TSTP Solution File: SEU072+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU072+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:18:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.02s 1.20s
% Output   : Refutation 1.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  17 unt;   4 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (  15 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | Y != relation_rng(X)
    | in(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,relation_dom(X))
    | Z != apply(X,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV4'(X),relation_dom(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV5'(X),relation_dom(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | apply(X,'SKOLEMAAAV4'(X)) = apply(X,'SKOLEMAAAV5'(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV4'(X) != 'SKOLEMAAAV5'(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ in(Y,relation_dom(X))
    | relation_image(X,singleton(Y)) = singleton(apply(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t117_funct_1) ).

cnf(48,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ in(Y,relation_rng(X))
    | relation_inverse_image(X,singleton(Y)) != empty_set ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t142_funct_1) ).

cnf(50,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t153_funct_1) ).

cnf(51,negated_conjecture,
    function('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t153_funct_1) ).

cnf(52,negated_conjecture,
    subset(relation_inverse_image('SKOLEMAAAV17',relation_image('SKOLEMAAAV17',X)),X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t153_funct_1) ).

cnf(53,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t153_funct_1) ).

cnf(56,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(X,singleton(Y))
    | X = empty_set
    | X = singleton(Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t39_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(64,axiom,
    ( ~ subset(singleton(X),singleton(Y))
    | X = Y ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_zfmisc_1) ).

cnf(108,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17'),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[12,50,51,53]) ).

cnf(110,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV17'),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[13,50,51,53]) ).

cnf(112,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17') != 'SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,50,51,53]) ).

cnf(120,plain,
    apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17')) = apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[14,50,51,53]) ).

cnf(184,plain,
    in(apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17')),relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,108,50,51,theory(equality),theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(185,plain,
    relation_image('SKOLEMAAAV17',singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17'))) = singleton(apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[47,108,50,51]) ).

cnf(188,plain,
    relation_image('SKOLEMAAAV17',singleton('SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV17'))) = singleton(apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[47,110,50,51]),120,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(189,plain,
    ~ subset(singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17')),singleton('SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[64,112]) ).

cnf(499,plain,
    relation_inverse_image('SKOLEMAAAV17',singleton(apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17')))) != empty_set,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[48,184,50]) ).

cnf(1822,plain,
    subset(relation_inverse_image('SKOLEMAAAV17',singleton(apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17')))),singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[52,185,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(1826,plain,
    subset(relation_inverse_image('SKOLEMAAAV17',singleton(apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17')))),singleton('SKOLEMAAAV5'('SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[52,188,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(3344,plain,
    relation_inverse_image('SKOLEMAAAV17',singleton(apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17')))) = singleton('SKOLEMAAAV4'('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[56,1822,499]) ).

cnf(3345,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[1826,189,3344,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem  : SEU072+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 20 02:51:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  "."
% 0.21/0.48  * 
% 0.21/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-20T02:51:14
% 0.21/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n003.cluster.edu at 2022-06-20T02:51:14
% 0.21/0.50  WARNING:
% 0.21/0.50     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.02/1.20  
% 1.02/1.20  
% 1.02/1.20  #||
% 1.02/1.20  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.02/1.20  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.02/1.22  ||#
% 1.02/1.22  
% 1.02/1.22  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.02/1.22  ;      6771 formulas have been input or derived (from 1334 formulas).
% 1.02/1.22  ;      3345 (49%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.02/1.22  ;          146 ( 4%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.02/1.22  ;         3199 (96%) are still being kept.
% 1.02/1.22  ; 
% 1.02/1.22  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.007   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.003   0%   Assert                       (40 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.192  27%   Process new row              (5,617 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.274  38%   Resolution                   (2,666 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.056   8%   Paramodulation               (1,333 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (36 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (219 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.009   1%   Forward subsumption          (219 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.007   1%   Backward subsumption         (191 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (70 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.063   9%   Forward simplification       (5,533 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.038   5%   Backward simplification      (3,345 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.006   1%   Ordering                     (3,197 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.001   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.060   8%   Other
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.716        Total
% 1.02/1.22  ;     0.734        Real time
% 1.02/1.22  ; 
% 1.02/1.22  ; Term-hash-array has 4,740 terms in all.
% 1.02/1.22  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 172 entries (172 at peak, 191 added, 19 deleted).
% 1.02/1.22  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,326 nodes (1,326 at peak, 1,457 added, 131 deleted).
% 1.02/1.22  ;  Retrieved 74 possibly forward subsuming rows in 219 calls.
% 1.02/1.22  ;  Retrieved 3 possibly backward subsumed rows in 191 calls.
% 1.02/1.22  ; Path-index has 4,579 entries (4,604 at peak, 4,805 added, 226 deleted).
% 1.02/1.22  ; Path-index has 6,443 nodes (6,482 at peak, 6,679 added, 236 deleted).
% 1.02/1.22  ; Trie-index has 4,579 entries (4,604 at peak, 4,805 added, 226 deleted).
% 1.02/1.22  ; Trie-index has 15,209 nodes (15,355 at peak, 15,898 added, 689 deleted).
% 1.02/1.22  ; Retrieved 5,249 generalization terms in 16,277 calls.
% 1.02/1.22  ; Retrieved 3,288 instance terms in 3,153 calls.
% 1.02/1.22  ; Retrieved 323,757 unifiable terms in 50,769 calls.
% 1.02/1.22  ; 
% 1.02/1.22  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 14 entries:
% 1.02/1.22  ;    14 with value 0
% 1.02/1.22  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 1.02/1.22  ;     1 with value 21              1 with value 34
% 1.02/1.22  ; The agenda of rows to give has 1890 entries:
% 1.02/1.22  ;   124 with value (4 19)        153 with value (4 26)           3 with value (4 32)
% 1.02/1.22  ;   270 with value (4 20)         88 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 33)
% 1.02/1.22  ;   246 with value (4 21)         57 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 34)
% 1.02/1.22  ;   278 with value (4 22)         23 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 36)
% 1.02/1.22  ;   228 with value (4 23)          7 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 37)
% 1.02/1.22  ;   230 with value (4 24)          3 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 39)
% 1.02/1.22  ;   175 with value (4 25)
% 1.02/1.22  Evaluation took:
% 1.02/1.22    0.734 seconds of real time
% 1.02/1.22    0.67487 seconds of user run time
% 1.02/1.22    0.058976 seconds of system run time
% 1.02/1.22    [Run times include 0.059 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.02/1.22    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.02/1.22    0 page faults and
% 1.02/1.22    51,290,160 bytes consed.
% 1.02/1.22  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.02/1.22  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-20T02:51:15
% 1.02/1.22  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.02/1.22  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------