TSTP Solution File: SEU046+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SEU046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 14:26:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.76s 0.94s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : SEU046+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 12:28:32 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36 Sun Jun 19 12:28:32 2022
% 0.20/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 7908.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=9.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -relation(A)| -function(A)|relation(relation_rng_restriction(B,A)).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [] {-} empty(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 51 during input processing: 0 [] {-} relation(empty_set).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 73 during input processing: 0 [copy,73,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.36 73 back subsumes 47.
% 0.20/0.36 73 back subsumes 42.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.53 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.53 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.53 number of clauses in intial UL: 45
% 0.20/0.53 number of clauses initially in problem: 71
% 0.20/0.53 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 63
% 0.20/0.53 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 70
% 0.20/0.53 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.53 absolute distinct symbol count: 31
% 0.20/0.53 distinct predicate count: 9
% 0.20/0.53 distinct function count: 11
% 0.20/0.53 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.76/0.94 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.76/0.94 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.76/0.94 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 2 [ 2 1 2397 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 3 [ 1 1 5132 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 4 [ 5 0 502 ] (0.00 seconds, 950 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 true clauses given 1 (10.0%)
% 0.76/0.94 false clauses given 9
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 FALSE TRUE
% 0.76/0.94 2 4 14
% 0.76/0.94 3 5 6
% 0.76/0.94 4 1 4
% 0.76/0.94 5 2 3
% 0.76/0.94 6 1 1
% 0.76/0.94 7 2 1
% 0.76/0.94 8 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 9 1 0
% 0.76/0.94 10 1 2
% 0.76/0.94 11 0 4
% 0.76/0.94 12 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 19 0 4
% 0.76/0.94 20 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 22 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 24 1 0
% 0.76/0.94 29 0 4
% 0.76/0.94 30 0 4
% 0.76/0.94 31 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 33 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 35 0 4
% 0.76/0.94 36 0 4
% 0.76/0.94 37 0 4
% 0.76/0.94 41 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 42 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 43 0 4
% 0.76/0.94 45 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 48 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 49 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 50 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 51 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 52 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 57 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 59 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 60 0 1
% 0.76/0.94 tot: 18 80 (81.6% true)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 Model 4 [ 5 0 502 ] (0.00 seconds, 950 Inserts)
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.76/0.94 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.76/0.94 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.76/0.94 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94
% 0.76/0.94 The job finished Sun Jun 19 12:28:33 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------