TSTP Solution File: SEU127+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SEU127+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 16:22:35 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.59s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 10 unt; 11 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 55 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 20 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 56 ( 20 ~; 24 |; 8 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 12 ( 6 >; 6 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 4 sgn; 28 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_23,type,
set_intersection2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_24,type,
subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
empty_set: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_27,type,
esk1_2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk2_3: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
tff(decl_31,type,
esk5_0: $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
esk6_0: $i ).
fof(d3_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( X3 = set_intersection2(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X4] :
( in(X4,X3)
<=> ( in(X4,X1)
& in(X4,X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).
fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( subset(X1,X2)
<=> ! [X3] :
( in(X3,X1)
=> in(X3,X2) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).
fof(t17_xboole_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] : subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_xboole_1) ).
fof(commutativity_k3_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k3_xboole_0) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X15,X16,X17,X18,X19,X20,X21,X22] :
( ( in(X18,X15)
| ~ in(X18,X17)
| X17 != set_intersection2(X15,X16) )
& ( in(X18,X16)
| ~ in(X18,X17)
| X17 != set_intersection2(X15,X16) )
& ( ~ in(X19,X15)
| ~ in(X19,X16)
| in(X19,X17)
| X17 != set_intersection2(X15,X16) )
& ( ~ in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X22)
| ~ in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X20)
| ~ in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X21)
| X22 = set_intersection2(X20,X21) )
& ( in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X20)
| in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X22)
| X22 = set_intersection2(X20,X21) )
& ( in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X21)
| in(esk2_3(X20,X21,X22),X22)
| X22 = set_intersection2(X20,X21) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_xboole_0])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,X3)
| X3 != set_intersection2(X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
( ( ~ subset(X9,X10)
| ~ in(X11,X9)
| in(X11,X10) )
& ( in(esk1_2(X12,X13),X12)
| subset(X12,X13) )
& ( ~ in(esk1_2(X12,X13),X13)
| subset(X12,X13) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| ~ in(X1,set_intersection2(X3,X2)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
| subset(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] : subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t17_xboole_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X3)
| in(esk1_2(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X7,X8] : set_intersection2(X7,X8) = set_intersection2(X8,X7),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k3_xboole_0]) ).
fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk5_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
set_intersection2(X1,X2) = set_intersection2(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(set_intersection2(esk5_0,esk6_0),esk5_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
subset(set_intersection2(X1,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU127+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 15:49:51 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.57 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.59 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.20/0.59 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.59 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.59 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.59 % Total time : 0.011000 s
% 0.20/0.59 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.59 % Total time : 0.013000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------