TSTP Solution File: SEU165+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU165+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:17:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   38 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  32   ~;  33   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   73 (  14 sgn  30   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d5_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d5_tarski) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,lemma,
    ! [X1] : unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(t106_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t106_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(l55_zfmisc_1,lemma,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    <=> ( in(X1,X3)
        & in(X2,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',l55_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X4),singleton(X3)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d5_tarski]) ).

fof(c_0_6,lemma,
    ! [X2] : unordered_pair(X2,X2) = singleton(X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
      <=> ( in(X1,X3)
          & in(X2,X4) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t106_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,lemma,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( in(X5,X7)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( in(X6,X8)
        | ~ in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)) )
      & ( ~ in(X5,X7)
        | ~ in(X6,X8)
        | in(ordered_pair(X5,X6),cartesian_product2(X7,X8)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[l55_zfmisc_1])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,lemma,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
      | ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | ~ in(esk2_0,esk4_0) )
    & ( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
      | in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) )
    & ( in(esk2_0,esk4_0)
      | in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,lemma,
    ( in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : unordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(X4,X3),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
    | in(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,lemma,
    ( in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0)),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,lemma,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(ordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
    | in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ in(esk2_0,esk4_0)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0)),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,lemma,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X3),unordered_pair(X3,X3)),cartesian_product2(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk1_0),unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0)),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
    | in(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,lemma,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk2_0),unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0)),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk1_0),unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0)),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
    | ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0)
    | ~ in(esk2_0,esk4_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk2_0,esk4_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,lemma,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X3,X1),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),cartesian_product2(X2,X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk1_0),unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0)),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
    | in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,lemma,
    ( in(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk1_0),unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0)),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0))
    | ~ in(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk1_0,esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,lemma,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),unordered_pair(X1,X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk2_0,esk1_0),unordered_pair(esk1_0,esk1_0)),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk4_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,lemma,
    ( in(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X2),unordered_pair(X2,X2)),cartesian_product2(X3,X4))
    | ~ in(X1,X4)
    | ~ in(X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_28]),c_0_33])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU165+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 21:15:44 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.022 s
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 38
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 27
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 17
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 14
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 9
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 17
% 0.24/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 95
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 26
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 123
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 120
% 0.24/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 765
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 47
% 0.24/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 444
% 0.24/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 274
% 0.24/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 102
% 0.24/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 36
% 0.24/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 3359
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2485
% 0.24/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 79
% 0.24/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 3215
% 0.24/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 14
% 0.24/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 130
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 231
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 49
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.24/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 20
% 0.24/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 159
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1615
% 0.24/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 4542
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 41
% 0.24/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11963
% 0.24/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9376
% 0.24/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 391
% 0.24/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1664
% 0.24/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 62
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 24
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 31364
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42  # User time                : 0.098 s
% 0.24/1.42  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Total time               : 0.099 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 5108 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------