TSTP Solution File: SEU133+2 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : SEU133+2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Dec 26 04:45:38 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 3.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 13
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 139 ( 17 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 175 ( 64 ~; 68 |; 37 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 74 ( 3 sgn 50 !; 8 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] : subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
file('/tmp/tmpFP32m1/sel_SEU133+2.p_1',t36_xboole_1) ).
fof(25,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
& ~ in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpFP32m1/sel_SEU133+2.p_1',d4_xboole_0) ).
fof(44,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> in(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/tmp/tmpFP32m1/sel_SEU133+2.p_1',d3_tarski) ).
fof(47,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] : subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
fof(52,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_difference(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
& ~ in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[25,theory(equality)]) ).
fof(56,negated_conjecture,
? [X1,X2] : ~ subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[47]) ).
fof(57,negated_conjecture,
? [X3,X4] : ~ subset(set_difference(X3,X4),X3),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[56]) ).
fof(58,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(set_difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[57]) ).
cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(set_difference(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[58]) ).
fof(135,plain,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( X3 != set_difference(X1,X2)
| ! [X4] :
( ( ~ in(X4,X3)
| ( in(X4,X1)
& ~ in(X4,X2) ) )
& ( ~ in(X4,X1)
| in(X4,X2)
| in(X4,X3) ) ) )
& ( ? [X4] :
( ( ~ in(X4,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X1)
| in(X4,X2) )
& ( in(X4,X3)
| ( in(X4,X1)
& ~ in(X4,X2) ) ) )
| X3 = set_difference(X1,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[52]) ).
fof(136,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ( X7 != set_difference(X5,X6)
| ! [X8] :
( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
| ( in(X8,X5)
& ~ in(X8,X6) ) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7) ) ) )
& ( ? [X9] :
( ( ~ in(X9,X7)
| ~ in(X9,X5)
| in(X9,X6) )
& ( in(X9,X7)
| ( in(X9,X5)
& ~ in(X9,X6) ) ) )
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[135]) ).
fof(137,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7] :
( ( X7 != set_difference(X5,X6)
| ! [X8] :
( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
| ( in(X8,X5)
& ~ in(X8,X6) ) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7) ) ) )
& ( ( ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6) )
& ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
& ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6) ) ) )
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[136]) ).
fof(138,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( ( ( ~ in(X8,X7)
| ( in(X8,X5)
& ~ in(X8,X6) ) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7) ) )
| X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ( ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6) )
& ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
& ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6) ) ) )
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[137]) ).
fof(139,plain,
! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
( ( in(X8,X5)
| ~ in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X6)
| ~ in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(X8,X5)
| in(X8,X6)
| in(X8,X7)
| X7 != set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
| in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) )
& ( ~ in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X6)
| in(esk7_3(X5,X6,X7),X7)
| X7 = set_difference(X5,X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[138]) ).
cnf(145,plain,
( in(X4,X2)
| X1 != set_difference(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[139]) ).
fof(205,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ! [X3] :
( ~ in(X3,X1)
| in(X3,X2) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
& ~ in(X3,X2) )
| subset(X1,X2) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[44]) ).
fof(206,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ! [X6] :
( ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5) ) )
& ( ? [X7] :
( in(X7,X4)
& ~ in(X7,X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[205]) ).
fof(207,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
| ! [X6] :
( ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5) ) )
& ( ( in(esk11_2(X4,X5),X4)
& ~ in(esk11_2(X4,X5),X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[206]) ).
fof(208,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5)
| ~ subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ( in(esk11_2(X4,X5),X4)
& ~ in(esk11_2(X4,X5),X5) )
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[207]) ).
fof(209,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ in(X6,X4)
| in(X6,X5)
| ~ subset(X4,X5) )
& ( in(esk11_2(X4,X5),X4)
| subset(X4,X5) )
& ( ~ in(esk11_2(X4,X5),X5)
| subset(X4,X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[208]) ).
cnf(210,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[209]) ).
cnf(211,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk11_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[209]) ).
cnf(366,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,set_difference(X2,X3)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[145,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(2695,plain,
( in(esk11_2(set_difference(X1,X2),X3),X1)
| subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[366,211,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(83253,plain,
subset(set_difference(X1,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[210,2695,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(83898,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[59,83253,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(83899,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[83898,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(83900,negated_conjecture,
$false,
83899,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU133+2.p
% --creating new selector for []
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpFP32m1/sel_SEU133+2.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem SEU133+2.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU133+2.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/SEU/SEU133+2.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------