |           in(v1, all_110_6) = 0 & in(v0, all_110_8) = 0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0))
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (27) with all_155_1, all_155_0, simplifying
% 17.22/3.10  | | |              with (70), (72) gives:
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (74)  all_155_0 = 0 |  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0,
% 17.22/3.10  | | |               v1) = all_155_1) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ?
% 17.22/3.10  | | |           [v3: any] : (in(v1, all_110_6) = v3 & in(v0, all_110_7) = v2 & (
% 17.22/3.10  | | |               ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0))))
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | DELTA: instantiating (73) with fresh symbols all_167_0, all_167_1 gives:
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (75)  ordered_pair(all_167_1, all_167_0) = all_155_1 & in(all_167_0,
% 17.22/3.10  | | |           all_110_6) = 0 & in(all_167_1, all_110_8) = 0 & $i(all_167_0) &
% 17.22/3.10  | | |         $i(all_167_1)
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | ALPHA: (75) implies:
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (76)  $i(all_167_1)
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (77)  $i(all_167_0)
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (78)  in(all_167_1, all_110_8) = 0
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (79)  in(all_167_0, all_110_6) = 0
% 17.22/3.10  | | |   (80)  ordered_pair(all_167_1, all_167_0) = all_155_1
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | BETA: splitting (74) gives:
% 17.22/3.10  | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | Case 1:
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |   (81)  all_155_0 = 0
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | REDUCE: (69), (81) imply:
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |   (82)  $false
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | CLOSE: (82) is inconsistent.
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | Case 2:
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |   (83)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (ordered_pair(v0, v1) =
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |             all_155_1) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ? [v2: any] :  ? [v3:
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |             any] : (in(v1, all_110_6) = v3 & in(v0, all_110_7) = v2 & (
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |               ~ (v3 = 0) |  ~ (v2 = 0))))
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (21) with all_167_1, simplifying with (76),
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |              (78) gives:
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |   (84)  in(all_167_1, all_110_7) = 0
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.10  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (83) with all_167_1, all_167_0, simplifying
% 17.22/3.10  | | | |              with (76), (77), (80) gives:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |   (85)   ? [v0: any] :  ? [v1: any] : (in(all_167_0, all_110_6) = v1 &
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |           in(all_167_1, all_110_7) = v0 & ( ~ (v1 = 0) |  ~ (v0 = 0)))
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | DELTA: instantiating (85) with fresh symbols all_190_0, all_190_1 gives:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |   (86)  in(all_167_0, all_110_6) = all_190_0 & in(all_167_1, all_110_7)
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |         = all_190_1 & ( ~ (all_190_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_190_1 = 0))
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | ALPHA: (86) implies:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |   (87)  in(all_167_1, all_110_7) = all_190_1
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |   (88)  in(all_167_0, all_110_6) = all_190_0
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |   (89)   ~ (all_190_0 = 0) |  ~ (all_190_1 = 0)
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 0, all_190_1, all_110_7, all_167_1,
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |              simplifying with (84), (87) gives:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |   (90)  all_190_1 = 0
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with 0, all_190_0, all_110_6, all_167_0,
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |              simplifying with (79), (88) gives:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | |   (91)  all_190_0 = 0
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | BETA: splitting (89) gives:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | Case 1:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | |   (92)   ~ (all_190_0 = 0)
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | REDUCE: (91), (92) imply:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | |   (93)  $false
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | CLOSE: (93) is inconsistent.
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | Case 2:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | |   (94)   ~ (all_190_1 = 0)
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | REDUCE: (90), (94) imply:
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | |   (95)  $false
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | CLOSE: (95) is inconsistent.
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | End of split
% 17.22/3.11  | | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | | End of split
% 17.22/3.11  | | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | | End of split
% 17.22/3.11  | | 
% 17.22/3.11  | End of split
% 17.22/3.11  | 
% 17.22/3.11  End of proof
% 17.33/3.11  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 17.33/3.11  
% 17.33/3.11  2452ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------