TSTP Solution File: SEU159+3 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SEU159+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:47:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.86s 1.68s
% Output   : Proof 4.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SEU159+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 00:50:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.50/0.62          ____       _                          
% 0.50/0.62    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.50/0.62   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.50/0.62  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.50/0.62  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.50/0.62  
% 0.50/0.62  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.50/0.62  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.50/0.62  
% 0.50/0.62  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.50/0.62  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.50/0.62  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.50/0.62  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.50/0.62  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.50/0.62  
% 0.50/0.62  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.50/0.62  
% 0.50/0.62  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.77/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.44/0.94  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 1.74/1.09  Prover 0: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 1.74/1.11  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 2.54/1.35  Prover 0: gave up
% 2.54/1.35  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 2.72/1.37  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.72/1.43  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 2.72/1.43  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.22/1.53  Prover 1: gave up
% 3.22/1.53  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.38/1.54  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.42/1.59  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 3.42/1.59  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 3.69/1.68  Prover 2: proved (149ms)
% 3.69/1.68  
% 3.69/1.68  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 3.86/1.68  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 3.86/1.68  
% 3.86/1.68  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 4.48/1.89  found it (size 43)
% 4.48/1.89  
% 4.48/1.89  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 4.48/1.89  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 4.48/1.89  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : ( ~ (v8 = 0) & empty(v9) = 0 & empty(v7) = v8 & subset(v3, v2) = v4 & unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v3 &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = v11 | v13 = v10 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v10, v11) = v12) |  ~ (in(v13, v12) = 0)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (in(v12, v11) = v13) |  ? [v14] : ( ~ (v14 = 0) & in(v12, v10) = v14)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v10, v11) = v12) |  ~ (in(v11, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = 0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v10, v11) = v12) |  ~ (in(v10, v12) = v13)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (subset(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (subset(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (in(v13, v12) = v11) |  ~ (in(v13, v12) = v10)) &  ? [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] :  ! [v13] : (v13 = v10 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v11, v12) = v13) |  ? [v14] :  ? [v15] : ((v14 = v12 | v14 = v11 | (v15 = 0 & in(v14, v10) = 0)) & (( ~ (v15 = 0) & in(v14, v10) = v15) | ( ~ (v14 = v12) &  ~ (v14 = v11))))) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v12 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v10, v11) = v12) |  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : ( ~ (v14 = 0) & in(v13, v11) = v14 & in(v13, v10) = 0)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : (v11 = v10 |  ~ (empty(v12) = v11) |  ~ (empty(v12) = v10)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (subset(v10, v11) = 0) |  ~ (in(v12, v10) = 0) | in(v12, v11) = 0) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v11, v10) = v12) | unordered_pair(v10, v11) = v12) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] :  ! [v12] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v10, v11) = v12) | unordered_pair(v11, v10) = v12) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : (v11 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v10, v10) = v11)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (in(v11, v10) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & in(v10, v11) = v12)) &  ! [v10] :  ! [v11] : ( ~ (in(v10, v11) = 0) |  ? [v12] : ( ~ (v12 = 0) & in(v11, v10) = v12)) &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : subset(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : unordered_pair(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : in(v11, v10) = v12 &  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : empty(v10) = v11 & ((v6 = 0 & v5 = 0 &  ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v1, v2) = 0 & in(v0, v2) = 0) | (v4 = 0 & (( ~ (v6 = 0) & in(v1, v2) = v6) | ( ~ (v5 = 0) & in(v0, v2) = v5)))))
% 4.82/1.93  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, all_0_5_5, all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 yields:
% 4.82/1.93  | (1)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0) & empty(all_0_0_0) = 0 & empty(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1 & subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_5_5 & unordered_pair(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_6_6 &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v1 | v3 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (in(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v2, v0) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (in(v1, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (in(v0, v2) = v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v4 = v2 | v4 = v1 | (v5 = 0 & in(v4, v0) = 0)) & (( ~ (v5 = 0) & in(v4, v0) = v5) | ( ~ (v4 = v2) &  ~ (v4 = v1))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (in(v2, v0) = 0) | in(v2, v1) = 0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2) | unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v0) = v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & in(v0, v1) = v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & in(v1, v0) = v2)) &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : subset(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : in(v1, v0) = v2 &  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : empty(v0) = v1 & ((all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_5_5 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0 & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_5_5 = 0 & (( ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3) | ( ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0) & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))))
% 4.82/1.93  |
% 4.82/1.93  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 4.82/1.93  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (empty(v2) = v1) |  ~ (empty(v2) = v0))
% 4.82/1.93  | (3)  ~ (all_0_1_1 = 0)
% 4.82/1.93  | (4)  ? [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v1, v2) = v3) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] : ((v4 = v2 | v4 = v1 | (v5 = 0 & in(v4, v0) = 0)) & (( ~ (v5 = 0) & in(v4, v0) = v5) | ( ~ (v4 = v2) &  ~ (v4 = v1)))))
% 4.82/1.93  | (5)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : in(v1, v0) = v2
% 4.82/1.93  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (in(v2, v0) = 0) | in(v2, v1) = 0)
% 4.82/1.93  | (7)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2
% 4.82/1.93  | (8)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = v0))
% 4.82/1.94  | (9)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : subset(v1, v0) = v2
% 4.82/1.94  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v2 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = v2) |  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v3, v1) = v4 & in(v3, v0) = 0))
% 4.82/1.94  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v1) = 0) |  ~ (in(v2, v1) = v3) |  ? [v4] : ( ~ (v4 = 0) & in(v2, v0) = v4))
% 4.82/1.94  | (12) subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_5_5
% 4.82/1.94  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (in(v1, v2) = v3))
% 4.82/1.94  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v1 | v3 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (in(v3, v2) = 0))
% 4.82/1.94  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v0, v1) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & in(v1, v0) = v2))
% 4.82/1.94  | (16) unordered_pair(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_6_6
% 4.82/1.94  | (17)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = 0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ (in(v0, v2) = v3))
% 4.82/1.94  | (18)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (subset(v3, v2) = v0))
% 4.82/1.94  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (unordered_pair(v3, v2) = v0))
% 4.82/1.94  | (20)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : empty(v0) = v1
% 4.82/1.94  | (21)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (in(v1, v0) = 0) |  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = 0) & in(v0, v1) = v2))
% 4.82/1.94  | (22) (all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_5_5 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0 & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0) | (all_0_5_5 = 0 & (( ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3) | ( ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0) & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)))
% 4.82/1.94  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = 0 |  ~ (subset(v0, v0) = v1))
% 4.82/1.94  | (24) empty(all_0_2_2) = all_0_1_1
% 4.82/1.94  | (25) empty(all_0_0_0) = 0
% 4.82/1.94  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2) | unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2)
% 4.82/1.94  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (unordered_pair(v1, v0) = v2) | unordered_pair(v0, v1) = v2)
% 4.82/1.94  |
% 4.82/1.94  | Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_5_5, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = all_0_5_5, yields:
% 4.82/1.94  | (28) all_0_5_5 = 0 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & in(v0, all_0_7_7) = v1)
% 4.82/1.94  |
% 4.82/1.94  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (22), into two cases.
% 4.82/1.94  |-Branch one:
% 4.82/1.94  | (29) all_0_3_3 = 0 & all_0_4_4 = 0 &  ~ (all_0_5_5 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0 & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 4.82/1.94  |
% 4.82/1.94  	| Applying alpha-rule on (29) yields:
% 4.82/1.94  	| (30) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 4.82/1.94  	| (31)  ~ (all_0_5_5 = 0)
% 4.82/1.94  	| (32) in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 4.82/1.94  	| (33) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 4.82/1.94  	| (34) in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 4.82/1.94  	|
% 4.82/1.94  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (28), into two cases.
% 4.82/1.94  	|-Branch one:
% 4.82/1.94  	| (35) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 4.82/1.94  	|
% 4.82/1.94  		| Equations (35) can reduce 31 to:
% 4.82/1.94  		| (36) $false
% 4.82/1.94  		|
% 4.82/1.94  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 4.82/1.94  	|-Branch two:
% 4.82/1.94  	| (31)  ~ (all_0_5_5 = 0)
% 4.82/1.94  	| (38)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = 0) & in(v0, all_0_6_6) = 0 & in(v0, all_0_7_7) = v1)
% 4.82/1.95  	|
% 4.82/1.95  		| Instantiating (38) with all_30_0_22, all_30_1_23 yields:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (39)  ~ (all_30_0_22 = 0) & in(all_30_1_23, all_0_6_6) = 0 & in(all_30_1_23, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_22
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  		| Applying alpha-rule on (39) yields:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (40)  ~ (all_30_0_22 = 0)
% 4.82/1.95  		| (41) in(all_30_1_23, all_0_6_6) = 0
% 4.82/1.95  		| (42) in(all_30_1_23, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_22
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  		| Instantiating formula (14) with all_30_1_23, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms unordered_pair(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_6_6, in(all_30_1_23, all_0_6_6) = 0, yields:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (43) all_30_1_23 = all_0_8_8 | all_30_1_23 = all_0_9_9
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (43), into two cases.
% 4.82/1.95  		|-Branch one:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (44) all_30_1_23 = all_0_8_8
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  			| From (44) and (42) follows:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (45) in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_22
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_30_0_22, 0 and discharging atoms in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_22, in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (46) all_30_0_22 = 0
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Equations (46) can reduce 40 to:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (36) $false
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 4.82/1.95  		|-Branch two:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (48)  ~ (all_30_1_23 = all_0_8_8)
% 4.82/1.95  		| (49) all_30_1_23 = all_0_9_9
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  			| From (49) and (42) follows:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (50) in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_22
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Instantiating formula (8) with all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_30_0_22, 0 and discharging atoms in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_30_0_22, in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = 0, yields:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (46) all_30_0_22 = 0
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Equations (46) can reduce 40 to:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (36) $false
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 4.82/1.95  |-Branch two:
% 4.82/1.95  | (53) all_0_5_5 = 0 & (( ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3) | ( ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0) & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4))
% 4.82/1.95  |
% 4.82/1.95  	| Applying alpha-rule on (53) yields:
% 4.82/1.95  	| (35) all_0_5_5 = 0
% 4.82/1.95  	| (55) ( ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3) | ( ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0) & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4)
% 4.82/1.95  	|
% 4.82/1.95  	| From (35) and (12) follows:
% 4.82/1.95  	| (56) subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = 0
% 4.82/1.95  	|
% 4.82/1.95  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (55), into two cases.
% 4.82/1.95  	|-Branch one:
% 4.82/1.95  	| (57)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3
% 4.82/1.95  	|
% 4.82/1.95  		| Applying alpha-rule on (57) yields:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (58)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 4.82/1.95  		| (59) in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  		| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_3_3, all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = 0, in(all_0_8_8, all_0_7_7) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (60) all_0_3_3 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0)
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (60), into two cases.
% 4.82/1.95  		|-Branch one:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (30) all_0_3_3 = 0
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Equations (30) can reduce 58 to:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (36) $false
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 4.82/1.95  		|-Branch two:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (58)  ~ (all_0_3_3 = 0)
% 4.82/1.95  		| (64)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = v0)
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Instantiating (64) with all_47_0_27 yields:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (65)  ~ (all_47_0_27 = 0) & in(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_27
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Applying alpha-rule on (65) yields:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (66)  ~ (all_47_0_27 = 0)
% 4.82/1.95  			| (67) in(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_27
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Instantiating formula (13) with all_47_0_27, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms unordered_pair(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_6_6, in(all_0_8_8, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_27, yields:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (68) all_47_0_27 = 0
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			| Equations (68) can reduce 66 to:
% 4.82/1.95  			| (36) $false
% 4.82/1.95  			|
% 4.82/1.95  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 4.82/1.95  	|-Branch two:
% 4.82/1.95  	| (70)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0) & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 4.82/1.95  	|
% 4.82/1.95  		| Applying alpha-rule on (70) yields:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (71)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 4.82/1.95  		| (72) in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4
% 4.82/1.95  		|
% 4.82/1.95  		| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_4_4, all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7, all_0_6_6 and discharging atoms subset(all_0_6_6, all_0_7_7) = 0, in(all_0_9_9, all_0_7_7) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 4.82/1.95  		| (73) all_0_4_4 = 0 |  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0)
% 4.82/1.96  		|
% 4.82/1.96  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (73), into two cases.
% 4.82/1.96  		|-Branch one:
% 4.82/1.96  		| (33) all_0_4_4 = 0
% 4.82/1.96  		|
% 4.82/1.96  			| Equations (33) can reduce 71 to:
% 4.82/1.96  			| (36) $false
% 4.82/1.96  			|
% 4.82/1.96  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 4.82/1.96  		|-Branch two:
% 4.82/1.96  		| (71)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = 0)
% 4.82/1.96  		| (77)  ? [v0] : ( ~ (v0 = 0) & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = v0)
% 4.82/1.96  		|
% 4.82/1.96  			| Instantiating (77) with all_47_0_28 yields:
% 4.82/1.96  			| (78)  ~ (all_47_0_28 = 0) & in(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_28
% 4.82/1.96  			|
% 4.82/1.96  			| Applying alpha-rule on (78) yields:
% 4.82/1.96  			| (79)  ~ (all_47_0_28 = 0)
% 4.82/1.96  			| (80) in(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_28
% 4.82/1.96  			|
% 4.82/1.96  			| Instantiating formula (17) with all_47_0_28, all_0_6_6, all_0_8_8, all_0_9_9 and discharging atoms unordered_pair(all_0_9_9, all_0_8_8) = all_0_6_6, in(all_0_9_9, all_0_6_6) = all_47_0_28, yields:
% 4.82/1.96  			| (81) all_47_0_28 = 0
% 4.82/1.96  			|
% 4.82/1.96  			| Equations (81) can reduce 79 to:
% 4.82/1.96  			| (36) $false
% 4.82/1.96  			|
% 4.82/1.96  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 4.82/1.96  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 4.82/1.96  
% 4.82/1.96  1326ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------