TSTP Solution File: SEU127+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU127+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.90s 1.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (   4 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   19 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   4   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   15 (   7   >;   8   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (;  21   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > empty > set_intersection2 > #nlpp > empty_set > #skF_7 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_4 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff(set_intersection2,type,
    set_intersection2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_40,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( subset(A,B)
    <=> ! [C] :
          ( in(C,A)
         => in(C,B) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

tff(f_49,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( C = set_intersection2(A,B) )
    <=> ! [D] :
          ( in(D,C)
        <=> ( in(D,A)
            & in(D,B) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_63,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] : subset(set_intersection2(A,B),A),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t17_xboole_1) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [A_5,B_6] :
      ( in('#skF_1'(A_5,B_6),A_5)
      | subset(A_5,B_6) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_40]) ).

tff(c_259,plain,
    ! [D_50,A_51,B_52] :
      ( in(D_50,A_51)
      | ~ in(D_50,set_intersection2(A_51,B_52)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_757,plain,
    ! [A_112,B_113,B_114] :
      ( in('#skF_1'(set_intersection2(A_112,B_113),B_114),A_112)
      | subset(set_intersection2(A_112,B_113),B_114) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_259]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [A_5,B_6] :
      ( ~ in('#skF_1'(A_5,B_6),B_6)
      | subset(A_5,B_6) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_40]) ).

tff(c_806,plain,
    ! [A_112,B_113] : subset(set_intersection2(A_112,B_113),A_112),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_757,c_8]) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ~ subset(set_intersection2('#skF_6','#skF_7'),'#skF_6'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_63]) ).

tff(c_818,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_806,c_44]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SEU127+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:06:38 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.90/1.90  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.90/1.90  
% 3.90/1.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.07/1.93  
% 4.07/1.93  Inference rules
% 4.07/1.93  ----------------------
% 4.07/1.93  #Ref     : 0
% 4.07/1.93  #Sup     : 176
% 4.07/1.93  #Fact    : 0
% 4.07/1.93  #Define  : 0
% 4.07/1.93  #Split   : 0
% 4.07/1.93  #Chain   : 0
% 4.07/1.93  #Close   : 0
% 4.07/1.93  
% 4.07/1.93  Ordering : KBO
% 4.07/1.93  
% 4.07/1.93  Simplification rules
% 4.07/1.93  ----------------------
% 4.07/1.93  #Subsume      : 32
% 4.07/1.93  #Demod        : 46
% 4.07/1.93  #Tautology    : 65
% 4.07/1.93  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.07/1.93  #BackRed      : 4
% 4.07/1.93  
% 4.07/1.93  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.07/1.93  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.07/1.93  
% 4.07/1.93  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.07/1.93  ----------------------
% 4.07/1.93  Preprocessing        : 0.49
% 4.07/1.93  Parsing              : 0.26
% 4.07/1.93  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 4.07/1.93  Main loop            : 0.46
% 4.07/1.93  Inferencing          : 0.17
% 4.07/1.93  Reduction            : 0.14
% 4.07/1.93  Demodulation         : 0.11
% 4.07/1.93  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 4.07/1.93  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 4.07/1.93  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.07/1.93  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.07/1.93  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.07/1.93  Total                : 1.00
% 4.07/1.93  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.07/1.93  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.07/1.93  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.07/1.93  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------