TSTP Solution File: SEU056+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU056+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:33 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.33s 1.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   33
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   53 (  11 unt;  27 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  17   ~;  13   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   21 (  15   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   11 (   9 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  12 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (;  24   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > element > disjoint > relation_empty_yielding > relation > one_to_one > function > empty > set_intersection2 > relation_image > #nlpp > powerset > empty_set > #skF_4 > #skF_11 > #skF_1 > #skF_8 > #skF_7 > #skF_10 > #skF_14 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_13 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_9 > #skF_12

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(relation,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(element,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(one_to_one,type,
    one_to_one: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i > $i ).

tff(function,type,
    function: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(relation_empty_yielding,type,
    relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': $i ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff(set_intersection2,type,
    set_intersection2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(relation_image,type,
    relation_image: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(disjoint,type,
    disjoint: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(powerset,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i ).

tff(f_153,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] :
        ( ( relation(C)
          & function(C) )
       => ( ( disjoint(A,B)
            & one_to_one(C) )
         => disjoint(relation_image(C,A),relation_image(C,B)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t125_funct_1) ).

tff(f_88,axiom,
    ? [A] :
      ( empty(A)
      & relation(A) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rc1_relat_1) ).

tff(f_190,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( empty(A)
     => ( A = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t6_boole) ).

tff(f_157,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( relation(A)
     => ( relation_image(A,empty_set) = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t149_relat_1) ).

tff(f_57,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( disjoint(A,B)
    <=> ( set_intersection2(A,B) = empty_set ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d7_xboole_0) ).

tff(f_142,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ( relation(C)
        & function(C) )
     => ( one_to_one(C)
       => ( relation_image(C,set_intersection2(A,B)) = set_intersection2(relation_image(C,A),relation_image(C,B)) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t121_funct_1) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    relation('#skF_14'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_92,plain,
    function('#skF_14'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_88,plain,
    one_to_one('#skF_14'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_46,plain,
    empty('#skF_3'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_88]) ).

tff(c_124,plain,
    ! [A_51] :
      ( ( empty_set = A_51 )
      | ~ empty(A_51) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_190]) ).

tff(c_144,plain,
    empty_set = '#skF_3',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_124]) ).

tff(c_96,plain,
    ! [A_28] :
      ( ( relation_image(A_28,empty_set) = empty_set )
      | ~ relation(A_28) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_157]) ).

tff(c_230,plain,
    ! [A_64] :
      ( ( relation_image(A_64,'#skF_3') = '#skF_3' )
      | ~ relation(A_64) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_144,c_144,c_96]) ).

tff(c_258,plain,
    relation_image('#skF_14','#skF_3') = '#skF_3',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_230]) ).

tff(c_90,plain,
    disjoint('#skF_12','#skF_13'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_9] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(A_8,B_9) = empty_set )
      | ~ disjoint(A_8,B_9) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_422,plain,
    ! [A_83,B_84] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(A_83,B_84) = '#skF_3' )
      | ~ disjoint(A_83,B_84) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_144,c_16]) ).

tff(c_434,plain,
    set_intersection2('#skF_12','#skF_13') = '#skF_3',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_90,c_422]) ).

tff(c_656,plain,
    ! [C_118,A_119,B_120] :
      ( ( set_intersection2(relation_image(C_118,A_119),relation_image(C_118,B_120)) = relation_image(C_118,set_intersection2(A_119,B_120)) )
      | ~ one_to_one(C_118)
      | ~ function(C_118)
      | ~ relation(C_118) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_142]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_9] :
      ( disjoint(A_8,B_9)
      | ( set_intersection2(A_8,B_9) != empty_set ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_57]) ).

tff(c_397,plain,
    ! [A_77,B_78] :
      ( disjoint(A_77,B_78)
      | ( set_intersection2(A_77,B_78) != '#skF_3' ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_144,c_18]) ).

tff(c_86,plain,
    ~ disjoint(relation_image('#skF_14','#skF_12'),relation_image('#skF_14','#skF_13')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_404,plain,
    set_intersection2(relation_image('#skF_14','#skF_12'),relation_image('#skF_14','#skF_13')) != '#skF_3',
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_397,c_86]) ).

tff(c_664,plain,
    ( ( relation_image('#skF_14',set_intersection2('#skF_12','#skF_13')) != '#skF_3' )
    | ~ one_to_one('#skF_14')
    | ~ function('#skF_14')
    | ~ relation('#skF_14') ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_656,c_404]) ).

tff(c_730,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_94,c_92,c_88,c_258,c_434,c_664]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SEU056+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:49:48 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.33/1.97  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.33/1.97  
% 4.33/1.97  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.33/2.00  
% 4.33/2.00  Inference rules
% 4.33/2.00  ----------------------
% 4.33/2.00  #Ref     : 0
% 4.33/2.00  #Sup     : 151
% 4.33/2.00  #Fact    : 0
% 4.33/2.00  #Define  : 0
% 4.33/2.00  #Split   : 2
% 4.33/2.00  #Chain   : 0
% 4.33/2.00  #Close   : 0
% 4.33/2.00  
% 4.33/2.00  Ordering : KBO
% 4.33/2.00  
% 4.33/2.00  Simplification rules
% 4.33/2.00  ----------------------
% 4.33/2.00  #Subsume      : 9
% 4.33/2.00  #Demod        : 68
% 4.33/2.00  #Tautology    : 93
% 4.33/2.00  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.33/2.00  #BackRed      : 11
% 4.33/2.00  
% 4.33/2.00  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.33/2.00  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.33/2.00  
% 4.33/2.00  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.33/2.00  ----------------------
% 4.33/2.00  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 4.33/2.00  Parsing              : 0.27
% 4.33/2.00  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 4.33/2.00  Main loop            : 0.46
% 4.33/2.00  Inferencing          : 0.17
% 4.33/2.00  Reduction            : 0.14
% 4.33/2.00  Demodulation         : 0.10
% 4.33/2.00  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 4.33/2.00  Subsumption          : 0.09
% 4.33/2.00  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.33/2.00  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.33/2.00  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.33/2.00  Total                : 1.01
% 4.33/2.00  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.33/2.00  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.33/2.00  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.33/2.00  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------