TSTP Solution File: SEU096+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SEU096+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 08:38:26 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.91s 2.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 3 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_134,plain,
( relation_image(X1,relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)) = X2
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ subset(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w2maa2c0/lgb.p',i_0_134) ).
cnf(i_0_139,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk27_0,relation_rng(esk28_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w2maa2c0/lgb.p',i_0_139) ).
cnf(i_0_141,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk28_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w2maa2c0/lgb.p',i_0_141) ).
cnf(i_0_140,negated_conjecture,
function(esk28_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w2maa2c0/lgb.p',i_0_140) ).
cnf(i_0_30,plain,
( finite(relation_image(X1,X2))
| ~ finite(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w2maa2c0/lgb.p',i_0_30) ).
cnf(i_0_138,negated_conjecture,
finite(relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w2maa2c0/lgb.p',i_0_138) ).
cnf(i_0_137,negated_conjecture,
~ finite(esk27_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-w2maa2c0/lgb.p',i_0_137) ).
cnf(c_0_149,plain,
( relation_image(X1,relation_inverse_image(X1,X2)) = X2
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ subset(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
i_0_134 ).
cnf(c_0_150,negated_conjecture,
subset(esk27_0,relation_rng(esk28_0)),
i_0_139 ).
cnf(c_0_151,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk28_0),
i_0_141 ).
cnf(c_0_152,negated_conjecture,
function(esk28_0),
i_0_140 ).
cnf(c_0_153,plain,
( finite(relation_image(X1,X2))
| ~ finite(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
i_0_30 ).
cnf(c_0_154,negated_conjecture,
relation_image(esk28_0,relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0)) = esk27_0,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_149,c_0_150]),c_0_151]),c_0_152])]) ).
cnf(c_0_155,negated_conjecture,
finite(relation_inverse_image(esk28_0,esk27_0)),
i_0_138 ).
cnf(c_0_156,negated_conjecture,
~ finite(esk27_0),
i_0_137 ).
cnf(c_0_157,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_153,c_0_154]),c_0_151]),c_0_152]),c_0_155])]),c_0_156]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : SEU096+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 19:11:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 6.91/2.17 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.91/2.17 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.91/2.17 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.91/2.17 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2q
% 6.91/2.17 # and selection function SelectCQArNTNp.
% 6.91/2.17 #
% 6.91/2.17 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 6.91/2.17 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.91/2.17
% 6.91/2.17 # Proof found!
% 6.91/2.17 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.91/2.17 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.91/2.17 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.91/2.17
% 6.91/2.17 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.91/2.17 # User time : 0.024 s
% 6.91/2.17 # System time : 0.006 s
% 6.91/2.17 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 6.91/2.17 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 6.91/2.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------