TSTP Solution File: SEU062+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEU062+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:44:38 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   44 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  20   ~;   9   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (  25   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f124,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f120,f117]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    empty_set != relation_inverse_image(sK1,singleton(sK4(sK0,relation_rng(sK1)))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f97,f56]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ in(X2,sK0)
      | empty_set != relation_inverse_image(sK1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f38,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,relation_rng(X1))
      & ! [X2] :
          ( empty_set != relation_inverse_image(X1,singleton(X2))
          | ~ in(X2,X0) )
      & relation(X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f37]) ).

fof(f37,plain,
    ? [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X0,relation_rng(X1))
      & ! [X2] :
          ( empty_set != relation_inverse_image(X1,singleton(X2))
          | ~ in(X2,X0) )
      & relation(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1] :
        ( relation(X1)
       => ( ! [X2] :
              ~ ( empty_set = relation_inverse_image(X1,singleton(X2))
                & in(X2,X0) )
         => subset(X0,relation_rng(X1)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f26,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ( ! [X2] :
            ~ ( empty_set = relation_inverse_image(X1,singleton(X2))
              & in(X2,X0) )
       => subset(X0,relation_rng(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t143_funct_1) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    in(sK4(sK0,relation_rng(sK1)),sK0),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f58,f85]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(sK4(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
          | ~ in(X2,X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X0)
         => in(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).

fof(f58,plain,
    ~ subset(sK0,relation_rng(sK1)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f120,plain,
    empty_set = relation_inverse_image(sK1,singleton(sK4(sK0,relation_rng(sK1)))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f57,f98,f70]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( in(X0,relation_rng(X1))
      | empty_set = relation_inverse_image(X1,singleton(X0))
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).

fof(f49,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( in(X0,relation_rng(X1))
      <=> empty_set != relation_inverse_image(X1,singleton(X0)) )
      | ~ relation(X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f25,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( relation(X1)
     => ( in(X0,relation_rng(X1))
      <=> empty_set != relation_inverse_image(X1,singleton(X0)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t142_funct_1) ).

fof(f98,plain,
    ~ in(sK4(sK0,relation_rng(sK1)),relation_rng(sK1)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f58,f86]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ in(sK4(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).

fof(f57,plain,
    relation(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : SEU062+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.21/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.21/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.21/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 17:29:08 EDT 2024
% 0.21/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.35  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.21/0.36  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22138)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22139)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22141)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22140)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22142)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22143)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-22136"
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.74  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)Memory used [KB]: 1054
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.56/0.74  % (22144)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.56/0.74  % (22136)Success in time 0.375 s
% 0.56/0.74  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------