TSTP Solution File: SEU120+2 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SEU120+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xhscvjBPNc true
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:10:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.73s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 6 unt; 8 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 8 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 103 ( 17 ~; 7 |; 6 &; 71 @)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 7 ( 7 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 10 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 ^; 19 !; 2 ?; 21 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__7_type,type,
sk__7: $i ).
thf(set_intersection2_type,type,
set_intersection2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__6_type,type,
sk__6: $i ).
thf(sk__5_type,type,
sk__5: $i ).
thf(empty_set_type,type,
empty_set: $i ).
thf(in_type,type,
in: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(disjoint_type,type,
disjoint: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i > $i ).
thf(t4_xboole_0,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( ? [C: $i] : ( in @ C @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) )
& ( disjoint @ A @ B ) )
& ~ ( ~ ( disjoint @ A @ B )
& ! [C: $i] :
~ ( in @ C @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ~ ( ? [C: $i] : ( in @ C @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) )
& ( disjoint @ A @ B ) )
& ~ ( ~ ( disjoint @ A @ B )
& ! [C: $i] :
~ ( in @ C @ ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B ) ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[t4_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl22,plain,
( ( in @ sk__7 @ ( set_intersection2 @ sk__5 @ sk__6 ) )
| ~ ( disjoint @ sk__5 @ sk__6 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(d1_xboole_0,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A = empty_set )
<=> ! [B: $i] :
~ ( in @ B @ A ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = empty_set )
| ( in @ ( sk_ @ X0 ) @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl25,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ sk__5 @ sk__6 )
| ~ ( in @ X0 @ ( set_intersection2 @ sk__5 @ sk__6 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl162,plain,
( ( ( set_intersection2 @ sk__5 @ sk__6 )
= empty_set )
| ( disjoint @ sk__5 @ sk__6 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl25]) ).
thf(d7_xboole_0,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ A @ B )
<=> ( ( set_intersection2 @ A @ B )
= empty_set ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl11,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( disjoint @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ X1 )
!= empty_set ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d7_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl168,plain,
disjoint @ sk__5 @ sk__6,
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl162,zip_derived_cl11]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl169,plain,
in @ sk__7 @ ( set_intersection2 @ sk__5 @ sk__6 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl22,zip_derived_cl168]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl168_001,plain,
disjoint @ sk__5 @ sk__6,
inference(clc,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl162,zip_derived_cl11]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( ( set_intersection2 @ X0 @ X1 )
= empty_set )
| ~ ( disjoint @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d7_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl170,plain,
( ( set_intersection2 @ sk__5 @ sk__6 )
= empty_set ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl168,zip_derived_cl10]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( in @ X0 @ X1 )
| ( X1 != empty_set ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[d1_xboole_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl119,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
~ ( in @ X0 @ empty_set ),
inference(eq_res,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl251,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl169,zip_derived_cl170,zip_derived_cl119]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU120+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.3.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.xhscvjBPNc true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 16:41:19 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.68 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.73 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.20/0.73 % BCE start: 26
% 0.20/0.73 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.20/0.73 % PE start: 26
% 0.20/0.73 logic: eq
% 0.20/0.73 % PE eliminated: 1
% 0.20/0.73 % done 45 iterations in 0.029s
% 0.20/0.73 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.20/0.73 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.73
% 0.20/0.73
% 0.20/0.73 % Terminating...
% 1.38/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.38/0.85 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------