TSTP Solution File: SEU115+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SEU115+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  11   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn   6   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t28_finsub_1,conjecture,
    finite_subsets(empty_set) = singleton(empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t28_finsub_1) ).

fof(t6_boole,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
     => X1 = empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t6_boole) ).

fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
    ? [X1] : empty(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',rc1_xboole_0) ).

fof(t1_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    powerset(empty_set) = singleton(empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t1_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t27_finsub_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( finite(X1)
     => finite_subsets(X1) = powerset(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t27_finsub_1) ).

fof(cc1_finset_1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( empty(X1)
     => finite(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',cc1_finset_1) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    finite_subsets(empty_set) != singleton(empty_set),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t28_finsub_1]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ empty(X2)
      | X2 = empty_set ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t6_boole])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    empty(esk4_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[rc1_xboole_0])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    finite_subsets(empty_set) != singleton(empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( X1 = empty_set
    | ~ empty(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    empty(esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    finite_subsets(empty_set) != singleton(empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    powerset(empty_set) = singleton(empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[t1_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    empty_set = esk4_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ finite(X2)
      | finite_subsets(X2) = powerset(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t27_finsub_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    finite_subsets(esk4_0) != powerset(esk4_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( finite_subsets(X1) = powerset(X1)
    | ~ finite(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ empty(X2)
      | finite(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[cc1_finset_1])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ finite(esk4_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( finite(X1)
    | ~ empty(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU115+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 08:42:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 10
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 12
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 35
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 40
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 40
% 0.24/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 44
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 40
% 0.24/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 23
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 21
% 0.24/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 23
% 0.24/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 36
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.24/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.24/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 30
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.24/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1795
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Total time               : 0.018 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3000 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------