TSTP Solution File: SEU146+1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SEU146+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:24:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU146+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 22:39:08 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.19/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.19/0.37 #
% 0.19/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/0.37 # Number of axioms: 18 Number of unprocessed: 16
% 0.19/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.19/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.19/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.19/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.19/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.19/0.37 # 16 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.19/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
% 0.19/0.37 # There are 3 start rule candidates:
% 0.19/0.37 # Found 5 unit axioms.
% 0.19/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.19/0.37 # 3 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.19/0.37 # 11 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.19/0.37 # 5 unit axiom clauses
% 0.19/0.37
% 0.19/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.19/0.37 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 2 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 2 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.19/0.38 # There were 2 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.19/0.38 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.19/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_8, plain, (empty(empty_set))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (subset(empty_set,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (empty(esk3_0))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (subset(X1,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (~empty(esk4_0))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0!=empty_set|~subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (singleton(esk2_0)!=esk1_0|~subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (singleton(esk2_0)=esk1_0|esk1_0=empty_set|subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~in(X1,X2)|~in(X2,X1))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_21, plain, (X1=empty_set|~subset(X1,empty_set))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (subset(X1,X2)|set_difference(X1,X2)!=empty_set)).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_9, plain, (subset(singleton(X1),X2)|~in(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (set_difference(X1,X2)=empty_set|~subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_10, plain, (in(X1,X2)|~subset(singleton(X1),X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (X1=X2|~subset(X2,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_11, plain, (subset(X1,set_difference(X2,singleton(X3)))|in(X3,X1)|~subset(X1,X2))).
% 0.19/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.19/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.19/0.38 # Found 5 steps
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (esk1_0!=empty_set|~subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0))), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_30, plain, (~subset(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_20])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_186, plain, (set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0))!=empty_set), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_21])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_29, plain, (esk1_0!=empty_set), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_29, ...])).
% 0.19/0.38 cnf(i_0_209, plain, (~subset(set_difference(esk1_0,singleton(esk2_0)),empty_set)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_209, ...])).
% 0.19/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.19/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.19/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.19/0.38 # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.19/0.38 # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on
% 0.19/0.38 # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.19/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.19/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------