TSTP Solution File: SEU012+1 by SRASS---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SRASS---0.1
% Problem : SEU012+1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : SRASS -q2 -a 0 10 10 10 -i3 -n60 %s
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Dec 30 00:35:45 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 106.12s
% Output : Solution 127.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Reading problem from /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11788/SEU012+1.tptp
% Adding relevance values
% Extracting the conjecture
% Sorting axioms by relevance
% Looking for THM ...
% not found
% Adding ~C to TBU ... ~t44_funct_1:
% ---- Iteration 1 (0 axioms selected)
% Looking for TBU SAT ...
% yes
% Looking for TBU model ...
% not found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... dt_k5_relat_1:
% CSA axiom dt_k5_relat_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... dt_k6_relat_1:
% CSA axiom dt_k6_relat_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... fc1_funct_1:
% CSA axiom fc1_funct_1 found
% ---- Iteration 2 (3 axioms selected)
% Looking for TBU SAT ...
% yes
% Looking for TBU model ... not found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... fc2_funct_1:
% CSA axiom fc2_funct_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... rc1_funct_1:
% fc6_relat_1:
% CSA axiom fc6_relat_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... fc8_relat_1:
% CSA axiom fc8_relat_1 found
% ---- Iteration 3 (6 axioms selected)
% Looking for TBU SAT ...
% yes
% Looking for TBU model ...
% not found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... rc1_funct_1:
% fc10_relat_1:
% CSA axiom fc10_relat_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... fc5_relat_1:
% CSA axiom fc5_relat_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... fc7_relat_1: CSA axiom fc7_relat_1 found
% ---- Iteration 4 (9 axioms selected)
% Looking for TBU SAT ...
% yes
% Looking for TBU model ...
% not found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... rc1_funct_1:
% fc9_relat_1:
% CSA axiom fc9_relat_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... d5_funct_1:
% CSA axiom d5_funct_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... t23_funct_1:
% CSA axiom t23_funct_1 found
% ---- Iteration 5 (12 axioms selected)
% Looking for TBU SAT ...
% yes
% Looking for TBU model ...
% not found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... rc1_funct_1:
% t34_funct_1:
% CSA axiom t34_funct_1 found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... t8_boole:
% CSA axiom t8_boole found
% Looking for CSA axiom ... cc1_funct_1:
% CSA axiom cc1_funct_1 found
% ---- Iteration 6 (15 axioms selected)
% Looking for TBU SAT ...
% no
% Looking for TBU UNS ...
% yes - theorem proved
% ---- Selection completed
% Selected axioms are ... :cc1_funct_1:t8_boole:t34_funct_1:t23_funct_1:d5_funct_1:fc9_relat_1:fc7_relat_1:fc5_relat_1:fc10_relat_1:fc8_relat_1:fc6_relat_1:fc2_funct_1:fc1_funct_1:dt_k6_relat_1:dt_k5_relat_1 (15)
% Unselected axioms are ... :rc1_funct_1:cc1_relat_1:rc1_relat_1:rc2_relat_1:antisymmetry_r2_hidden:fc1_xboole_0:rc1_xboole_0:rc2_xboole_0:t6_boole:existence_m1_subset_1:rc3_relat_1:t7_boole:fc4_relat_1:t1_subset:fc12_relat_1:t4_subset:reflexivity_r1_tarski:t2_subset:t5_subset:fc1_subset_1:t3_subset:rc1_subset_1:rc2_subset_1 (23)
% SZS status THM for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11788/SEU012+1.tptp
% Looking for THM ...
% found
% SZS output start Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11788/SEU012+1.tptp
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% TreeLimitedRun: /home/graph/tptp/Systems/EP---1.2/eproof --print-statistics -xAuto -tAuto --cpu-limit=600 --proof-time-unlimited --memory-limit=Auto --tstp-in --tstp-out /tmp/SRASS.s.p
% TreeLimitedRun: CPU time limit is 600s
% TreeLimitedRun: WC time limit is 1200s
% TreeLimitedRun: PID is 15048
% TreeLimitedRun: ----------------------------------------------------------
% PrfWatch: 0.00 CPU 0.02 WC
% PrfWatch: 1.94 CPU 2.03 WC
% PrfWatch: 3.93 CPU 4.03 WC
% PrfWatch: 5.92 CPU 6.04 WC
% PrfWatch: 7.92 CPU 8.04 WC
% PrfWatch: 9.90 CPU 10.05 WC
% PrfWatch: 11.90 CPU 12.05 WC
% PrfWatch: 13.88 CPU 14.06 WC
% # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% PrfWatch: 15.88 CPU 16.06 WC
% PrfWatch: 17.87 CPU 18.07 WC
% PrfWatch: 19.87 CPU 20.07 WC
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% fof(3, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))=>(X2=identity_relation(X1)<=>(relation_dom(X2)=X1&![X3]:(in(X3,X1)=>apply(X2,X3)=X3)))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t34_funct_1)).
% fof(4, axiom,![X1]:![X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))=>![X3]:((relation(X3)&function(X3))=>(in(X1,relation_dom(X2))=>apply(relation_composition(X2,X3),X1)=apply(X3,apply(X2,X1))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t23_funct_1)).
% fof(5, axiom,![X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))=>![X2]:(X2=relation_rng(X1)<=>![X3]:(in(X3,X2)<=>?[X4]:(in(X4,relation_dom(X1))&X3=apply(X1,X4))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', d5_funct_1)).
% fof(16, conjecture,![X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))=>![X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))=>((relation_rng(X1)=relation_dom(X2)&relation_composition(X1,X2)=X1)=>X2=identity_relation(relation_dom(X2))))),file('/tmp/SRASS.s.p', t44_funct_1)).
% fof(17, negated_conjecture,~(![X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))=>![X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))=>((relation_rng(X1)=relation_dom(X2)&relation_composition(X1,X2)=X1)=>X2=identity_relation(relation_dom(X2)))))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[16])).
% fof(26, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(relation(X2))|~(function(X2)))|((~(X2=identity_relation(X1))|(relation_dom(X2)=X1&![X3]:(~(in(X3,X1))|apply(X2,X3)=X3)))&((~(relation_dom(X2)=X1)|?[X3]:(in(X3,X1)&~(apply(X2,X3)=X3)))|X2=identity_relation(X1)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[3])).
% fof(27, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))|((~(X5=identity_relation(X4))|(relation_dom(X5)=X4&![X6]:(~(in(X6,X4))|apply(X5,X6)=X6)))&((~(relation_dom(X5)=X4)|?[X7]:(in(X7,X4)&~(apply(X5,X7)=X7)))|X5=identity_relation(X4)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[26])).
% fof(28, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))|((~(X5=identity_relation(X4))|(relation_dom(X5)=X4&![X6]:(~(in(X6,X4))|apply(X5,X6)=X6)))&((~(relation_dom(X5)=X4)|(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(apply(X5,esk1_2(X4,X5))=esk1_2(X4,X5))))|X5=identity_relation(X4)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[27])).
% fof(29, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((((~(in(X6,X4))|apply(X5,X6)=X6)&relation_dom(X5)=X4)|~(X5=identity_relation(X4)))&((~(relation_dom(X5)=X4)|(in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)&~(apply(X5,esk1_2(X4,X5))=esk1_2(X4,X5))))|X5=identity_relation(X4)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[28])).
% fof(30, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((((~(in(X6,X4))|apply(X5,X6)=X6)|~(X5=identity_relation(X4)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))&((relation_dom(X5)=X4|~(X5=identity_relation(X4)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))))&((((in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)|~(relation_dom(X5)=X4))|X5=identity_relation(X4))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))&(((~(apply(X5,esk1_2(X4,X5))=esk1_2(X4,X5))|~(relation_dom(X5)=X4))|X5=identity_relation(X4))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[29])).
% cnf(31,plain,(X1=identity_relation(X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)|relation_dom(X1)!=X2|apply(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1))!=esk1_2(X2,X1)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30])).
% cnf(32,plain,(X1=identity_relation(X2)|in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X2)|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)|relation_dom(X1)!=X2),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[30])).
% fof(35, plain,![X1]:![X2]:((~(relation(X2))|~(function(X2)))|![X3]:((~(relation(X3))|~(function(X3)))|(~(in(X1,relation_dom(X2)))|apply(relation_composition(X2,X3),X1)=apply(X3,apply(X2,X1))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[4])).
% fof(36, plain,![X4]:![X5]:((~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))|![X6]:((~(relation(X6))|~(function(X6)))|(~(in(X4,relation_dom(X5)))|apply(relation_composition(X5,X6),X4)=apply(X6,apply(X5,X4))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[35])).
% fof(37, plain,![X4]:![X5]:![X6]:(((~(relation(X6))|~(function(X6)))|(~(in(X4,relation_dom(X5)))|apply(relation_composition(X5,X6),X4)=apply(X6,apply(X5,X4))))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[36])).
% cnf(38,plain,(apply(relation_composition(X1,X2),X3)=apply(X2,apply(X1,X3))|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)|~in(X3,relation_dom(X1))|~function(X2)|~relation(X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[37])).
% fof(39, plain,![X1]:((~(relation(X1))|~(function(X1)))|![X2]:((~(X2=relation_rng(X1))|![X3]:((~(in(X3,X2))|?[X4]:(in(X4,relation_dom(X1))&X3=apply(X1,X4)))&(![X4]:(~(in(X4,relation_dom(X1)))|~(X3=apply(X1,X4)))|in(X3,X2))))&(?[X3]:((~(in(X3,X2))|![X4]:(~(in(X4,relation_dom(X1)))|~(X3=apply(X1,X4))))&(in(X3,X2)|?[X4]:(in(X4,relation_dom(X1))&X3=apply(X1,X4))))|X2=relation_rng(X1)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[5])).
% fof(40, plain,![X5]:((~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))|![X6]:((~(X6=relation_rng(X5))|![X7]:((~(in(X7,X6))|?[X8]:(in(X8,relation_dom(X5))&X7=apply(X5,X8)))&(![X9]:(~(in(X9,relation_dom(X5)))|~(X7=apply(X5,X9)))|in(X7,X6))))&(?[X10]:((~(in(X10,X6))|![X11]:(~(in(X11,relation_dom(X5)))|~(X10=apply(X5,X11))))&(in(X10,X6)|?[X12]:(in(X12,relation_dom(X5))&X10=apply(X5,X12))))|X6=relation_rng(X5)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[39])).
% fof(41, plain,![X5]:((~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))|![X6]:((~(X6=relation_rng(X5))|![X7]:((~(in(X7,X6))|(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X5))&X7=apply(X5,esk2_3(X5,X6,X7))))&(![X9]:(~(in(X9,relation_dom(X5)))|~(X7=apply(X5,X9)))|in(X7,X6))))&(((~(in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6))|![X11]:(~(in(X11,relation_dom(X5)))|~(esk3_2(X5,X6)=apply(X5,X11))))&(in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)|(in(esk4_2(X5,X6),relation_dom(X5))&esk3_2(X5,X6)=apply(X5,esk4_2(X5,X6)))))|X6=relation_rng(X5)))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[40])).
% fof(42, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X11]:((((((~(in(X11,relation_dom(X5)))|~(esk3_2(X5,X6)=apply(X5,X11)))|~(in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)))&(in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)|(in(esk4_2(X5,X6),relation_dom(X5))&esk3_2(X5,X6)=apply(X5,esk4_2(X5,X6)))))|X6=relation_rng(X5))&((((~(in(X9,relation_dom(X5)))|~(X7=apply(X5,X9)))|in(X7,X6))&(~(in(X7,X6))|(in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X5))&X7=apply(X5,esk2_3(X5,X6,X7)))))|~(X6=relation_rng(X5))))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[41])).
% fof(43, plain,![X5]:![X6]:![X7]:![X9]:![X11]:((((((~(in(X11,relation_dom(X5)))|~(esk3_2(X5,X6)=apply(X5,X11)))|~(in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)))|X6=relation_rng(X5))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))&((((in(esk4_2(X5,X6),relation_dom(X5))|in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6))|X6=relation_rng(X5))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))&(((esk3_2(X5,X6)=apply(X5,esk4_2(X5,X6))|in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6))|X6=relation_rng(X5))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))))&(((((~(in(X9,relation_dom(X5)))|~(X7=apply(X5,X9)))|in(X7,X6))|~(X6=relation_rng(X5)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))&((((in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),relation_dom(X5))|~(in(X7,X6)))|~(X6=relation_rng(X5)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))&(((X7=apply(X5,esk2_3(X5,X6,X7))|~(in(X7,X6)))|~(X6=relation_rng(X5)))|(~(relation(X5))|~(function(X5))))))),inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[42])).
% cnf(44,plain,(X3=apply(X1,esk2_3(X1,X2,X3))|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)|X2!=relation_rng(X1)|~in(X3,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[43])).
% cnf(45,plain,(in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))|~function(X1)|~relation(X1)|X2!=relation_rng(X1)|~in(X3,X2)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[43])).
% fof(89, negated_conjecture,?[X1]:((relation(X1)&function(X1))&?[X2]:((relation(X2)&function(X2))&((relation_rng(X1)=relation_dom(X2)&relation_composition(X1,X2)=X1)&~(X2=identity_relation(relation_dom(X2)))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[17])).
% fof(90, negated_conjecture,?[X3]:((relation(X3)&function(X3))&?[X4]:((relation(X4)&function(X4))&((relation_rng(X3)=relation_dom(X4)&relation_composition(X3,X4)=X3)&~(X4=identity_relation(relation_dom(X4)))))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[89])).
% fof(91, negated_conjecture,((relation(esk5_0)&function(esk5_0))&((relation(esk6_0)&function(esk6_0))&((relation_rng(esk5_0)=relation_dom(esk6_0)&relation_composition(esk5_0,esk6_0)=esk5_0)&~(esk6_0=identity_relation(relation_dom(esk6_0)))))),inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[90])).
% cnf(92,negated_conjecture,(esk6_0!=identity_relation(relation_dom(esk6_0))),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[91])).
% cnf(93,negated_conjecture,(relation_composition(esk5_0,esk6_0)=esk5_0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[91])).
% cnf(94,negated_conjecture,(relation_rng(esk5_0)=relation_dom(esk6_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[91])).
% cnf(95,negated_conjecture,(function(esk6_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[91])).
% cnf(96,negated_conjecture,(relation(esk6_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[91])).
% cnf(97,negated_conjecture,(function(esk5_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[91])).
% cnf(98,negated_conjecture,(relation(esk5_0)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[91])).
% cnf(151,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk5_0,X1)=apply(esk6_0,apply(esk5_0,X1))|~in(X1,relation_dom(esk5_0))|~relation(esk6_0)|~relation(esk5_0)|~function(esk6_0)|~function(esk5_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[38,93,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(152,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk5_0,X1)=apply(esk6_0,apply(esk5_0,X1))|~in(X1,relation_dom(esk5_0))|$false|~relation(esk5_0)|~function(esk6_0)|~function(esk5_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[151,96,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(153,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk5_0,X1)=apply(esk6_0,apply(esk5_0,X1))|~in(X1,relation_dom(esk5_0))|$false|$false|~function(esk6_0)|~function(esk5_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[152,98,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(154,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk5_0,X1)=apply(esk6_0,apply(esk5_0,X1))|~in(X1,relation_dom(esk5_0))|$false|$false|$false|~function(esk5_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[153,95,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(155,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk5_0,X1)=apply(esk6_0,apply(esk5_0,X1))|~in(X1,relation_dom(esk5_0))|$false|$false|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[154,97,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(156,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk5_0,X1)=apply(esk6_0,apply(esk5_0,X1))|~in(X1,relation_dom(esk5_0))),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[155,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(474,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X2)=X2|~in(esk2_3(esk5_0,X1,X2),relation_dom(esk5_0))|relation_rng(esk5_0)!=X1|~in(X2,X1)|~relation(esk5_0)|~function(esk5_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[156,44,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(496,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X2)=X2|~in(esk2_3(esk5_0,X1,X2),relation_dom(esk5_0))|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1|~in(X2,X1)|~relation(esk5_0)|~function(esk5_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[474,94,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(497,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X2)=X2|~in(esk2_3(esk5_0,X1,X2),relation_dom(esk5_0))|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1|~in(X2,X1)|$false|~function(esk5_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[496,98,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(498,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X2)=X2|~in(esk2_3(esk5_0,X1,X2),relation_dom(esk5_0))|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1|~in(X2,X1)|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[497,97,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(499,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X2)=X2|~in(esk2_3(esk5_0,X1,X2),relation_dom(esk5_0))|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1|~in(X2,X1)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[498,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3975,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X1)=X1|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X2|~in(X1,X2)|relation_rng(esk5_0)!=X2|~relation(esk5_0)|~function(esk5_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[499,45,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3980,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X1)=X1|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X2|~in(X1,X2)|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X2|~relation(esk5_0)|~function(esk5_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3975,94,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3981,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X1)=X1|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X2|~in(X1,X2)|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X2|$false|~function(esk5_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3980,98,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3982,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X1)=X1|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X2|~in(X1,X2)|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X2|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[3981,97,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(3983,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,X1)=X1|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X2|~in(X1,X2)),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[3982,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(4028,negated_conjecture,(apply(esk6_0,esk1_2(X1,X2))=esk1_2(X1,X2)|identity_relation(X1)=X2|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1|relation_dom(X2)!=X1|~relation(X2)|~function(X2)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[3983,32,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(395750,negated_conjecture,(identity_relation(X1)=esk6_0|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1|~relation(esk6_0)|~function(esk6_0)),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[31,4028,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(395897,negated_conjecture,(identity_relation(X1)=esk6_0|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1|$false|~function(esk6_0)),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[395750,96,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(395898,negated_conjecture,(identity_relation(X1)=esk6_0|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1|$false|$false),inference(rw,[status(thm)],[395897,95,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(395899,negated_conjecture,(identity_relation(X1)=esk6_0|relation_dom(esk6_0)!=X1),inference(cn,[status(thm)],[395898,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(395920,negated_conjecture,($false),inference(spm,[status(thm)],[92,395899,theory(equality)])).
% cnf(396229,negated_conjecture,($false),395920,['proof']).
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% # Processed clauses : 10981
% # ...of these trivial : 6
% # ...subsumed : 9730
% # ...remaining for further processing: 1245
% # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1828
% # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% # Backward-subsumed : 40
% # Backward-rewritten : 0
% # Generated clauses : 337127
% # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 333988
% # Contextual simplify-reflections : 12853
% # Paramodulations : 335205
% # Factorizations : 0
% # Equation resolutions : 1922
% # Current number of processed clauses: 1171
% # Positive orientable unit clauses: 9
% # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% # Negative unit clauses : 5
% # Non-unit-clauses : 1157
% # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 322876
% # ...number of literals in the above : 2378802
% # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 626379
% # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 485643
% # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55
% # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite attempts : 0
% # Indexed BW rewrite successes : 0
% # Backwards rewriting index: 472 leaves, 2.89+/-5.043 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-from index: 99 leaves, 1.70+/-2.713 terms/leaf
% # Paramod-into index: 299 leaves, 2.42+/-3.806 terms/leaf
% # -------------------------------------------------
% # User time : 14.140 s
% # System time : 0.462 s
% # Total time : 14.602 s
% # Maximum resident set size: 0 pages
% PrfWatch: 21.03 CPU 21.28 WC
% FINAL PrfWatch: 21.03 CPU 21.28 WC
% SZS output end Solution for /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11788/SEU012+1.tptp
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------