TSTP Solution File: SEU023+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SEU023+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:57:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 9.05s 3.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   36
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (  15 unt;  32 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   96 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  113 (  51   ~;  35   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   30 (  21   >;   9   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   24 (  24 usr;  11 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (;  19   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ subset > in > element > relation_empty_yielding > relation > one_to_one > function > empty > relation_composition > apply > #nlpp > relation_rng > relation_dom > powerset > function_inverse > empty_set > #skF_4 > #skF_17 > #skF_11 > #skF_1 > #skF_8 > #skF_7 > #skF_13 > #skF_10 > #skF_16 > #skF_14 > #skF_12 > #skF_5 > #skF_6 > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_9 > #skF_15

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(relation,type,
    relation: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i ).

tff(apply,type,
    apply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(element,type,
    element: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(one_to_one,type,
    one_to_one: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': $i > $i ).

tff(function,type,
    function: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i ).

tff(relation_empty_yielding,type,
    relation_empty_yielding: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(in,type,
    in: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': $i ).

tff(subset,type,
    subset: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(function_inverse,type,
    function_inverse: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': $i ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': $i ).

tff(relation_composition,type,
    relation_composition: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(empty,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': $i ).

tff(empty_set,type,
    empty_set: $i ).

tff(relation_dom,type,
    relation_dom: $i > $i ).

tff(powerset,type,
    powerset: $i > $i ).

tff(relation_rng,type,
    relation_rng: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_264,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B] :
        ( ( relation(B)
          & function(B) )
       => ( ( one_to_one(B)
            & in(A,relation_dom(B)) )
         => ( ( A = apply(function_inverse(B),apply(B,A)) )
            & ( A = apply(relation_composition(B,function_inverse(B)),A) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t56_funct_1) ).

tff(f_59,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( relation(A)
        & function(A) )
     => ( relation(function_inverse(A))
        & function(function_inverse(A)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_k2_funct_1) ).

tff(f_251,axiom,
    ! [A] :
      ( ( relation(A)
        & function(A) )
     => ( one_to_one(A)
       => ! [B] :
            ( ( relation(B)
              & function(B) )
           => ( ( B = function_inverse(A) )
            <=> ( ( relation_dom(B) = relation_rng(A) )
                & ! [C,D] :
                    ( ( ( in(C,relation_rng(A))
                        & ( D = apply(B,C) ) )
                     => ( in(D,relation_dom(A))
                        & ( C = apply(A,D) ) ) )
                    & ( ( in(D,relation_dom(A))
                        & ( C = apply(A,D) ) )
                     => ( in(C,relation_rng(A))
                        & ( D = apply(B,C) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t54_funct_1) ).

tff(f_203,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ( relation(B)
        & function(B) )
     => ! [C] :
          ( ( relation(C)
            & function(C) )
         => ( in(A,relation_dom(B))
           => ( apply(relation_composition(B,C),A) = apply(C,apply(B,A)) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).

tff(c_150,plain,
    relation('#skF_17'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_264]) ).

tff(c_148,plain,
    function('#skF_17'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_264]) ).

tff(c_14,plain,
    ! [A_6] :
      ( function(function_inverse(A_6))
      | ~ function(A_6)
      | ~ relation(A_6) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [A_6] :
      ( relation(function_inverse(A_6))
      | ~ function(A_6)
      | ~ relation(A_6) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_59]) ).

tff(c_146,plain,
    one_to_one('#skF_17'),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_264]) ).

tff(c_144,plain,
    in('#skF_16',relation_dom('#skF_17')),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_264]) ).

tff(c_3019,plain,
    ! [A_198,D_199] :
      ( ( apply(function_inverse(A_198),apply(A_198,D_199)) = D_199 )
      | ~ in(D_199,relation_dom(A_198))
      | ~ function(function_inverse(A_198))
      | ~ relation(function_inverse(A_198))
      | ~ one_to_one(A_198)
      | ~ function(A_198)
      | ~ relation(A_198) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_251]) ).

tff(c_142,plain,
    ( ( apply(relation_composition('#skF_17',function_inverse('#skF_17')),'#skF_16') != '#skF_16' )
    | ( apply(function_inverse('#skF_17'),apply('#skF_17','#skF_16')) != '#skF_16' ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_264]) ).

tff(c_189,plain,
    apply(function_inverse('#skF_17'),apply('#skF_17','#skF_16')) != '#skF_16',
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_142]) ).

tff(c_3037,plain,
    ( ~ in('#skF_16',relation_dom('#skF_17'))
    | ~ function(function_inverse('#skF_17'))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse('#skF_17'))
    | ~ one_to_one('#skF_17')
    | ~ function('#skF_17')
    | ~ relation('#skF_17') ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3019,c_189]) ).

tff(c_3051,plain,
    ( ~ function(function_inverse('#skF_17'))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse('#skF_17')) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_148,c_146,c_144,c_3037]) ).

tff(c_3054,plain,
    ~ relation(function_inverse('#skF_17')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_3051]) ).

tff(c_3057,plain,
    ( ~ function('#skF_17')
    | ~ relation('#skF_17') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_3054]) ).

tff(c_3064,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_148,c_3057]) ).

tff(c_3065,plain,
    ~ function(function_inverse('#skF_17')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_3051]) ).

tff(c_3292,plain,
    ( ~ function('#skF_17')
    | ~ relation('#skF_17') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_3065]) ).

tff(c_3299,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_148,c_3292]) ).

tff(c_3301,plain,
    apply(function_inverse('#skF_17'),apply('#skF_17','#skF_16')) = '#skF_16',
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_142]) ).

tff(c_5567,plain,
    ! [B_312,C_313,A_314] :
      ( ( apply(relation_composition(B_312,C_313),A_314) = apply(C_313,apply(B_312,A_314)) )
      | ~ in(A_314,relation_dom(B_312))
      | ~ function(C_313)
      | ~ relation(C_313)
      | ~ function(B_312)
      | ~ relation(B_312) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_203]) ).

tff(c_5578,plain,
    ! [C_313] :
      ( ( apply(relation_composition('#skF_17',C_313),'#skF_16') = apply(C_313,apply('#skF_17','#skF_16')) )
      | ~ function(C_313)
      | ~ relation(C_313)
      | ~ function('#skF_17')
      | ~ relation('#skF_17') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_144,c_5567]) ).

tff(c_8783,plain,
    ! [C_381] :
      ( ( apply(relation_composition('#skF_17',C_381),'#skF_16') = apply(C_381,apply('#skF_17','#skF_16')) )
      | ~ function(C_381)
      | ~ relation(C_381) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_148,c_5578]) ).

tff(c_3300,plain,
    apply(relation_composition('#skF_17',function_inverse('#skF_17')),'#skF_16') != '#skF_16',
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_142]) ).

tff(c_8795,plain,
    ( ( apply(function_inverse('#skF_17'),apply('#skF_17','#skF_16')) != '#skF_16' )
    | ~ function(function_inverse('#skF_17'))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse('#skF_17')) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8783,c_3300]) ).

tff(c_8824,plain,
    ( ~ function(function_inverse('#skF_17'))
    | ~ relation(function_inverse('#skF_17')) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3301,c_8795]) ).

tff(c_8828,plain,
    ~ relation(function_inverse('#skF_17')),
    inference(splitLeft,[status(thm)],[c_8824]) ).

tff(c_8831,plain,
    ( ~ function('#skF_17')
    | ~ relation('#skF_17') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_8828]) ).

tff(c_8838,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_148,c_8831]) ).

tff(c_8839,plain,
    ~ function(function_inverse('#skF_17')),
    inference(splitRight,[status(thm)],[c_8824]) ).

tff(c_8843,plain,
    ( ~ function('#skF_17')
    | ~ relation('#skF_17') ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_8839]) ).

tff(c_8850,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_148,c_8843]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : SEU023+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 11:31:18 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 9.05/3.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.05/3.43  
% 9.05/3.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 9.05/3.46  
% 9.05/3.46  Inference rules
% 9.05/3.46  ----------------------
% 9.05/3.46  #Ref     : 0
% 9.05/3.46  #Sup     : 1995
% 9.05/3.46  #Fact    : 0
% 9.05/3.46  #Define  : 0
% 9.05/3.46  #Split   : 10
% 9.05/3.46  #Chain   : 0
% 9.05/3.46  #Close   : 0
% 9.05/3.46  
% 9.05/3.46  Ordering : KBO
% 9.05/3.46  
% 9.05/3.46  Simplification rules
% 9.05/3.46  ----------------------
% 9.05/3.46  #Subsume      : 352
% 9.05/3.46  #Demod        : 2268
% 9.05/3.46  #Tautology    : 1237
% 9.05/3.46  #SimpNegUnit  : 21
% 9.05/3.46  #BackRed      : 24
% 9.05/3.46  
% 9.05/3.46  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 9.05/3.46  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 9.05/3.46  
% 9.05/3.46  Timing (in seconds)
% 9.05/3.46  ----------------------
% 9.05/3.46  Preprocessing        : 0.65
% 9.05/3.46  Parsing              : 0.33
% 9.05/3.46  CNF conversion       : 0.05
% 9.05/3.47  Main loop            : 1.55
% 9.05/3.47  Inferencing          : 0.52
% 9.05/3.47  Reduction            : 0.51
% 9.05/3.47  Demodulation         : 0.37
% 9.05/3.47  BG Simplification    : 0.06
% 9.05/3.47  Subsumption          : 0.36
% 9.05/3.47  Abstraction          : 0.06
% 9.05/3.47  MUC search           : 0.00
% 9.05/3.47  Cooper               : 0.00
% 9.05/3.47  Total                : 2.25
% 9.05/3.47  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 9.05/3.47  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 9.05/3.47  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 9.05/3.47  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------