TSTP Solution File: SEU014+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : SEU014+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 17:42:18 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 16.04s 2.93s
% Output   : Proof 16.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SEU014+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.17/0.35  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Aug 23 14:02:09 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.59  ________       _____
% 0.22/0.59  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.22/0.59  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.22/0.59  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.22/0.59  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.22/0.59  
% 0.22/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.22/0.59  (2023-06-19)
% 0.22/0.59  
% 0.22/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.22/0.59  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.22/0.59                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.22/0.59  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.22/0.59  
% 0.22/0.59  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.22/0.59  
% 0.22/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.22/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.22/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.22/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.22/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.22/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.22/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.22/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.22/0.62  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.73/1.09  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.73/1.09  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.15/1.13  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.15/1.13  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.15/1.13  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 3.15/1.13  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.15/1.13  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 6.51/1.63  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.84/1.65  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.84/1.67  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.84/1.68  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.84/1.69  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.84/1.69  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 6.84/1.70  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 7.93/1.84  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.32/1.88  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.41/2.02  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 10.42/2.15  Prover 3: gave up
% 10.42/2.16  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 10.42/2.20  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 10.42/2.32  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.42/2.33  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.04/2.93  Prover 7: Found proof (size 68)
% 16.04/2.93  Prover 7: proved (768ms)
% 16.04/2.93  Prover 1: stopped
% 16.04/2.93  Prover 6: stopped
% 16.04/2.93  Prover 2: stopped
% 16.04/2.93  Prover 5: stopped
% 16.04/2.93  Prover 0: stopped
% 16.04/2.93  Prover 4: stopped
% 16.04/2.93  
% 16.04/2.93  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 16.04/2.93  
% 16.04/2.94  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 16.04/2.95  Assumptions after simplification:
% 16.04/2.95  ---------------------------------
% 16.04/2.95  
% 16.04/2.95    (d8_funct_1)
% 16.04/2.98     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : (v3 = v2
% 16.04/2.98      |  ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ (apply(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (apply(v0, v2) =
% 16.04/2.98        v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ one_to_one(v0) |  ~
% 16.04/2.98      relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) |  ~ in(v3, v1) |  ~ in(v2, v1)) &  ! [v0:
% 16.04/2.98      $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 16.04/2.98      relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) | one_to_one(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i]
% 16.04/2.98      :  ? [v4: $i] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & apply(v0, v3) = v4 & apply(v0, v2) = v4 &
% 16.04/2.98        $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & in(v3, v1) & in(v2, v1)))
% 16.04/2.98  
% 16.04/2.98    (dt_k5_relat_1)
% 16.04/2.98     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(v0, v1) =
% 16.04/2.98        v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~ relation(v0) |
% 16.04/2.98      relation(v2))
% 16.04/2.98  
% 16.04/2.98    (fc1_funct_1)
% 16.04/2.98     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(v0, v1) =
% 16.04/2.98        v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ~
% 16.04/2.98      function(v1) |  ~ function(v0) | relation(v2)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :
% 16.04/2.98     ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0)
% 16.04/2.98      |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v1) |  ~ function(v0) |
% 16.04/2.98      function(v2))
% 16.04/2.98  
% 16.04/2.98    (t23_funct_1)
% 16.54/2.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (apply(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 16.54/2.99      |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~ function(v1) |  ? [v3: $i] :
% 16.54/2.99      (relation_dom(v1) = v3 & $i(v3) &  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5: $i] : ( ~
% 16.54/2.99          (relation_composition(v1, v4) = v5) |  ~ $i(v4) |  ~ relation(v4) |  ~
% 16.54/2.99          function(v4) |  ~ in(v0, v3) |  ? [v6: $i] : (apply(v5, v0) = v6 &
% 16.54/2.99            apply(v4, v2) = v6 & $i(v6))) &  ! [v4: $i] :  ! [v5: $i] : ( ~
% 16.54/2.99          (apply(v4, v2) = v5) |  ~ $i(v4) |  ~ relation(v4) |  ~ function(v4) | 
% 16.54/2.99          ~ in(v0, v3) |  ? [v6: $i] : (relation_composition(v1, v4) = v6 &
% 16.54/2.99            apply(v6, v0) = v5 & $i(v6) & $i(v5)))))
% 16.54/2.99  
% 16.54/2.99    (t46_relat_1)
% 16.54/2.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_rng(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 16.54/2.99      relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] : (relation_dom(v0) = v2 & $i(v2) &  ! [v3: $i] :
% 16.54/2.99         ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~
% 16.54/2.99          relation(v3) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : ((v6 = v2 & relation_dom(v4)
% 16.54/2.99              = v2) | (relation_dom(v3) = v5 & $i(v5) &  ~ subset(v1, v5)))) &  !
% 16.54/2.99        [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~
% 16.54/2.99          subset(v1, v4) |  ~ relation(v3) |  ? [v5: $i] :
% 16.54/2.99          (relation_composition(v0, v3) = v5 & relation_dom(v5) = v2 & $i(v5)))))
% 16.54/2.99    &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 16.54/2.99      relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] : (relation_rng(v0) = v2 & $i(v2) &  ! [v3: $i] :
% 16.54/2.99         ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~
% 16.54/2.99          relation(v3) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : ((v6 = v1 & relation_dom(v4)
% 16.54/2.99              = v1 & $i(v1)) | (relation_dom(v3) = v5 & $i(v5) &  ~ subset(v2,
% 16.54/2.99                v5)))) &  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v3) = v4) |
% 16.54/2.99           ~ $i(v3) |  ~ subset(v2, v4) |  ~ relation(v3) |  ? [v5: $i] :
% 16.54/2.99          (relation_composition(v0, v3) = v5 & relation_dom(v5) = v1 & $i(v5) &
% 16.54/2.99            $i(v1)))))
% 16.54/2.99  
% 16.54/2.99    (t47_funct_1)
% 16.54/2.99     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] :
% 16.54/2.99    (relation_rng(v2) = v4 & relation_composition(v2, v0) = v3 & relation_dom(v0)
% 16.54/2.99      = v1 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & subset(v4, v1) &
% 16.54/2.99      one_to_one(v3) & relation(v2) & relation(v0) & function(v2) & function(v0) &
% 16.54/2.99       ~ one_to_one(v2))
% 16.54/2.99  
% 16.54/2.99    (function-axioms)
% 16.54/2.99     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.54/2.99      (relation_composition(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_composition(v3, v2) =
% 16.54/2.99        v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 | 
% 16.54/2.99      ~ (apply(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apply(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 16.54/2.99      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_rng(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 16.54/2.99      (relation_rng(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 16.54/2.99      v0 |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v1) |  ~ (powerset(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 16.54/2.99    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (relation_dom(v2) = v1) |  ~
% 16.54/2.99      (relation_dom(v2) = v0))
% 16.54/2.99  
% 16.54/2.99  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 16.54/2.99  --------------------------------------------
% 16.54/3.00  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, cc1_funct_1, cc1_relat_1, existence_m1_subset_1,
% 16.54/3.00  fc10_relat_1, fc12_relat_1, fc1_subset_1, fc1_xboole_0, fc4_relat_1,
% 16.54/3.00  fc5_relat_1, fc6_relat_1, fc7_relat_1, fc8_relat_1, fc9_relat_1, rc1_funct_1,
% 16.54/3.00  rc1_relat_1, rc1_subset_1, rc1_xboole_0, rc2_relat_1, rc2_subset_1,
% 16.54/3.00  rc2_xboole_0, rc3_relat_1, reflexivity_r1_tarski, t1_subset, t2_subset,
% 16.54/3.00  t3_subset, t4_subset, t5_subset, t6_boole, t7_boole, t8_boole
% 16.54/3.00  
% 16.54/3.00  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 16.54/3.00  ---------------------------------
% 16.54/3.00  
% 16.54/3.00  Begin of proof
% 16.54/3.00  | 
% 16.54/3.00  | ALPHA: (d8_funct_1) implies:
% 16.54/3.00  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 16.54/3.00  |          ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) | one_to_one(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ?
% 16.54/3.00  |          [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & apply(v0, v3) = v4 &
% 16.54/3.00  |            apply(v0, v2) = v4 & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & in(v3, v1) & in(v2,
% 16.54/3.00  |              v1)))
% 16.54/3.00  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :
% 16.54/3.00  |        (v3 = v2 |  ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ (apply(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~
% 16.54/3.00  |          (apply(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 16.54/3.00  |          one_to_one(v0) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) |  ~ in(v3, v1) | 
% 16.54/3.00  |          ~ in(v2, v1))
% 16.54/3.00  | 
% 16.54/3.00  | ALPHA: (fc1_funct_1) implies:
% 16.54/3.00  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(v0,
% 16.54/3.00  |              v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~
% 16.54/3.00  |          relation(v0) |  ~ function(v1) |  ~ function(v0) | function(v2))
% 16.54/3.00  | 
% 16.54/3.00  | ALPHA: (t46_relat_1) implies:
% 16.54/3.00  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 16.54/3.00  |          ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] : (relation_rng(v0) = v2 & $i(v2) &  !
% 16.54/3.00  |            [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(v0, v3) = v4) | 
% 16.54/3.00  |              ~ $i(v3) |  ~ relation(v3) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : ((v6 =
% 16.54/3.00  |                  v1 & relation_dom(v4) = v1 & $i(v1)) | (relation_dom(v3) = v5
% 16.54/3.00  |                  & $i(v5) &  ~ subset(v2, v5)))) &  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] :
% 16.54/3.00  |            ( ~ (relation_dom(v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ subset(v2, v4) |  ~
% 16.54/3.00  |              relation(v3) |  ? [v5: $i] : (relation_composition(v0, v3) = v5 &
% 16.54/3.00  |                relation_dom(v5) = v1 & $i(v5) & $i(v1)))))
% 16.54/3.00  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_rng(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 16.54/3.00  |          ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] : (relation_dom(v0) = v2 & $i(v2) &  !
% 16.54/3.00  |            [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(v0, v3) = v4) | 
% 16.54/3.00  |              ~ $i(v3) |  ~ relation(v3) |  ? [v5: $i] :  ? [v6: $i] : ((v6 =
% 16.54/3.00  |                  v2 & relation_dom(v4) = v2) | (relation_dom(v3) = v5 & $i(v5)
% 16.54/3.00  |                  &  ~ subset(v1, v5)))) &  ! [v3: $i] :  ! [v4: $i] : ( ~
% 16.54/3.00  |              (relation_dom(v3) = v4) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ subset(v1, v4) |  ~
% 16.54/3.00  |              relation(v3) |  ? [v5: $i] : (relation_composition(v0, v3) = v5 &
% 16.54/3.00  |                relation_dom(v5) = v2 & $i(v5)))))
% 16.54/3.00  | 
% 16.54/3.00  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 16.54/3.00  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.54/3.01  |          (relation_dom(v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_dom(v2) = v0))
% 16.54/3.01  |   (7)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.54/3.01  |          (apply(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (apply(v3, v2) = v0))
% 16.54/3.01  |   (8)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 16.54/3.01  |          (relation_composition(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (relation_composition(v3,
% 16.54/3.01  |              v2) = v0))
% 16.54/3.01  | 
% 16.54/3.01  | DELTA: instantiating (t47_funct_1) with fresh symbols all_43_0, all_43_1,
% 16.54/3.01  |        all_43_2, all_43_3, all_43_4 gives:
% 16.54/3.01  |   (9)  relation_rng(all_43_2) = all_43_0 & relation_composition(all_43_2,
% 16.54/3.01  |          all_43_4) = all_43_1 & relation_dom(all_43_4) = all_43_3 &
% 16.54/3.01  |        $i(all_43_0) & $i(all_43_1) & $i(all_43_2) & $i(all_43_3) &
% 16.54/3.01  |        $i(all_43_4) & subset(all_43_0, all_43_3) & one_to_one(all_43_1) &
% 16.54/3.01  |        relation(all_43_2) & relation(all_43_4) & function(all_43_2) &
% 16.54/3.01  |        function(all_43_4) &  ~ one_to_one(all_43_2)
% 16.54/3.01  | 
% 16.54/3.01  | ALPHA: (9) implies:
% 16.54/3.01  |   (10)   ~ one_to_one(all_43_2)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (11)  function(all_43_4)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (12)  function(all_43_2)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (13)  relation(all_43_4)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (14)  relation(all_43_2)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (15)  one_to_one(all_43_1)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (16)  subset(all_43_0, all_43_3)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (17)  $i(all_43_4)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (18)  $i(all_43_2)
% 16.54/3.01  |   (19)  relation_dom(all_43_4) = all_43_3
% 16.54/3.01  |   (20)  relation_composition(all_43_2, all_43_4) = all_43_1
% 16.54/3.01  |   (21)  relation_rng(all_43_2) = all_43_0
% 16.54/3.01  | 
% 16.54/3.01  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_43_2, all_43_4, all_43_1, simplifying
% 16.54/3.01  |              with (11), (12), (13), (14), (17), (18), (20) gives:
% 16.54/3.01  |   (22)  function(all_43_1)
% 16.54/3.01  | 
% 16.54/3.01  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (dt_k5_relat_1) with all_43_2, all_43_4, all_43_1,
% 16.54/3.01  |              simplifying with (13), (14), (17), (18), (20) gives:
% 16.54/3.01  |   (23)  relation(all_43_1)
% 16.54/3.01  | 
% 16.54/3.01  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_43_2, all_43_0, simplifying with (14),
% 16.54/3.01  |              (18), (21) gives:
% 16.54/3.01  |   (24)   ? [v0: $i] : (relation_dom(all_43_2) = v0 & $i(v0) &  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.01  |           [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_2, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 16.54/3.01  |             |  ~ relation(v1) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : ((v4 = v0 &
% 16.54/3.01  |                 relation_dom(v2) = v0) | (relation_dom(v1) = v3 & $i(v3) &  ~
% 16.54/3.01  |                 subset(all_43_0, v3)))) &  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 16.54/3.01  |             (relation_dom(v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ subset(all_43_0, v2) |  ~
% 16.54/3.01  |             relation(v1) |  ? [v3: $i] : (relation_composition(all_43_2, v1) =
% 16.54/3.01  |               v3 & relation_dom(v3) = v0 & $i(v3))))
% 16.54/3.01  | 
% 16.54/3.01  | DELTA: instantiating (24) with fresh symbol all_55_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.01  |   (25)  relation_dom(all_43_2) = all_55_0 & $i(all_55_0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.01  |         [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 16.54/3.01  |            ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: int] : ((v3 = all_55_0 &
% 16.54/3.01  |               relation_dom(v1) = all_55_0) | (relation_dom(v0) = v2 & $i(v2) &
% 16.54/3.01  |                ~ subset(all_43_0, v2)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 16.54/3.01  |           (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ subset(all_43_0, v1) |  ~
% 16.54/3.01  |           relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] : (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) =
% 16.54/3.01  |             v2 & relation_dom(v2) = all_55_0 & $i(v2)))
% 16.54/3.01  | 
% 16.54/3.01  | ALPHA: (25) implies:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (26)  relation_dom(all_43_2) = all_55_0
% 16.54/3.02  |   (27)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 16.54/3.02  |           ~ subset(all_43_0, v1) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :
% 16.54/3.02  |           (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) = v2 & relation_dom(v2) =
% 16.54/3.02  |             all_55_0 & $i(v2)))
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (27) with all_43_4, all_43_3, simplifying with
% 16.54/3.02  |              (13), (16), (17), (19) gives:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (28)   ? [v0: $i] : (relation_composition(all_43_2, all_43_4) = v0 &
% 16.54/3.02  |           relation_dom(v0) = all_55_0 & $i(v0))
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | DELTA: instantiating (28) with fresh symbol all_58_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (29)  relation_composition(all_43_2, all_43_4) = all_58_0 &
% 16.54/3.02  |         relation_dom(all_58_0) = all_55_0 & $i(all_58_0)
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | ALPHA: (29) implies:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (30)  $i(all_58_0)
% 16.54/3.02  |   (31)  relation_dom(all_58_0) = all_55_0
% 16.54/3.02  |   (32)  relation_composition(all_43_2, all_43_4) = all_58_0
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_43_1, all_58_0, all_43_4, all_43_2,
% 16.54/3.02  |              simplifying with (20), (32) gives:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (33)  all_58_0 = all_43_1
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | REDUCE: (31), (33) imply:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (34)  relation_dom(all_43_1) = all_55_0
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | REDUCE: (30), (33) imply:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (35)  $i(all_43_1)
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_43_2, all_55_0, simplifying with (10),
% 16.54/3.02  |              (12), (14), (18), (26) gives:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (36)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) &
% 16.54/3.02  |           apply(all_43_2, v1) = v2 & apply(all_43_2, v0) = v2 & $i(v2) &
% 16.54/3.02  |           $i(v1) & $i(v0) & in(v1, all_55_0) & in(v0, all_55_0))
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_43_1, all_55_0, simplifying with (23),
% 16.54/3.02  |              (34), (35) gives:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (37)   ? [v0: $i] : (relation_rng(all_43_1) = v0 & $i(v0) &  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.02  |           [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_1, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 16.54/3.02  |             |  ~ relation(v1) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: int] : ((v4 = all_55_0 &
% 16.54/3.02  |                 relation_dom(v2) = all_55_0 & $i(all_55_0)) |
% 16.54/3.02  |               (relation_dom(v1) = v3 & $i(v3) &  ~ subset(v0, v3)))) &  ! [v1:
% 16.54/3.02  |             $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 16.54/3.02  |             subset(v0, v2) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ? [v3: $i] :
% 16.54/3.02  |             (relation_composition(all_43_1, v1) = v3 & relation_dom(v3) =
% 16.54/3.02  |               all_55_0 & $i(v3) & $i(all_55_0))))
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | DELTA: instantiating (28) with fresh symbol all_77_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (38)  relation_composition(all_43_2, all_43_4) = all_77_0 &
% 16.54/3.02  |         relation_dom(all_77_0) = all_55_0 & $i(all_77_0)
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | ALPHA: (38) implies:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (39)  $i(all_77_0)
% 16.54/3.02  |   (40)  relation_dom(all_77_0) = all_55_0
% 16.54/3.02  |   (41)  relation_composition(all_43_2, all_43_4) = all_77_0
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | DELTA: instantiating (36) with fresh symbols all_79_0, all_79_1, all_79_2
% 16.54/3.02  |        gives:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (42)   ~ (all_79_1 = all_79_2) & apply(all_43_2, all_79_1) = all_79_0 &
% 16.54/3.02  |         apply(all_43_2, all_79_2) = all_79_0 & $i(all_79_0) & $i(all_79_1) &
% 16.54/3.02  |         $i(all_79_2) & in(all_79_1, all_55_0) & in(all_79_2, all_55_0)
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | ALPHA: (42) implies:
% 16.54/3.02  |   (43)   ~ (all_79_1 = all_79_2)
% 16.54/3.02  |   (44)  in(all_79_2, all_55_0)
% 16.54/3.02  |   (45)  in(all_79_1, all_55_0)
% 16.54/3.02  |   (46)  $i(all_79_2)
% 16.54/3.02  |   (47)  $i(all_79_1)
% 16.54/3.02  |   (48)  apply(all_43_2, all_79_2) = all_79_0
% 16.54/3.02  |   (49)  apply(all_43_2, all_79_1) = all_79_0
% 16.54/3.02  | 
% 16.54/3.02  | DELTA: instantiating (37) with fresh symbol all_84_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.03  |   (50)  relation_rng(all_43_1) = all_84_0 & $i(all_84_0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.03  |         [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_1, v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 16.54/3.03  |            ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: int] : ((v3 = all_55_0 &
% 16.54/3.03  |               relation_dom(v1) = all_55_0 & $i(all_55_0)) | (relation_dom(v0)
% 16.54/3.03  |               = v2 & $i(v2) &  ~ subset(all_84_0, v2)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.03  |         [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 16.54/3.03  |           subset(all_84_0, v1) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :
% 16.54/3.03  |           (relation_composition(all_43_1, v0) = v2 & relation_dom(v2) =
% 16.54/3.03  |             all_55_0 & $i(v2) & $i(all_55_0)))
% 16.54/3.03  | 
% 16.54/3.03  | ALPHA: (50) implies:
% 16.54/3.03  |   (51)  relation_rng(all_43_1) = all_84_0
% 16.54/3.03  | 
% 16.54/3.03  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with all_43_1, all_77_0, all_43_4, all_43_2,
% 16.54/3.03  |              simplifying with (20), (41) gives:
% 16.54/3.03  |   (52)  all_77_0 = all_43_1
% 16.54/3.03  | 
% 16.54/3.03  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t23_funct_1) with all_79_2, all_43_2, all_79_0,
% 16.54/3.03  |              simplifying with (12), (14), (18), (46), (48) gives:
% 16.54/3.03  |   (53)   ? [v0: $i] : (relation_dom(all_43_2) = v0 & $i(v0) &  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.03  |           [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_2, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 16.54/3.03  |             |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~ function(v1) |  ~ in(all_79_2, v0) |  ?
% 16.54/3.03  |             [v3: $i] : (apply(v2, all_79_2) = v3 & apply(v1, all_79_0) = v3 &
% 16.54/3.03  |               $i(v3))) &  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (apply(v1, all_79_0)
% 16.54/3.03  |               = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~ function(v1) |  ~
% 16.54/3.03  |             in(all_79_2, v0) |  ? [v3: $i] : (relation_composition(all_43_2,
% 16.54/3.03  |                 v1) = v3 & apply(v3, all_79_2) = v2 & $i(v3) & $i(v2))))
% 16.54/3.03  | 
% 16.54/3.03  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t23_funct_1) with all_79_1, all_43_2, all_79_0,
% 16.54/3.03  |              simplifying with (12), (14), (18), (47), (49) gives:
% 16.54/3.03  |   (54)   ? [v0: $i] : (relation_dom(all_43_2) = v0 & $i(v0) &  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.03  |           [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_2, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 16.54/3.03  |             |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~ function(v1) |  ~ in(all_79_1, v0) |  ?
% 16.54/3.03  |             [v3: $i] : (apply(v2, all_79_1) = v3 & apply(v1, all_79_0) = v3 &
% 16.54/3.03  |               $i(v3))) &  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (apply(v1, all_79_0)
% 16.54/3.03  |               = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ relation(v1) |  ~ function(v1) |  ~
% 16.54/3.03  |             in(all_79_1, v0) |  ? [v3: $i] : (relation_composition(all_43_2,
% 16.54/3.03  |                 v1) = v3 & apply(v3, all_79_1) = v2 & $i(v3) & $i(v2))))
% 16.54/3.03  | 
% 16.54/3.03  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_43_1, all_84_0, simplifying with (23),
% 16.54/3.03  |              (35), (51) gives:
% 16.54/3.03  |   (55)   ? [v0: $i] : (relation_dom(all_43_1) = v0 & $i(v0) &  ! [v1: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.03  |           [v2: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_1, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1)
% 16.54/3.03  |             |  ~ relation(v1) |  ? [v3: $i] :  ? [v4: $i] : ((v4 = v0 &
% 16.54/3.03  |                 relation_dom(v2) = v0) | (relation_dom(v1) = v3 & $i(v3) &  ~
% 16.54/3.03  |                 subset(all_84_0, v3)))) &  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 16.54/3.03  |             (relation_dom(v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ subset(all_84_0, v2) |  ~
% 16.54/3.03  |             relation(v1) |  ? [v3: $i] : (relation_composition(all_43_1, v1) =
% 16.54/3.03  |               v3 & relation_dom(v3) = v0 & $i(v3))))
% 16.54/3.03  | 
% 16.54/3.03  | DELTA: instantiating (55) with fresh symbol all_105_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.03  |   (56)  relation_dom(all_43_1) = all_105_0 & $i(all_105_0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.03  |         [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_1, v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 16.54/3.03  |            ~ relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: int] : ((v3 = all_105_0 &
% 16.54/3.03  |               relation_dom(v1) = all_105_0) | (relation_dom(v0) = v2 & $i(v2)
% 16.54/3.03  |               &  ~ subset(all_84_0, v2)))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~
% 16.54/3.03  |           (relation_dom(v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ subset(all_84_0, v1) |  ~
% 16.54/3.03  |           relation(v0) |  ? [v2: $i] : (relation_composition(all_43_1, v0) =
% 16.54/3.03  |             v2 & relation_dom(v2) = all_105_0 & $i(v2)))
% 16.54/3.03  | 
% 16.54/3.03  | ALPHA: (56) implies:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (57)  relation_dom(all_43_1) = all_105_0
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | DELTA: instantiating (54) with fresh symbol all_108_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (58)  relation_dom(all_43_2) = all_108_0 & $i(all_108_0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.04  |         [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 16.54/3.04  |            ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) |  ~ in(all_79_1, all_108_0) |  ?
% 16.54/3.04  |           [v2: $i] : (apply(v1, all_79_1) = v2 & apply(v0, all_79_0) = v2 &
% 16.54/3.04  |             $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (apply(v0, all_79_0) =
% 16.54/3.04  |             v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) |  ~
% 16.54/3.04  |           in(all_79_1, all_108_0) |  ? [v2: $i] :
% 16.54/3.04  |           (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) = v2 & apply(v2, all_79_1) = v1
% 16.54/3.04  |             & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | ALPHA: (58) implies:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (59)  relation_dom(all_43_2) = all_108_0
% 16.54/3.04  |   (60)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) =
% 16.54/3.04  |             v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) |  ~
% 16.54/3.04  |           in(all_79_1, all_108_0) |  ? [v2: $i] : (apply(v1, all_79_1) = v2 &
% 16.54/3.04  |             apply(v0, all_79_0) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (60) with all_43_4, all_43_1, simplifying with
% 16.54/3.04  |              (11), (13), (17), (20) gives:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (61)   ~ in(all_79_1, all_108_0) |  ? [v0: $i] : (apply(all_43_1, all_79_1)
% 16.54/3.04  |           = v0 & apply(all_43_4, all_79_0) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | DELTA: instantiating (53) with fresh symbol all_111_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (62)  relation_dom(all_43_2) = all_111_0 & $i(all_111_0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 16.54/3.04  |         [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) = v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 16.54/3.04  |            ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) |  ~ in(all_79_2, all_111_0) |  ?
% 16.54/3.04  |           [v2: $i] : (apply(v1, all_79_2) = v2 & apply(v0, all_79_0) = v2 &
% 16.54/3.04  |             $i(v2))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (apply(v0, all_79_0) =
% 16.54/3.04  |             v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) |  ~
% 16.54/3.04  |           in(all_79_2, all_111_0) |  ? [v2: $i] :
% 16.54/3.04  |           (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) = v2 & apply(v2, all_79_2) = v1
% 16.54/3.04  |             & $i(v2) & $i(v1)))
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | ALPHA: (62) implies:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (63)  relation_dom(all_43_2) = all_111_0
% 16.54/3.04  |   (64)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (relation_composition(all_43_2, v0) =
% 16.54/3.04  |             v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ relation(v0) |  ~ function(v0) |  ~
% 16.54/3.04  |           in(all_79_2, all_111_0) |  ? [v2: $i] : (apply(v1, all_79_2) = v2 &
% 16.54/3.04  |             apply(v0, all_79_0) = v2 & $i(v2)))
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (64) with all_43_4, all_43_1, simplifying with
% 16.54/3.04  |              (11), (13), (17), (20) gives:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (65)   ~ in(all_79_2, all_111_0) |  ? [v0: $i] : (apply(all_43_1, all_79_2)
% 16.54/3.04  |           = v0 & apply(all_43_4, all_79_0) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_55_0, all_111_0, all_43_2, simplifying
% 16.54/3.04  |              with (26), (63) gives:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (66)  all_111_0 = all_55_0
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_108_0, all_111_0, all_43_2,
% 16.54/3.04  |              simplifying with (59), (63) gives:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (67)  all_111_0 = all_108_0
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_55_0, all_105_0, all_43_1, simplifying
% 16.54/3.04  |              with (34), (57) gives:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (68)  all_105_0 = all_55_0
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | COMBINE_EQS: (66), (67) imply:
% 16.54/3.04  |   (69)  all_108_0 = all_55_0
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.04  | BETA: splitting (61) gives:
% 16.54/3.04  | 
% 16.54/3.05  | Case 1:
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | |   (70)   ~ in(all_79_1, all_108_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | REDUCE: (69), (70) imply:
% 16.54/3.05  | |   (71)   ~ in(all_79_1, all_55_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | PRED_UNIFY: (45), (71) imply:
% 16.54/3.05  | |   (72)  $false
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | CLOSE: (72) is inconsistent.
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | Case 2:
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | |   (73)  in(all_79_1, all_108_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | |   (74)   ? [v0: $i] : (apply(all_43_1, all_79_1) = v0 & apply(all_43_4,
% 16.54/3.05  | |             all_79_0) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | DELTA: instantiating (74) with fresh symbol all_122_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.05  | |   (75)  apply(all_43_1, all_79_1) = all_122_0 & apply(all_43_4, all_79_0) =
% 16.54/3.05  | |         all_122_0 & $i(all_122_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | ALPHA: (75) implies:
% 16.54/3.05  | |   (76)  apply(all_43_4, all_79_0) = all_122_0
% 16.54/3.05  | |   (77)  apply(all_43_1, all_79_1) = all_122_0
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | BETA: splitting (65) gives:
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | Case 1:
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (78)   ~ in(all_79_2, all_111_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | REDUCE: (66), (78) imply:
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (79)   ~ in(all_79_2, all_55_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | PRED_UNIFY: (44), (79) imply:
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (80)  $false
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | CLOSE: (80) is inconsistent.
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | Case 2:
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (81)  in(all_79_2, all_111_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (82)   ? [v0: $i] : (apply(all_43_1, all_79_2) = v0 & apply(all_43_4,
% 16.54/3.05  | | |             all_79_0) = v0 & $i(v0))
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | DELTA: instantiating (82) with fresh symbol all_127_0 gives:
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (83)  apply(all_43_1, all_79_2) = all_127_0 & apply(all_43_4, all_79_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | | |         = all_127_0 & $i(all_127_0)
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | ALPHA: (83) implies:
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (84)  apply(all_43_4, all_79_0) = all_127_0
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (85)  apply(all_43_1, all_79_2) = all_127_0
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_122_0, all_127_0, all_79_0,
% 16.54/3.05  | | |              all_43_4, simplifying with (76), (84) gives:
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (86)  all_127_0 = all_122_0
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | REDUCE: (85), (86) imply:
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (87)  apply(all_43_1, all_79_2) = all_122_0
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_43_1, all_55_0, all_79_2,
% 16.54/3.05  | | |              all_79_1, all_122_0, simplifying with (15), (22), (23), (34),
% 16.54/3.05  | | |              (35), (44), (45), (46), (47), (77), (87) gives:
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (88)  all_79_1 = all_79_2
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | REDUCE: (43), (88) imply:
% 16.54/3.05  | | |   (89)  $false
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | | CLOSE: (89) is inconsistent.
% 16.54/3.05  | | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | | End of split
% 16.54/3.05  | | 
% 16.54/3.05  | End of split
% 16.54/3.05  | 
% 16.54/3.05  End of proof
% 16.54/3.05  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 16.54/3.05  
% 16.54/3.05  2459ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------