TSTP Solution File: SEU116+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU116+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:53 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t30_finsub_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2] :
( element(X2,finite_subsets(X1))
=> finite(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t30_finsub_1) ).
fof(cc3_finsub_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( element(X2,finite_subsets(X1))
=> finite(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cc3_finsub_1) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2] :
( element(X2,finite_subsets(X1))
=> finite(X2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t30_finsub_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ element(X4,finite_subsets(X3))
| finite(X4) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc3_finsub_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( element(esk2_0,finite_subsets(esk1_0))
& ~ finite(esk2_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( finite(X1)
| ~ element(X1,finite_subsets(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
element(esk2_0,finite_subsets(esk1_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ finite(esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SEU116+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 11:45:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 6
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.23/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 31
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 12
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses : 34
% 0.23/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 0.23/1.42 # Processed clauses : 14
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 14
% 0.23/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.23/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23
% 0.23/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 39
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.23/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1383
% 0.23/1.42
% 0.23/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.42 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 2716 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------