TSTP Solution File: SEU151+1 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SEU151+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:04:43 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 1.88s 1.17s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  25 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  141 ( 105 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   14 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  161 (  66   ~;  55   |;  36   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (   2 sgn  60   !;  12   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ( X1 = X3
            | X0 = X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(f5,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ~ ( X0 != X3
        & X0 != X2
        & unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t10_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ~ ( X0 != X3
          & X0 != X2
          & unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X0 != X3
      & X0 != X2
      & unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 ) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | ~ in(X3,X2) ) )
        | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f10,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X3] :
            ( ( in(X3,X2)
              | ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 ) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | ~ in(X3,X2) ) )
        | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
        | ? [X3] :
            ( ( ( X1 != X3
                & X0 != X3 )
              | ~ in(X3,X2) )
            & ( X1 = X3
              | X0 = X3
              | in(X3,X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X4] :
            ( ( in(X4,X2)
              | ( X1 != X4
                & X0 != X4 ) )
            & ( X1 = X4
              | X0 = X4
              | ~ in(X4,X2) ) )
        | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ? [X3] :
          ( ( ( X1 != X3
              & X0 != X3 )
            | ~ in(X3,X2) )
          & ( X1 = X3
            | X0 = X3
            | in(X3,X2) ) )
     => ( ( ( sK0(X0,X1,X2) != X1
            & sK0(X0,X1,X2) != X0 )
          | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X2) )
        & ( sK0(X0,X1,X2) = X1
          | sK0(X0,X1,X2) = X0
          | in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = X2
        | ( ( ( sK0(X0,X1,X2) != X1
              & sK0(X0,X1,X2) != X0 )
            | ~ in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X2) )
          & ( sK0(X0,X1,X2) = X1
            | sK0(X0,X1,X2) = X0
            | in(sK0(X0,X1,X2),X2) ) ) )
      & ( ! [X4] :
            ( ( in(X4,X2)
              | ( X1 != X4
                & X0 != X4 ) )
            & ( X1 = X4
              | X0 = X4
              | ~ in(X4,X2) ) )
        | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f11,f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
        ( X0 != X3
        & X0 != X2
        & unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3) )
   => ( sK1 != sK4
      & sK1 != sK3
      & unordered_pair(sK1,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( sK1 != sK4
    & sK1 != sK3
    & unordered_pair(sK1,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4])],[f8,f14]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f18,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( X1 = X4
      | X0 = X4
      | ~ in(X4,X2)
      | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( in(X4,X2)
      | X0 != X4
      | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1,X4] :
      ( in(X4,X2)
      | X1 != X4
      | unordered_pair(X0,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK1,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    sK1 != sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f26,plain,
    sK1 != sK4,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X4] :
      ( in(X4,X2)
      | unordered_pair(X0,X4) != X2 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    ! [X0,X4] : in(X4,unordered_pair(X0,X4)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f29,plain,
    ! [X2,X1,X4] :
      ( in(X4,X2)
      | unordered_pair(X4,X1) != X2 ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f19]) ).

fof(f30,plain,
    ! [X1,X4] : in(X4,unordered_pair(X4,X1)),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f31,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X4] :
      ( X1 = X4
      | X0 = X4
      | ~ in(X4,unordered_pair(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f18]) ).

cnf(c_50,plain,
    unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    in(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    in(X0,unordered_pair(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    | X0 = X1
    | X0 = X2 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

cnf(c_57,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK4,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

cnf(c_58,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK3,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

cnf(c_59,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK1,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK3,sK4),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK1,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK4,sK3),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_50]) ).

cnf(c_142,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK3,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).

cnf(c_143,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK4,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).

cnf(c_281,plain,
    in(sK3,unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_54]) ).

cnf(c_282,plain,
    in(sK4,unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_55]) ).

cnf(c_302,plain,
    ( sK1 = sK3
    | sK3 = sK2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_281,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_303,plain,
    ( sK1 = sK4
    | sK4 = sK2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_282,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_307,plain,
    sK4 = sK2,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_303,c_143]) ).

cnf(c_308,plain,
    sK3 = sK2,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_302,c_142]) ).

cnf(c_314,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK1,sK4) = unordered_pair(sK4,sK3),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_108,c_307]) ).

cnf(c_348,plain,
    sK4 = sK3,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_308,c_307]) ).

cnf(c_353,plain,
    unordered_pair(sK1,sK4) = unordered_pair(sK4,sK4),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_314,c_348]) ).

cnf(c_357,plain,
    ( ~ in(X0,unordered_pair(sK1,sK4))
    | X0 = sK4 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_372,plain,
    sK1 = sK4,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_357]) ).

cnf(c_373,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_372,c_143]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SEU151+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  2 17:18:19 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 1.88/1.17  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------  iProver source info
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 1.88/1.17  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 1.88/1.17  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Parsing...
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  clauses                                 11
% 1.88/1.17  conjectures                             2
% 1.88/1.17  EPR                                     3
% 1.88/1.17  Horn                                    9
% 1.88/1.17  unary                                   6
% 1.88/1.17  binary                                  1
% 1.88/1.17  lits                                    21
% 1.88/1.17  lits eq                                 13
% 1.88/1.17  fd_pure                                 0
% 1.88/1.17  fd_pseudo                               0
% 1.88/1.17  fd_cond                                 0
% 1.88/1.17  fd_pseudo_cond                          3
% 1.88/1.17  AC symbols                              0
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ 
% 1.88/1.17  Current options:
% 1.88/1.17  ------ 
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  ------ Proving...
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.88/1.17  
% 1.88/1.17  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------