TSTP Solution File: SEU162+3 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : SEU162+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:18:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 1.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SEU162+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Wed Aug 23 17:26:04 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.56/1.05  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/1.05  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.56/1.05  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.56/1.05  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.56/1.05  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.56/1.05  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  % Result      :Theorem 0.420000s
% 0.56/1.05  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.420000s
% 0.56/1.05  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/1.05  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/1.05  % File     : SEU162+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.56/1.05  % Domain   : Set theory
% 0.56/1.05  % Problem  : Basic properties of sets, theorem 65
% 0.56/1.05  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.56/1.05  % English  :
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  % Refs     : [Byl90] Bylinski (1990), Some Basic Properties of Sets
% 0.56/1.05  %          : [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.56/1.05  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.56/1.05  % Names    : zfmisc_1__t65_zfmisc_1 [Urb06]
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.56/1.05  % Rating   : 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.14 v7.5.0, 0.16 v7.4.0, 0.07 v7.2.0, 0.03 v7.1.0, 0.04 v7.0.0, 0.03 v6.4.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.12 v6.1.0, 0.13 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.19 v5.2.0, 0.05 v5.0.0, 0.04 v4.1.0, 0.09 v4.0.1, 0.13 v4.0.0, 0.12 v3.7.0, 0.05 v3.4.0, 0.11 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0
% 0.56/1.05  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   2 unt;   0 def)
% 0.56/1.05  %            Number of atoms       :   14 (   2 equ)
% 0.56/1.05  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/1.05  %            Number of connectives :   11 (   5   ~;   0   |;   1   &)
% 0.56/1.05  %                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.56/1.05  %            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   4 avg)
% 0.56/1.05  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.56/1.05  %            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.56/1.05  %            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   0 con; 1-2 aty)
% 0.56/1.05  %            Number of variables   :   14 (  12   !;   2   ?)
% 0.56/1.05  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.56/1.05  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.56/1.05  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/1.05  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.56/1.05      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/1.05        ( in(A,B)
% 0.56/1.05       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  fof(l25_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.56/1.05      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/1.05        ~ ( disjoint(singleton(A),B)
% 0.56/1.05          & in(A,B) ) ).
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  fof(l28_zfmisc_1,axiom,
% 0.56/1.05      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/1.05        ( ~ in(A,B)
% 0.56/1.05       => disjoint(singleton(A),B) ) ).
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.56/1.05      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.56/1.05      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  fof(symmetry_r1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.56/1.05      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/1.05        ( disjoint(A,B)
% 0.56/1.05       => disjoint(B,A) ) ).
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  fof(t65_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
% 0.56/1.05      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/1.05        ( set_difference(A,singleton(B)) = A
% 0.56/1.05      <=> ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  fof(t83_xboole_1,axiom,
% 0.56/1.05      ! [A,B] :
% 0.56/1.05        ( disjoint(A,B)
% 0.56/1.05      <=> set_difference(A,B) = A ) ).
% 0.56/1.05  
% 0.56/1.05  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.56/1.05  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/1.05  % Proof found
% 0.56/1.05  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/1.05  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.56/1.05  %ClaNum:21(EqnAxiom:11)
% 0.56/1.05  %VarNum:26(SingletonVarNum:12)
% 0.56/1.05  %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.56/1.05  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 0.56/1.05  %SharedTerms:12
% 0.56/1.05  %goalClause: 14 16
% 0.56/1.05  [12]P1(a1)
% 0.56/1.05  [13]~P1(a2)
% 0.56/1.05  [14]~P3(a4,a3)+E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)
% 0.56/1.06  [16]P3(a4,a3)+~E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)
% 0.56/1.06  [17]~P2(x172,x171)+P2(x171,x172)
% 0.56/1.06  [20]~P3(x202,x201)+~P3(x201,x202)
% 0.56/1.06  [15]P3(x151,x152)+P2(f5(x151),x152)
% 0.56/1.06  [18]~P2(x181,x182)+E(f6(x181,x182),x181)
% 0.56/1.06  [19]P2(x191,x192)+~E(f6(x191,x192),x191)
% 0.56/1.06  [21]~P3(x211,x212)+~P2(f5(x211),x212)
% 0.56/1.06  %EqnAxiom
% 0.56/1.06  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.56/1.06  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.56/1.06  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.56/1.06  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f5(x41),f5(x42))
% 0.56/1.06  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f6(x51,x53),f6(x52,x53))
% 0.56/1.06  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x63,x61),f6(x63,x62))
% 0.56/1.06  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(x72)+~E(x71,x72)
% 0.56/1.06  [8]P2(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83)
% 0.56/1.06  [9]P2(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91)
% 0.56/1.06  [10]P3(x102,x103)+~E(x101,x102)+~P3(x101,x103)
% 0.56/1.06  [11]P3(x113,x112)+~E(x111,x112)+~P3(x113,x111)
% 0.56/1.06  
% 0.56/1.06  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(25,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (~P2(x251,x252)+E(f6(x252,x251),x252)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[17,18])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(26,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (~P3(x261,x262)+P2(f5(x262),x261)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,15])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(32,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (~P2(f5(a4),a3)+~E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,16])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(51,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (P3(x511,a3)+~E(a4,x511)+~E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[10,16])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(57,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (~E(x571,a4)+P3(x571,a3)+~E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[51,2])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(58,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (~P3(a3,x581)+~E(x581,a4)+~E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[57,20])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(84,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (E(x841,f6(x841,x842))+~P2(x841,x842)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,18])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(85,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (E(f5(x851),f6(f5(x851),x852))+P3(x851,x852)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[84,15])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(92,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (E(x921,f6(x921,x922))+~P2(x922,x921)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,25])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(93,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (E(x931,f6(x931,f5(x932)))+P3(x932,x931)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[92,15])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(94,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (E(a3,f6(a3,f5(a4)))+E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[93,14])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(139,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (E(f6(a3,f5(a4)),a3)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,94])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(140,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (P3(a4,a3)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[139,16])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(141,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (~P2(f5(a4),a3)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[139,32])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(145,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (~E(x1451,a4)+~P3(a3,x1451)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[139,58])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(154,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (P2(a3,f5(a4))),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[139,19])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(183,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     (~P3(a3,a4)),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(equality_inference,[],[145])).
% 0.56/1.06  cnf(209,plain,
% 0.56/1.06     ($false),
% 0.56/1.06     inference(scs_inference,[],[154,140,141,183,93,92,85,26,17]),
% 0.56/1.06     ['proof']).
% 0.56/1.06  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.56/1.06  % Total time :0.420000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------