TSTP Solution File: SEU012+1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : SEU012+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 03:04:21 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 145.56s 20.19s
% Output : CNFRefutation 145.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 19
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 70 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 354 ( 138 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 16 ( 5 avg)
% Number of connectives : 453 ( 169 ~; 166 |; 91 &)
% ( 9 <=>; 18 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 6 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 134 ( 0 sgn 87 !; 26 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ! [X1] :
( relation_rng(X0) = X1
<=> ! [X2] :
( in(X2,X1)
<=> ? [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) = X2
& in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).
fof(f30,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ! [X2] :
( ( function(X2)
& relation(X2) )
=> ( in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
=> apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t23_funct_1) ).
fof(f32,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( in(X2,X0)
=> apply(X1,X2) = X2 )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t34_funct_1) ).
fof(f34,conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( ( relation_composition(X0,X1) = X0
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1) )
=> identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = X1 ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t44_funct_1) ).
fof(f35,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0] :
( ( function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ! [X1] :
( ( function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( ( relation_composition(X0,X1) = X0
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1) )
=> identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = X1 ) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( relation_rng(X0) = X1
<=> ! [X2] :
( in(X2,X1)
<=> ? [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) = X2
& in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f49,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( relation_rng(X0) = X1
<=> ! [X2] :
( in(X2,X1)
<=> ? [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) = X2
& in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f48]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).
fof(f67,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f70,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).
fof(f71,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
<=> ( ! [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f70]) ).
fof(f73,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) != X1
& relation_composition(X0,X1) = X0
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1)
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
& function(X0)
& relation(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).
fof(f74,plain,
? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) != X1
& relation_composition(X0,X1) = X0
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1)
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
& function(X0)
& relation(X0) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f73]) ).
fof(f81,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( relation_rng(X0) = X1
| ? [X2] :
( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) != X2
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ in(X2,X1) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) = X2
& in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| in(X2,X1) ) ) )
& ( ! [X2] :
( ( in(X2,X1)
| ! [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) != X2
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ? [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) = X2
& in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ in(X2,X1) ) )
| relation_rng(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).
fof(f82,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( relation_rng(X0) = X1
| ? [X2] :
( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) != X2
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ in(X2,X1) )
& ( ? [X4] :
( apply(X0,X4) = X2
& in(X4,relation_dom(X0)) )
| in(X2,X1) ) ) )
& ( ! [X5] :
( ( in(X5,X1)
| ! [X6] :
( apply(X0,X6) != X5
| ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ? [X7] :
( apply(X0,X7) = X5
& in(X7,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ in(X5,X1) ) )
| relation_rng(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f81]) ).
fof(f83,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) != X2
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ in(X2,X1) )
& ( ? [X4] :
( apply(X0,X4) = X2
& in(X4,relation_dom(X0)) )
| in(X2,X1) ) )
=> ( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) != sK0(X0,X1)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
& ( ? [X4] :
( apply(X0,X4) = sK0(X0,X1)
& in(X4,relation_dom(X0)) )
| in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f84,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X4] :
( apply(X0,X4) = sK0(X0,X1)
& in(X4,relation_dom(X0)) )
=> ( sK0(X0,X1) = apply(X0,sK1(X0,X1))
& in(sK1(X0,X1),relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f85,plain,
! [X0,X5] :
( ? [X7] :
( apply(X0,X7) = X5
& in(X7,relation_dom(X0)) )
=> ( apply(X0,sK2(X0,X5)) = X5
& in(sK2(X0,X5),relation_dom(X0)) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f86,plain,
! [X0] :
( ! [X1] :
( ( relation_rng(X0) = X1
| ( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X0,X3) != sK0(X0,X1)
| ~ in(X3,relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
& ( ( sK0(X0,X1) = apply(X0,sK1(X0,X1))
& in(sK1(X0,X1),relation_dom(X0)) )
| in(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ) ) )
& ( ! [X5] :
( ( in(X5,X1)
| ! [X6] :
( apply(X0,X6) != X5
| ~ in(X6,relation_dom(X0)) ) )
& ( ( apply(X0,sK2(X0,X5)) = X5
& in(sK2(X0,X5),relation_dom(X0)) )
| ~ in(X5,X1) ) )
| relation_rng(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f82,f85,f84,f83]) ).
fof(f105,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| ? [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) != X2
& in(X2,X0) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
& ( ( ! [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
| identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).
fof(f106,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| ? [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) != X2
& in(X2,X0) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
& ( ( ! [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) = X2
| ~ in(X2,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
| identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f105]) ).
fof(f107,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| ? [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) != X2
& in(X2,X0) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
& ( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X1,X3) = X3
| ~ in(X3,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
| identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f106]) ).
fof(f108,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2] :
( apply(X1,X2) != X2
& in(X2,X0) )
=> ( sK12(X0,X1) != apply(X1,sK12(X0,X1))
& in(sK12(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f109,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| ( sK12(X0,X1) != apply(X1,sK12(X0,X1))
& in(sK12(X0,X1),X0) )
| relation_dom(X1) != X0 )
& ( ( ! [X3] :
( apply(X1,X3) = X3
| ~ in(X3,X0) )
& relation_dom(X1) = X0 )
| identity_relation(X0) != X1 ) )
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK12])],[f107,f108]) ).
fof(f110,plain,
( ? [X0] :
( ? [X1] :
( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) != X1
& relation_composition(X0,X1) = X0
& relation_rng(X0) = relation_dom(X1)
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
& function(X0)
& relation(X0) )
=> ( ? [X1] :
( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) != X1
& sK13 = relation_composition(sK13,X1)
& relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(sK13)
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
& function(sK13)
& relation(sK13) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f111,plain,
( ? [X1] :
( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) != X1
& sK13 = relation_composition(sK13,X1)
& relation_dom(X1) = relation_rng(sK13)
& function(X1)
& relation(X1) )
=> ( sK14 != identity_relation(relation_dom(sK14))
& sK13 = relation_composition(sK13,sK14)
& relation_rng(sK13) = relation_dom(sK14)
& function(sK14)
& relation(sK14) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f112,plain,
( sK14 != identity_relation(relation_dom(sK14))
& sK13 = relation_composition(sK13,sK14)
& relation_rng(sK13) = relation_dom(sK14)
& function(sK14)
& relation(sK14)
& function(sK13)
& relation(sK13) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK13,sK14])],[f74,f111,f110]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
! [X0,X1,X5] :
( in(sK2(X0,X5),relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(X5,X1)
| relation_rng(X0) != X1
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).
fof(f117,plain,
! [X0,X1,X5] :
( apply(X0,sK2(X0,X5)) = X5
| ~ in(X5,X1)
| relation_rng(X0) != X1
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f86]) ).
fof(f160,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0))
| ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X2)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).
fof(f164,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| in(sK12(X0,X1),X0)
| relation_dom(X1) != X0
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).
fof(f165,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( identity_relation(X0) = X1
| sK12(X0,X1) != apply(X1,sK12(X0,X1))
| relation_dom(X1) != X0
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f109]) ).
fof(f167,plain,
relation(sK13),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f168,plain,
function(sK13),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f169,plain,
relation(sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f170,plain,
function(sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f171,plain,
relation_rng(sK13) = relation_dom(sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f172,plain,
sK13 = relation_composition(sK13,sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f173,plain,
sK14 != identity_relation(relation_dom(sK14)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f112]) ).
fof(f181,plain,
! [X0,X5] :
( apply(X0,sK2(X0,X5)) = X5
| ~ in(X5,relation_rng(X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f117]) ).
fof(f182,plain,
! [X0,X5] :
( in(sK2(X0,X5),relation_dom(X0))
| ~ in(X5,relation_rng(X0))
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f183,plain,
! [X1] :
( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = X1
| sK12(relation_dom(X1),X1) != apply(X1,sK12(relation_dom(X1),X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f165]) ).
fof(f184,plain,
! [X1] :
( identity_relation(relation_dom(X1)) = X1
| in(sK12(relation_dom(X1),X1),relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1) ),
inference(equality_resolution,[],[f164]) ).
cnf(c_56,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(X1,sK2(X1,X0)) = X0 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f181]) ).
cnf(c_57,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| in(sK2(X1,X0),relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f182]) ).
cnf(c_96,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X0) = apply(X2,apply(X1,X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f160]) ).
cnf(c_98,plain,
( apply(X0,sK12(relation_dom(X0),X0)) != sK12(relation_dom(X0),X0)
| ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) = X0 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f183]) ).
cnf(c_99,plain,
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| identity_relation(relation_dom(X0)) = X0
| in(sK12(relation_dom(X0),X0),relation_dom(X0)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f184]) ).
cnf(c_103,negated_conjecture,
identity_relation(relation_dom(sK14)) != sK14,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f173]) ).
cnf(c_104,negated_conjecture,
relation_composition(sK13,sK14) = sK13,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f172]) ).
cnf(c_105,negated_conjecture,
relation_rng(sK13) = relation_dom(sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f171]) ).
cnf(c_106,negated_conjecture,
function(sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f170]) ).
cnf(c_107,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK14),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f169]) ).
cnf(c_108,negated_conjecture,
function(sK13),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f168]) ).
cnf(c_109,negated_conjecture,
relation(sK13),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).
cnf(c_10515,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sK14))
| ~ function(sK13)
| ~ relation(sK13)
| apply(sK13,sK2(sK13,X0)) = X0 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_56]) ).
cnf(c_10516,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sK14))
| apply(sK13,sK2(sK13,X0)) = X0 ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10515,c_109,c_108]) ).
cnf(c_10526,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_rng(X1))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ function(X2)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ relation(X2)
| apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),sK2(X1,X0)) = apply(X2,apply(X1,sK2(X1,X0))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_57,c_96]) ).
cnf(c_10550,plain,
( ~ function(sK14)
| ~ relation(sK14)
| apply(sK13,sK2(sK13,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14))) = sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14)
| identity_relation(relation_dom(sK14)) = sK14 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_10516]) ).
cnf(c_10553,plain,
apply(sK13,sK2(sK13,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14))) = sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10550,c_103,c_107,c_106]) ).
cnf(c_12109,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sK14))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(sK13)
| ~ relation(sK13)
| apply(relation_composition(sK13,X1),sK2(sK13,X0)) = apply(X1,apply(sK13,sK2(sK13,X0))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_105,c_10526]) ).
cnf(c_12111,plain,
( ~ in(X0,relation_dom(sK14))
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ relation(X1)
| apply(relation_composition(sK13,X1),sK2(sK13,X0)) = apply(X1,apply(sK13,sK2(sK13,X0))) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12109,c_109,c_108]) ).
cnf(c_12116,plain,
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(sK14)
| ~ relation(sK14)
| apply(relation_composition(sK13,X0),sK2(sK13,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14))) = apply(X0,apply(sK13,sK2(sK13,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14))))
| identity_relation(relation_dom(sK14)) = sK14 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_99,c_12111]) ).
cnf(c_12139,plain,
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| ~ function(sK14)
| ~ relation(sK14)
| apply(relation_composition(sK13,X0),sK2(sK13,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14))) = apply(X0,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14))
| identity_relation(relation_dom(sK14)) = sK14 ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_12116,c_10553]) ).
cnf(c_12140,plain,
( ~ function(X0)
| ~ relation(X0)
| apply(relation_composition(sK13,X0),sK2(sK13,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14))) = apply(X0,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14)) ),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12139,c_103,c_107,c_106]) ).
cnf(c_12146,plain,
( ~ relation(sK14)
| apply(relation_composition(sK13,sK14),sK2(sK13,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14))) = apply(sK14,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_106,c_12140]) ).
cnf(c_12154,plain,
( ~ relation(sK14)
| apply(sK14,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14)) = sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_12146,c_104,c_10553]) ).
cnf(c_12155,plain,
apply(sK14,sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14)) = sK12(relation_dom(sK14),sK14),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12154,c_107]) ).
cnf(c_12195,plain,
( ~ function(sK14)
| ~ relation(sK14)
| identity_relation(relation_dom(sK14)) = sK14 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_12155,c_98]) ).
cnf(c_12196,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12195,c_103,c_107,c_106]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10 % Problem : SEU012+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.31 % DateTime : Thu May 2 18:11:35 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 145.56/20.19 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 145.56/20.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 ------ iProver source info
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 145.56/20.19 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 145.56/20.19 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Parsing...
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Proving...
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Problem Properties
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 clauses 60
% 145.56/20.19 conjectures 7
% 145.56/20.19 EPR 23
% 145.56/20.19 Horn 55
% 145.56/20.19 unary 26
% 145.56/20.19 binary 13
% 145.56/20.19 lits 132
% 145.56/20.19 lits eq 17
% 145.56/20.19 fd_pure 0
% 145.56/20.19 fd_pseudo 0
% 145.56/20.19 fd_cond 1
% 145.56/20.19 fd_pseudo_cond 4
% 145.56/20.19 AC symbols 0
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 ------
% 145.56/20.19 Current options:
% 145.56/20.19 ------
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 ------ Proving...
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 145.56/20.19
% 145.56/20.19
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------