TSTP Solution File: SEU144+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SEU144+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:34:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.43s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (   8 unt;   4 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   41 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(2,axiom,
    ( in(skc2,skc3)
    | subset(singleton(skc2),skc3) ),
    file('SEU144+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( subset(u,v)
    | in(skf3(v,u),u) ),
    file('SEU144+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ in(skc2,skc3)
    | ~ subset(singleton(skc2),skc3) ),
    file('SEU144+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ in(skf3(u,v),u)
    | subset(w,u) ),
    file('SEU144+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ subset(v,w)
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('SEU144+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(v,singleton(w))
    | equal(u,w) ),
    file('SEU144+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | ~ equal(w,singleton(v))
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('SEU144+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,plain,
    in(skc2,skc3),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[2]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:2.0')] ).

cnf(13,plain,
    ~ subset(singleton(skc2),skc3),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[5,12]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:5.0,12.0')] ).

cnf(20,plain,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | in(u,singleton(v)) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:9.1')] ).

cnf(22,plain,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | ~ subset(singleton(v),w)
    | in(u,w) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[20,7]),
    [iquote('0:Res:20.1,7.0')] ).

cnf(27,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,singleton(v))
    | equal(u,v) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[8]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:8.1')] ).

cnf(29,plain,
    ( subset(singleton(u),v)
    | equal(skf3(v,singleton(u)),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[4,27]),
    [iquote('0:Res:4.1,27.0')] ).

cnf(33,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | subset(singleton(u),v)
    | subset(w,v) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,6]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:29.1,6.0')] ).

cnf(34,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | subset(singleton(u),v) ),
    inference(con,[status(thm)],[33]),
    [iquote('0:Con:33.2')] ).

cnf(37,plain,
    ~ in(skc2,skc3),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[34,13]),
    [iquote('1:Res:34.1,13.0')] ).

cnf(38,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[37,12]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:37.0,12.0')] ).

cnf(39,plain,
    ~ in(skc2,skc3),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(sa)])],[38,12]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:38.0,2.0,12.0')] ).

cnf(40,plain,
    subset(singleton(skc2),skc3),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[2]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:38.0,2.1')] ).

cnf(55,plain,
    ( ~ equal(u,skc2)
    | in(u,skc3) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[40,22]),
    [iquote('1:Res:40.0,22.1')] ).

cnf(61,plain,
    ~ equal(skc2,skc2),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[55,39]),
    [iquote('1:Res:55.1,39.0')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    $false,
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[61]),
    [iquote('1:Obv:61.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : SEU144+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 06:30:48 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.43  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS derived 42 clauses, backtracked 3 clauses, performed 1 splits and kept 46 clauses.
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS allocated 85251 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.43  SPASS spent	0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.43  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  
% 0.18/0.43  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 22 :
% 0.18/0.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.43  Formulae used in the proof : l2_zfmisc_1 d3_tarski d1_tarski
% 0.18/0.43  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------