TSTP Solution File: SEU141+2 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : SEU141+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 03:04:39 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 4.04s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_union2(X0,X1) = set_union2(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
    <=> set_intersection2(X0,X1) = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( proper_subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ( X0 != X1
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_xboole_0) ).

fof(f27,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
     => disjoint(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_r1_xboole_0) ).

fof(f35,axiom,
    ! [X0] : empty_set = set_intersection2(X0,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_boole) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(set_difference(X0,X1),X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t36_xboole_1) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set = set_difference(X0,X1)
    <=> subset(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t37_xboole_1) ).

fof(f41,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_union2(X0,X1) = set_union2(X0,set_difference(X1,X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t39_xboole_1) ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    ! [X0] : set_difference(X0,empty_set) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t3_boole) ).

fof(f45,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_difference(X0,X1) = set_difference(set_union2(X0,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t40_xboole_1) ).

fof(f47,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_difference(X0,set_difference(X0,X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t48_xboole_1) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ~ ( proper_subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t60_xboole_1) ).

fof(f55,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
    <=> set_difference(X0,X1) = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t83_xboole_1) ).

fof(f56,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( disjoint(X0,X1)
      <=> set_difference(X0,X1) = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( X0 != X1
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => proper_subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f12]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( proper_subset(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( proper_subset(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X0)
      | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ proper_subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
    <~> set_difference(X0,X1) = X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( disjoint(X0,X1)
        | set_intersection2(X0,X1) != empty_set )
      & ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) = empty_set
        | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f130,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( empty_set = set_difference(X0,X1)
        | ~ subset(X0,X1) )
      & ( subset(X0,X1)
        | empty_set != set_difference(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ( set_difference(X0,X1) != X0
        | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) )
      & ( set_difference(X0,X1) = X0
        | disjoint(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1] :
        ( ( set_difference(X0,X1) != X0
          | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) )
        & ( set_difference(X0,X1) = X0
          | disjoint(X0,X1) ) )
   => ( ( sK10 != set_difference(sK10,sK11)
        | ~ disjoint(sK10,sK11) )
      & ( sK10 = set_difference(sK10,sK11)
        | disjoint(sK10,sK11) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

fof(f137,plain,
    ( ( sK10 != set_difference(sK10,sK11)
      | ~ disjoint(sK10,sK11) )
    & ( sK10 = set_difference(sK10,sK11)
      | disjoint(sK10,sK11) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK10,sK11])],[f135,f136]) ).

fof(f140,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_union2(X0,X1) = set_union2(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f168,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( set_intersection2(X0,X1) = empty_set
      | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

fof(f169,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
      | set_intersection2(X0,X1) != empty_set ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f121]) ).

fof(f170,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( proper_subset(X0,X1)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f70]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X1,X0)
      | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ! [X0] : empty_set = set_intersection2(X0,empty_set),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).

fof(f195,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : subset(set_difference(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f196,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | empty_set != set_difference(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f130]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_union2(X0,X1) = set_union2(X0,set_difference(X1,X0)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ! [X0] : set_difference(X0,empty_set) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f204,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_difference(X0,X1) = set_difference(set_union2(X0,X1),X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f206,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : set_intersection2(X0,X1) = set_difference(X0,set_difference(X0,X1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f210,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ proper_subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    ( sK10 = set_difference(sK10,sK11)
    | disjoint(sK10,sK11) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f216,plain,
    ( sK10 != set_difference(sK10,sK11)
    | ~ disjoint(sK10,sK11) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f137]) ).

fof(f226,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( disjoint(X0,X1)
      | empty_set != set_difference(X0,set_difference(X0,X1)) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f169,f206]) ).

fof(f227,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( empty_set = set_difference(X0,set_difference(X0,X1))
      | ~ disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f168,f206]) ).

fof(f233,plain,
    ! [X0] : empty_set = set_difference(X0,set_difference(X0,empty_set)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f190,f206]) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    set_union2(X0,X1) = set_union2(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f140]) ).

cnf(c_79,plain,
    ( set_difference(X0,set_difference(X0,X1)) != empty_set
    | disjoint(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f226]) ).

cnf(c_80,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(X0,X1)
    | set_difference(X0,set_difference(X0,X1)) = empty_set ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f227]) ).

cnf(c_81,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
    | X0 = X1
    | proper_subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f170]) ).

cnf(c_93,plain,
    ( ~ disjoint(X0,X1)
    | disjoint(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f182]) ).

cnf(c_101,plain,
    set_difference(X0,set_difference(X0,empty_set)) = empty_set,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f233]) ).

cnf(c_106,plain,
    subset(set_difference(X0,X1),X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f195]) ).

cnf(c_108,plain,
    ( set_difference(X0,X1) != empty_set
    | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f196]) ).

cnf(c_109,plain,
    set_union2(X0,set_difference(X1,X0)) = set_union2(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f198]) ).

cnf(c_110,plain,
    set_difference(X0,empty_set) = X0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f199]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    set_difference(set_union2(X0,X1),X1) = set_difference(X0,X1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f204]) ).

cnf(c_120,plain,
    ( ~ proper_subset(X0,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f210]) ).

cnf(c_125,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(sK10,sK11) != sK10
    | ~ disjoint(sK10,sK11) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f216]) ).

cnf(c_126,negated_conjecture,
    ( set_difference(sK10,sK11) = sK10
    | disjoint(sK10,sK11) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f215]) ).

cnf(c_733,plain,
    set_difference(X0,X0) = empty_set,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_101,c_110]) ).

cnf(c_1774,plain,
    set_difference(sK10,sK11) = sP0_iProver_def,
    definition ).

cnf(c_1775,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0_iProver_def = sK10
    | disjoint(sK10,sK11) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_126,c_1774]) ).

cnf(c_1776,negated_conjecture,
    ( sP0_iProver_def != sK10
    | ~ disjoint(sK10,sK11) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_125]) ).

cnf(c_2979,plain,
    subset(sP0_iProver_def,sK10),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1774,c_106]) ).

cnf(c_2996,plain,
    ( sK10 = sP0_iProver_def
    | disjoint(sK11,sK10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1775,c_93]) ).

cnf(c_3003,plain,
    ( sK10 = sP0_iProver_def
    | disjoint(sK10,sK11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2996,c_93]) ).

cnf(c_3132,plain,
    set_union2(sK11,sK10) = set_union2(sK11,sP0_iProver_def),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1774,c_109]) ).

cnf(c_3234,plain,
    set_union2(sK10,sK11) = set_union2(sP0_iProver_def,sK11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3132,c_51]) ).

cnf(c_3637,plain,
    set_difference(set_union2(sP0_iProver_def,sK11),sK11) = set_difference(sK10,sK11),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3234,c_115]) ).

cnf(c_3658,plain,
    set_difference(set_union2(sP0_iProver_def,sK11),sK11) = sP0_iProver_def,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_3637,c_1774]) ).

cnf(c_3952,plain,
    ( sK10 = sP0_iProver_def
    | proper_subset(sP0_iProver_def,sK10) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2979,c_81]) ).

cnf(c_4165,plain,
    ( set_difference(sK10,sP0_iProver_def) != empty_set
    | subset(sK10,sP0_iProver_def) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_108]) ).

cnf(c_4256,plain,
    ( ~ subset(sK10,sP0_iProver_def)
    | sK10 = sP0_iProver_def ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3952,c_120]) ).

cnf(c_4817,plain,
    set_difference(sP0_iProver_def,sK11) = sP0_iProver_def,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3658,c_115]) ).

cnf(c_4818,plain,
    ( set_difference(sP0_iProver_def,sP0_iProver_def) != empty_set
    | disjoint(sP0_iProver_def,sK11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4817,c_79]) ).

cnf(c_4842,plain,
    disjoint(sP0_iProver_def,sK11),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4818,c_733]) ).

cnf(c_5035,plain,
    ( set_difference(sK10,set_difference(sK10,sK11)) = empty_set
    | sK10 = sP0_iProver_def ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3003,c_80]) ).

cnf(c_5051,plain,
    ( set_difference(sK10,sP0_iProver_def) = empty_set
    | sK10 = sP0_iProver_def ),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_5035,c_1774]) ).

cnf(c_5328,plain,
    sK10 = sP0_iProver_def,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_4256,c_4165,c_4256,c_5051]) ).

cnf(c_5353,plain,
    ( sP0_iProver_def != sP0_iProver_def
    | ~ disjoint(sP0_iProver_def,sK11) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1776,c_5328]) ).

cnf(c_5365,plain,
    ~ disjoint(sP0_iProver_def,sK11),
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_5353]) ).

cnf(c_5366,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5365,c_4842]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : SEU141+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu May  2 17:53:07 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 4.04/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.04/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------  iProver source info
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 4.04/1.19  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 4.04/1.19  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Parsing...
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 3  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  clauses                                 73
% 4.04/1.19  conjectures                             2
% 4.04/1.19  EPR                                     23
% 4.04/1.19  Horn                                    57
% 4.04/1.19  unary                                   19
% 4.04/1.19  binary                                  31
% 4.04/1.19  lits                                    153
% 4.04/1.19  lits eq                                 35
% 4.04/1.19  fd_pure                                 0
% 4.04/1.19  fd_pseudo                               0
% 4.04/1.19  fd_cond                                 3
% 4.04/1.19  fd_pseudo_cond                          14
% 4.04/1.19  AC symbols                              0
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------ 
% 4.04/1.19  Current options:
% 4.04/1.19  ------ 
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  ------ Proving...
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.04/1.19  
% 4.04/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------