TSTP Solution File: SEU014+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU014+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 182 ( 26 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 23 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 237 ( 95 ~; 98 |; 27 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 16 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 0 sgn 28 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t47_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( ( one_to_one(relation_composition(X2,X1))
& subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_dom(X1)) )
=> one_to_one(X2) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t47_funct_1) ).
fof(t46_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( relation(X1)
=> ! [X2] :
( relation(X2)
=> ( subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
=> relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_dom(X1) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t46_relat_1) ).
fof(t23_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X2))
=> apply(relation_composition(X2,X3),X1) = apply(X3,apply(X2,X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).
fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
<=> ! [X2,X3] :
( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
& in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3) )
=> X2 = X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',d8_funct_1) ).
fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1)
& relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
& function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',fc1_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( ( one_to_one(relation_composition(X2,X1))
& subset(relation_rng(X2),relation_dom(X1)) )
=> one_to_one(X2) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t47_funct_1]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ subset(relation_rng(X3),relation_dom(X4))
| relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X4)) = relation_dom(X3) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t46_relat_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk12_0)
& function(esk12_0)
& relation(esk13_0)
& function(esk13_0)
& one_to_one(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
& subset(relation_rng(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk12_0))
& ~ one_to_one(esk13_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X5))
| apply(relation_composition(X5,X6),X4) = apply(X6,apply(X5,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t23_funct_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ one_to_one(X4)
| ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X4))
| ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X4))
| apply(X4,X5) != apply(X4,X6)
| X5 = X6
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( in(esk1_1(X4),relation_dom(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( in(esk2_1(X4),relation_dom(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( apply(X4,esk1_1(X4)) = apply(X4,esk2_1(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( esk1_1(X4) != esk2_1(X4)
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = relation_dom(X1)
| ~ subset(relation_rng(X1),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
subset(relation_rng(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk12_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk12_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk13_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( one_to_one(X1)
| apply(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( one_to_one(X1)
| in(esk2_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( X2 = X3
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(X1,X2) != apply(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
relation_dom(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)) = relation_dom(esk13_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( apply(X1,apply(X2,esk1_1(X2))) = apply(relation_composition(X2,X1),esk2_1(X2))
| one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( one_to_one(X1)
| in(esk1_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = X2
| apply(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0),X1) != apply(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0),X2)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(esk13_0))
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk13_0)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),esk2_1(X1)) = apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),esk1_1(X1))
| one_to_one(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
function(esk12_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
function(esk13_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ one_to_one(esk13_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_1(esk13_0) = X1
| apply(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0),esk1_1(esk13_0)) != apply(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0),X1)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ in(esk2_1(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk13_0))
| ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk13_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_1(esk13_0) = esk1_1(esk13_0)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ in(esk2_1(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk13_0))
| ~ in(esk1_1(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk13_0)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_1(esk13_0) = esk1_1(esk13_0)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ in(esk1_1(esk13_0),relation_dom(esk13_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_17]),c_0_14]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( one_to_one(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( esk2_1(esk13_0) = esk1_1(esk13_0)
| ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_22]),c_0_14]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).
fof(c_0_33,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( relation(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( function(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
( ~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0))
| ~ function(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_14]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( function(relation_composition(X2,X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
~ relation(relation_composition(esk13_0,esk12_0)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_14]),c_0_13]),c_0_26]),c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SEU014+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 19 00:38:14 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 40
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 27
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 19
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 16
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 16
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 33
% 0.25/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 37
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses : 62
% 0.25/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 62
% 0.25/1.42 # Processed clauses : 559
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.25/1.42 # ...subsumed : 368
% 0.25/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 186
% 0.25/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 16
% 0.25/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 16
% 0.25/1.42 # Generated clauses : 1262
% 0.25/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1159
% 0.25/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 344
% 0.25/1.42 # Paramodulations : 1256
% 0.25/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 154
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 0.25/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 11
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 116
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 461
% 0.25/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 3183
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 32
% 0.25/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15807
% 0.25/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8843
% 0.25/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 515
% 0.25/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 367
% 0.25/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 7
% 0.25/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 6
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 21136
% 0.25/1.42
% 0.25/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.42 # User time : 0.048 s
% 0.25/1.42 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Total time : 0.054 s
% 0.25/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3760 pages
% 0.25/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.42 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------