TSTP Solution File: SEU096+1 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SEU096+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 01:01:32 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 1.07s
% Output : Solution 1.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16429/SEU096+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16429/SEU096+1.tptp
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16429/SEU096+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=60 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 60s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 120s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 16525
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.00 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(6, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:(((relation(X1)&function(X1))&finite(X2))=>finite(relation_image(X1,X2))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', fc13_finset_1)).
% fof(8, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))=>(subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))=>relation_image(X2,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))=X1)),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t147_funct_1)).
% fof(60, conjecture,![X1]:![X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))=>((subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))&finite(relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)))=>finite(X1))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t27_finset_1)).
% fof(61, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:![X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))=>((subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))&finite(relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)))=>finite(X1)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[60])).
% fof(93, plain,![X1]:![X2]:(((~(relation(X1))|~(function(X1)))|~(finite(X2)))|finite(relation_image(X1,X2))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[6])).
% fof(94, plain,![X3]:![X4]:(((~(relation(X3))|~(function(X3)))|~(finite(X4)))|finite(relation_image(X3,X4))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[93])).
% cnf(95,plain,(finite(relation_image(X1,X2))|~finite(X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[94])).
% fof(99, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(relation(X2))|~(function(X2)))|(~(subset(X1,relation_rng(X2)))|relation_image(X2,relation_inverse_image(X2,X1))=X1)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[8])).
% fof(100, plain,![X3]:![X4]:((~(relation(X4))|~(function(X4)))|(~(subset(X3,relation_rng(X4)))|relation_image(X4,relation_inverse_image(X4,X3))=X3)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[99])).
% cnf(101,plain,(relation_image(X1,relation_inverse_image(X1,X2))=X2|~subset(X2,relation_rng(X1))|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[100])).
% fof(337, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:?[X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))&((subset(X1,relation_rng(X2))&finite(relation_inverse_image(X2,X1)))&~(finite(X1)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[61])).
% fof(338, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:?[X4]:((relation(X4)&function(X4))&((subset(X3,relation_rng(X4))&finite(relation_inverse_image(X4,X3)))&~(finite(X3)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[337])).
% fof(339, negated_conjecture,((relation(esk28_0)&function(esk28_0))&((subset(esk27_0,relation_rng(esk28_0))&finite(relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0)))&~(finite(esk27_0)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[338])).
% cnf(340,negated_conjecture,(~finite(esk27_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[339])).
% cnf(341,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[339])).
% cnf(342,negated_conjecture,(subset(esk27_0,relation_rng(esk28_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[339])).
% cnf(343,negated_conjecture,(function(esk28_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[339])).
% cnf(344,negated_conjecture,(relation(esk28_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[339])).
% cnf(636,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_image(esk28_0,X1))|~finite(X1)|~relation(esk28_0)),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[95,343,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(648,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_image(esk28_0,X1))|~finite(X1)|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[636,344,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(649,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_image(esk28_0,X1))|~finite(X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[648,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(677,negated_conjecture,(relation_image(esk28_0,relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0))=esk27_0|~function(esk28_0)|~relation(esk28_0)),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[101,342,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(679,negated_conjecture,(relation_image(esk28_0,relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0))=esk27_0|$false|~relation(esk28_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[677,343,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(680,negated_conjecture,(relation_image(esk28_0,relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0))=esk27_0|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[679,344,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(681,negated_conjecture,(relation_image(esk28_0,relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0))=esk27_0),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[680,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(987,negated_conjecture,(finite(relation_image(esk28_0,relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0)))),inference(pm,[status(thm)],[649,341,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2179,negated_conjecture,(finite(esk27_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[987,681,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2180,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(sr,[status(thm)],[2179,340,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(2181,negated_conjecture,($false),2180,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 448
% # ...of these trivial : 37
% # ...subsumed : 27
% # ...remaining for further processing: 384
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 0
% # Backward-rewritten : 50
% # Generated clauses : 1435
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1321
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% # Paramodulations : 1426
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 0
% # Current number of processed clauses: 333
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 220
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 18
% # Non-unit-clauses : 95
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 917
% # ...number of literals in the above : 1057
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 178
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 177
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 100
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 317
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 14
% # Backwards rewriting index: 410 leaves, 1.23+/-1.176 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 163 leaves, 1.41+/-1.708 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 349 leaves, 1.25+/-1.241 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 0.052 s
% # System time : 0.006 s
% # Total time : 0.058 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 0.17 CPU 0.25 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 0.17 CPU 0.25 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP16429/SEU096+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------