TSTP Solution File: SEU048+1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SEU048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:18:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.67s 0.85s
% Output   : Refutation 0.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  16 unt;   3 nHn;  21 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   58 (  12 equ;  32 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ one_to_one(X)
    | ~ in(Y,relation_dom(X))
    | ~ in(Z,relation_dom(X))
    | apply(X,Y) != apply(X,Z)
    | Y = Z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X),relation_dom(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | in('SKOLEMAAAV2'(X),relation_dom(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(8,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | apply(X,'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X)) = apply(X,'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | one_to_one(X)
    | 'SKOLEMAAAV1'(X) != 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | relation(relation_rng_restriction(Y,X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k8_relat_1) ).

cnf(15,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | function(relation_rng_restriction(Y,X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fc5_funct_1) ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | X != relation_rng_restriction(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,relation_dom(X))
    | in(U,relation_dom(Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t85_funct_1) ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ relation(X)
    | ~ function(X)
    | ~ relation(Y)
    | ~ function(Y)
    | X != relation_rng_restriction(Z,Y)
    | ~ in(U,relation_dom(X))
    | apply(X,U) = apply(Y,U) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t85_funct_1) ).

cnf(58,negated_conjecture,
    relation('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t99_funct_1) ).

cnf(59,negated_conjecture,
    function('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t99_funct_1) ).

cnf(60,negated_conjecture,
    one_to_one('SKOLEMAAAV17'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t99_funct_1) ).

cnf(61,negated_conjecture,
    ~ one_to_one(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t99_funct_1) ).

cnf(79,plain,
    relation(relation_rng_restriction(X,'SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[10,58]) ).

cnf(99,plain,
    function(relation_rng_restriction(X,'SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[15,58,59]) ).

cnf(177,plain,
    'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17')) != 'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,99,79,61]) ).

cnf(178,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17')),relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[7,99,79,61]) ).

cnf(179,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17')),relation_dom(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,99,79,61]) ).

cnf(182,plain,
    apply(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))) = apply(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'),'SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[8,99,79,61]) ).

cnf(643,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17')),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[47,178,79,99,58,59,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(654,plain,
    apply(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))) = apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[50,178,79,99,58,59,theory(equality)]),182,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(719,plain,
    in('SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17')),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV17')),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[47,179,79,99,58,59,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(723,plain,
    apply(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'),'SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))) = apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[50,179,79,99,58,59,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(725,plain,
    apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV1'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))) = apply('SKOLEMAAAV17','SKOLEMAAAV2'(relation_rng_restriction('SKOLEMAAAV16','SKOLEMAAAV17'))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[654,723,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(731,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[5,719,58,59,60,643,177]),725,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SEU048+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 08:01:25 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T08:01:25
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n026.cluster.edu at 2022-06-19T08:01:25
% 0.19/0.48  WARNING:
% 0.19/0.48     |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.67/0.85  
% 0.67/0.85  
% 0.67/0.85  #||
% 0.67/0.85  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.67/0.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.70/0.85  ||#
% 0.70/0.85  
% 0.70/0.85  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.70/0.85  ;      1600 formulas have been input or derived (from 240 formulas).
% 0.70/0.85  ;       731 (46%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.70/0.85  ;           65 ( 9%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.70/0.85  ;          666 (91%) are still being kept.
% 0.70/0.85  ; 
% 0.70/0.85  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.007   2%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.001   0%   Assert                       (35 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.066  17%   Process new row              (1,345 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.207  53%   Resolution                   (478 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.003   1%   Paramodulation               (239 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (8 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.006   2%   Condensing                   (353 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.026   7%   Forward subsumption          (353 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.014   4%   Backward subsumption         (303 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (396 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.021   5%   Forward simplification       (1,198 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.006   2%   Backward simplification      (731 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.008   2%   Ordering                     (1,103 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.024   6%   Other
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.390        Total
% 0.70/0.85  ;     0.394        Real time
% 0.70/0.85  ; 
% 0.70/0.85  ; Term-hash-array has 1,635 terms in all.
% 0.70/0.86  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 282 entries (283 at peak, 303 added, 21 deleted).
% 0.70/0.86  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,678 nodes (2,692 at peak, 2,906 added, 228 deleted).
% 0.70/0.86  ;  Retrieved 404 possibly forward subsuming rows in 353 calls.
% 0.70/0.86  ;  Retrieved 46 possibly backward subsumed rows in 303 calls.
% 0.70/0.86  ; Path-index has 1,559 entries (1,559 at peak, 1,718 added, 159 deleted).
% 0.70/0.86  ; Path-index has 1,840 nodes (1,845 at peak, 1,924 added, 84 deleted).
% 0.70/0.86  ; Trie-index has 1,559 entries (1,559 at peak, 1,718 added, 159 deleted).
% 0.70/0.86  ; Trie-index has 5,402 nodes (5,402 at peak, 5,822 added, 420 deleted).
% 0.70/0.86  ; Retrieved 857 generalization terms in 6,207 calls.
% 0.70/0.86  ; Retrieved 440 instance terms in 427 calls.
% 0.70/0.86  ; Retrieved 236,737 unifiable terms in 47,783 calls.
% 0.70/0.86  ; 
% 0.70/0.86  ; The agenda of rows to process has 1 entry:
% 0.70/0.86  ;     1 with value 26
% 0.70/0.86  ; The agenda of rows to give has 441 entries:
% 0.70/0.86  ;    41 with value (4 14)          3 with value (4 30)           9 with value (4 51)
% 0.70/0.86  ;    51 with value (4 15)          3 with value (4 31)           9 with value (4 52)
% 0.70/0.86  ;    26 with value (4 16)          3 with value (4 32)           9 with value (4 61)
% 0.70/0.86  ;    20 with value (4 17)          3 with value (4 33)           9 with value (4 63)
% 0.70/0.86  ;    25 with value (4 18)          6 with value (4 34)           9 with value (4 64)
% 0.70/0.86  ;    30 with value (4 19)          3 with value (4 35)           9 with value (4 66)
% 0.70/0.86  ;    22 with value (4 20)          9 with value (4 36)           9 with value (4 67)
% 0.70/0.86  ;     1 with value (4 21)          3 with value (4 37)           9 with value (4 69)
% 0.70/0.86  ;     4 with value (4 22)          3 with value (4 40)           9 with value (4 76)
% 0.70/0.86  ;     5 with value (4 23)          3 with value (4 42)           9 with value (4 77)
% 0.70/0.86  ;     4 with value (4 24)          3 with value (4 43)           9 with value (4 78)
% 0.70/0.86  ;     4 with value (4 26)          3 with value (4 45)           9 with value (4 79)
% 0.70/0.86  ;     2 with value (4 27)          9 with value (4 49)           9 with value (4 88)
% 0.70/0.86  ;     5 with value (4 28)         12 with value (4 50)           9 with value (4 90)
% 0.70/0.86  ;     9 with value (4 29)
% 0.70/0.86  Evaluation took:
% 0.70/0.86    0.395 seconds of real time
% 0.70/0.86    0.381574 seconds of user run time
% 0.70/0.86    0.012823 seconds of system run time
% 0.70/0.86    [Run times include 0.015 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.70/0.86    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.70/0.86    0 page faults and
% 0.70/0.86    32,201,344 bytes consed.
% 0.70/0.86  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.70/0.86  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-19T08:01:25
% 0.70/0.86  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.70/0.86  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------