TSTP Solution File: SEU149+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : SEU149+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:31:31 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   71 (  51 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  26   ~;  30   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   50 (   2 sgn  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t8_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3)
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t8_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(d1_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = singleton(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> X3 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_tarski) ).

fof(t69_enumset1,lemma,
    ! [X1] : unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t69_enumset1) ).

fof(d2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( X3 = unordered_pair(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X4] :
          ( in(X4,X3)
        <=> ( X4 = X1
            | X4 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2_tarski) ).

fof(commutativity_k2_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_tarski) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X2,X3)
       => X1 = X2 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t8_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( ~ in(X19,X18)
        | X19 = X17
        | X18 != singleton(X17) )
      & ( X20 != X17
        | in(X20,X18)
        | X18 != singleton(X17) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X21,X22),X22)
        | esk1_2(X21,X22) != X21
        | X22 = singleton(X21) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X21,X22),X22)
        | esk1_2(X21,X22) = X21
        | X22 = singleton(X21) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d1_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,lemma,
    ! [X159] : unordered_pair(X159,X159) = singleton(X159),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t69_enumset1]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X35,X36,X37,X38,X39,X40,X41,X42] :
      ( ( ~ in(X38,X37)
        | X38 = X35
        | X38 = X36
        | X37 != unordered_pair(X35,X36) )
      & ( X39 != X35
        | in(X39,X37)
        | X37 != unordered_pair(X35,X36) )
      & ( X39 != X36
        | in(X39,X37)
        | X37 != unordered_pair(X35,X36) )
      & ( esk4_3(X40,X41,X42) != X40
        | ~ in(esk4_3(X40,X41,X42),X42)
        | X42 = unordered_pair(X40,X41) )
      & ( esk4_3(X40,X41,X42) != X41
        | ~ in(esk4_3(X40,X41,X42),X42)
        | X42 = unordered_pair(X40,X41) )
      & ( in(esk4_3(X40,X41,X42),X42)
        | esk4_3(X40,X41,X42) = X40
        | esk4_3(X40,X41,X42) = X41
        | X42 = unordered_pair(X40,X41) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( singleton(esk14_0) = unordered_pair(esk15_0,esk16_0)
    & esk14_0 != esk15_0 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | ~ in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,lemma,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(X1,X3)
    | X1 != X2
    | X3 != unordered_pair(X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk14_0) = unordered_pair(esk15_0,esk16_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | X2 != unordered_pair(X3,X3)
    | ~ in(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    in(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk15_0,esk16_0) = unordered_pair(esk14_0,esk14_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk16_0,unordered_pair(esk14_0,esk14_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X9,X10] : unordered_pair(X9,X10) = unordered_pair(X10,X9),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_tarski]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    esk16_0 = esk14_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk14_0,esk15_0) = unordered_pair(esk14_0,esk14_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_20]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk15_0,unordered_pair(esk14_0,esk14_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    esk14_0 != esk15_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_23]),c_0_24]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.13  % Problem    : SEU149+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.05/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 16:11:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.52  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.22/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 22401 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.22/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I with pid 22408 completed with status 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I
% 0.22/0.52  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/0.52  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.22/0.52  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.22/0.52  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 811s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S059I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.22/0.52  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.22/0.52  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.52  # Proof found!
% 0.22/0.52  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.52  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.52  # Parsed axioms                        : 72
% 0.22/0.52  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Initial clauses                      : 117
% 0.22/0.52  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 9
% 0.22/0.52  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 108
% 0.22/0.52  # Processed clauses                    : 170
% 0.22/0.52  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.22/0.52  # ...subsumed                          : 16
% 0.22/0.52  # ...remaining for further processing  : 152
% 0.22/0.52  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 25
% 0.22/0.52  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.22/0.52  # Generated clauses                    : 59
% 0.22/0.52  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 44
% 0.22/0.52  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Paramodulations                      : 37
% 0.22/0.52  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Equation resolutions                 : 25
% 0.22/0.52  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Total rewrite steps                  : 24
% 0.22/0.52  # ...of those cached                   : 7
% 0.22/0.52  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.22/0.52  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.22/0.52  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/0.52  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.22/0.52  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/0.52  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.22/0.52  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.22/0.52  # Current number of processed clauses  : 31
% 0.22/0.52  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.22/0.52  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.22/0.52  #    Negative unit clauses             : 9
% 0.22/0.52  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.22/0.52  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76
% 0.22/0.52  # ...number of literals in the above   : 179
% 0.22/0.52  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Current number of archived clauses   : 101
% 0.22/0.52  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 888
% 0.22/0.52  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 684
% 0.22/0.52  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6
% 0.22/0.52  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.22/0.52  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 42
% 0.22/0.52  # BW rewrite match successes           : 28
% 0.22/0.52  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.22/0.52  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7018
% 0.22/0.52  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 1632
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.22/0.52  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.52  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.22/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 2064 pages
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.52  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/0.52  # User time                : 0.047 s
% 0.22/0.52  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.52  # Total time               : 0.055 s
% 0.22/0.52  # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.22/0.52  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------