TSTP Solution File: SEU129+2 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SEU129+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:22:36 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 23
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 42 ( 13 unt; 18 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 13 ~; 10 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 24 ( 12 >; 12 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 3 sgn; 26 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
set_union2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
set_intersection2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_26,type,
empty_set: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
disjoint: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_28,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk1_1: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
esk2_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
esk3_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
esk4_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
esk5_0: $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
esk6_0: $i ).
tff(decl_35,type,
esk7_0: $i ).
tff(decl_36,type,
esk8_0: $i ).
tff(decl_37,type,
esk9_0: $i ).
tff(decl_38,type,
esk10_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_39,type,
esk11_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
fof(t26_xboole_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( subset(X1,X2)
=> subset(set_intersection2(X1,X3),set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t26_xboole_1) ).
fof(t1_xboole_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X2,X3) )
=> subset(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1_xboole_1) ).
fof(t17_xboole_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2] : subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_xboole_1) ).
fof(t19_xboole_1,lemma,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( subset(X1,X2)
& subset(X1,X3) )
=> subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_xboole_1) ).
fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
( subset(X1,X2)
=> subset(set_intersection2(X1,X3),set_intersection2(X2,X3)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t26_xboole_1]) ).
fof(c_0_6,lemma,
! [X62,X63,X64] :
( ~ subset(X62,X63)
| ~ subset(X63,X64)
| subset(X62,X64) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t1_xboole_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( subset(esk7_0,esk8_0)
& ~ subset(set_intersection2(esk7_0,esk9_0),set_intersection2(esk8_0,esk9_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,lemma,
( subset(X1,X3)
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X2,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk7_0,esk8_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,lemma,
! [X56,X57] : subset(set_intersection2(X56,X57),X56),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t17_xboole_1]) ).
fof(c_0_11,lemma,
! [X58,X59,X60] :
( ~ subset(X58,X59)
| ~ subset(X58,X60)
| subset(X58,set_intersection2(X59,X60)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t19_xboole_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( subset(X1,esk8_0)
| ~ subset(X1,esk7_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,lemma,
subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X9,X10] : set_intersection2(X9,X10) = set_intersection2(X10,X9),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,lemma,
( subset(X1,set_intersection2(X2,X3))
| ~ subset(X1,X2)
| ~ subset(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,lemma,
subset(set_intersection2(esk7_0,X1),esk8_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,lemma,
( subset(set_intersection2(esk7_0,X1),set_intersection2(X2,esk8_0))
| ~ subset(set_intersection2(esk7_0,X1),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,lemma,
subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,lemma,
subset(set_intersection2(esk7_0,X1),set_intersection2(X1,esk8_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(set_intersection2(esk7_0,esk9_0),set_intersection2(esk8_0,esk9_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,lemma,
subset(set_intersection2(esk7_0,X1),set_intersection2(esk8_0,X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU129+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 18:47:16 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.60 % Total time : 0.027000 s
% 0.19/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.60 % Total time : 0.030000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------