TSTP Solution File: SEU013+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SEU013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 09:16:24 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.33s 14.51s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 259 ( 21 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 23 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 367 ( 152 ~; 166 |; 32 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 15 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 79 ( 0 sgn 30 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d8_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ( one_to_one(X1)
<=> ! [X2,X3] :
( ( in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
& in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
& apply(X1,X2) = apply(X1,X3) )
=> X2 = X3 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d8_funct_1) ).
fof(t22_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
=> apply(relation_composition(X3,X2),X1) = apply(X2,apply(X3,X1)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t22_funct_1) ).
fof(fc1_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1)
& relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
& function(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc1_funct_1) ).
fof(dt_k5_relat_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X1)
& relation(X2) )
=> relation(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',dt_k5_relat_1) ).
fof(t21_funct_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ! [X3] :
( ( relation(X3)
& function(X3) )
=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(relation_composition(X3,X2)))
<=> ( in(X1,relation_dom(X3))
& in(apply(X3,X1),relation_dom(X2)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t21_funct_1) ).
fof(t46_funct_1,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( ( one_to_one(X1)
& one_to_one(X2) )
=> one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t46_funct_1) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( ~ one_to_one(X4)
| ~ in(X5,relation_dom(X4))
| ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X4))
| apply(X4,X5) != apply(X4,X6)
| X5 = X6
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( in(esk1_1(X4),relation_dom(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( in(esk2_1(X4),relation_dom(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( apply(X4,esk1_1(X4)) = apply(X4,esk2_1(X4))
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( esk1_1(X4) != esk2_1(X4)
| one_to_one(X4)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d8_funct_1])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5)
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X6,X5)))
| apply(relation_composition(X6,X5),X4) = apply(X5,apply(X6,X4)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t22_funct_1])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ( relation(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) )
& ( function(relation_composition(X3,X4))
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| ~ function(X4) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_funct_1])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( ~ relation(X3)
| ~ relation(X4)
| relation(relation_composition(X3,X4)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k5_relat_1])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( ( in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( in(apply(X6,X4),relation_dom(X5))
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) )
& ( ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X6))
| ~ in(apply(X6,X4),relation_dom(X5))
| in(X4,relation_dom(relation_composition(X6,X5)))
| ~ relation(X6)
| ~ function(X6)
| ~ relation(X5)
| ~ function(X5) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t21_funct_1])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( one_to_one(X1)
| apply(X1,esk1_1(X1)) = apply(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( one_to_one(X1)
| in(esk2_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( function(relation_composition(X2,X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( relation(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( in(apply(X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( one_to_one(X1)
| in(esk1_1(X1),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( in(X3,relation_dom(X2))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),esk1_1(relation_composition(X1,X2))) = apply(X2,apply(X1,esk2_1(relation_composition(X1,X2))))
| one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( in(X3,relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1)))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ in(apply(X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| in(apply(X1,esk1_1(relation_composition(X1,X2))),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| in(esk1_1(relation_composition(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X2 = X3
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(X1,X2) != apply(X1,X3)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ one_to_one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( apply(X1,apply(X2,esk2_1(relation_composition(X2,X1)))) = apply(X1,apply(X2,esk1_1(relation_composition(X2,X1))))
| one_to_one(relation_composition(X2,X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ in(esk1_1(relation_composition(X2,X1)),relation_dom(relation_composition(X2,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| in(esk1_1(relation_composition(X1,X2)),relation_dom(relation_composition(X1,X2)))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| in(apply(X1,esk2_1(relation_composition(X1,X2))),relation_dom(X2))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( apply(X1,esk2_1(relation_composition(X1,X2))) = X3
| one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| apply(X2,apply(X1,esk1_1(relation_composition(X1,X2)))) != apply(X2,X3)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X2)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( apply(X1,esk2_1(relation_composition(X1,X2))) = apply(X1,esk1_1(relation_composition(X1,X2)))
| one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ function(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| in(esk2_1(relation_composition(X1,X2)),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( ( relation(X1)
& function(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( relation(X2)
& function(X2) )
=> ( ( one_to_one(X1)
& one_to_one(X2) )
=> one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2)) ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t46_funct_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( esk2_1(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = X3
| one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| apply(X1,esk1_1(relation_composition(X1,X2))) != apply(X1,X3)
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).
fof(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( relation(esk12_0)
& function(esk12_0)
& relation(esk13_0)
& function(esk13_0)
& one_to_one(esk12_0)
& one_to_one(esk13_0)
& ~ one_to_one(relation_composition(esk12_0,esk13_0)) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_30])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( one_to_one(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| esk1_1(X1) != esk2_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( esk2_1(relation_composition(X1,X2)) = esk1_1(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ one_to_one(relation_composition(esk12_0,esk13_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( one_to_one(relation_composition(X1,X2))
| ~ one_to_one(X1)
| ~ one_to_one(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(esk12_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
one_to_one(esk13_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk12_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk13_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
function(esk12_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
function(esk13_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_40]),c_0_41]),c_0_42])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SEU013+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 23:40:43 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.33/14.51 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.33/14.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.33/14.51
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof found!
% 0.33/14.51 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.33/14.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object total steps : 44
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object clause steps : 31
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object conjectures : 11
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object clause conjectures : 8
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object initial clauses used : 18
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object generating inferences : 13
% 0.33/14.51 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 26
% 0.33/14.51 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.33/14.51 # Parsed axioms : 35
% 0.33/14.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.33/14.51 # Initial clauses : 61
% 0.33/14.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.33/14.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 61
% 0.33/14.51 # Processed clauses : 42592
% 0.33/14.51 # ...of these trivial : 31
% 0.33/14.51 # ...subsumed : 31046
% 0.33/14.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 11515
% 0.33/14.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.33/14.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 295441
% 0.33/14.51 # Backward-subsumed : 199
% 0.33/14.51 # Backward-rewritten : 2216
% 0.33/14.51 # Generated clauses : 507627
% 0.33/14.51 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 455009
% 0.33/14.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 78425
% 0.33/14.51 # Paramodulations : 501852
% 0.33/14.51 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/14.51 # Equation resolutions : 5
% 0.33/14.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 5822
% 0.33/14.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1698
% 0.33/14.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/14.51 # Negative unit clauses : 847
% 0.33/14.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 3277
% 0.33/14.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56638
% 0.33/14.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 413357
% 0.33/14.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/14.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 2416
% 0.33/14.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19635038
% 0.33/14.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2971605
% 0.33/14.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 115025
% 0.33/14.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3884071
% 0.33/14.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/14.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2213
% 0.33/14.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 1667
% 0.33/14.51 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/14.51 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/14.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 19567376
% 0.33/14.51
% 0.33/14.51 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/14.51 # User time : 13.673 s
% 0.33/14.51 # System time : 0.151 s
% 0.33/14.51 # Total time : 13.824 s
% 0.33/14.51 # Maximum resident set size: 154904 pages
% 0.33/23.41 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/23.42 eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.33/23.42
% 0.33/23.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.44 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.45 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.33/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------