TSTP Solution File: SET997+1 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SET997+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:13:54 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 8 unt; 1 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 4 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(5,axiom,
( subset(X,Y)
| in('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,Y),X) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).
cnf(6,axiom,
( subset(X,Y)
| ~ in('SKOLEMAAAV1'(X,Y),Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d3_tarski) ).
cnf(9,axiom,
( ~ relation(X)
| ~ function(X)
| Y != relation_rng(X)
| in(Z,Y)
| ~ in(U,relation_dom(X))
| Z != apply(X,U) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d5_funct_1) ).
cnf(37,negated_conjecture,
relation('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_funct_1) ).
cnf(38,negated_conjecture,
function('SKOLEMAAAV15'),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_funct_1) ).
cnf(39,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X,'SKOLEMAAAV14')
| in('SKOLEMAAAV16'(X),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV15')) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_funct_1) ).
cnf(40,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X,'SKOLEMAAAV14')
| X = apply('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'(X)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_funct_1) ).
cnf(41,negated_conjecture,
~ subset('SKOLEMAAAV14',relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t19_funct_1) ).
cnf(77,plain,
in('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV14',relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV15')),'SKOLEMAAAV14'),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[41,5]) ).
cnf(79,plain,
~ in('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV14',relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV15')),relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[6,41]) ).
cnf(210,plain,
in('SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV14',relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV15'))),relation_dom('SKOLEMAAAV15')),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[39,77]) ).
cnf(212,plain,
'SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV14',relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV15')) = apply('SKOLEMAAAV15','SKOLEMAAAV16'('SKOLEMAAAV1'('SKOLEMAAAV14',relation_rng('SKOLEMAAAV15')))),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[40,77]) ).
cnf(907,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[9,210,37,38,theory(equality),theory(equality)]),79,212,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SET997+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 19:31:40 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.50 *
% 0.21/0.50 *
% 0.21/0.51 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.21/0.51 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.21/0.51 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.21/0.51 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.21/0.51 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.21/0.51 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 "."
% 0.21/0.51 *
% 0.21/0.51 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T19:31:40
% 0.21/0.51 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n023.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T19:31:40
% 0.21/0.53 WARNING:
% 0.21/0.53 |relation_empty_yielding| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only positively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 #||
% 0.55/0.75 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.75 ||#
% 0.55/0.75
% 0.55/0.75 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.55/0.75 ; 2293 formulas have been input or derived (from 320 formulas).
% 0.55/0.75 ; 907 (40%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.55/0.75 ; 56 ( 6%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.55/0.75 ; 851 (94%) are still being kept.
% 0.55/0.75 ;
% 0.55/0.75 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.55/0.75 ; 0.006 3% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.55/0.75 ; 0.002 1% Assert (32 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.063 27% Process new row (1,949 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.080 34% Resolution (638 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.006 3% Paramodulation (319 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (7 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.001 0% Condensing (171 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.008 3% Forward subsumption (171 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.004 2% Backward subsumption (162 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.002 1% Clause clause subsumption (92 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.021 9% Forward simplification (1,903 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.008 3% Backward simplification (907 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (398 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.001 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.033 14% Other
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.235 Total
% 0.55/0.76 ; 0.250 Real time
% 0.55/0.76 ;
% 0.55/0.76 ; Term-hash-array has 1,370 terms in all.
% 0.55/0.76 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 149 entries (149 at peak, 162 added, 13 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 914 nodes (914 at peak, 1,032 added, 118 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76 ; Retrieved 104 possibly forward subsuming rows in 171 calls.
% 0.55/0.76 ; Retrieved 7 possibly backward subsumed rows in 162 calls.
% 0.55/0.76 ; Path-index has 1,313 entries (1,313 at peak, 1,406 added, 93 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76 ; Path-index has 2,005 nodes (2,005 at peak, 2,096 added, 91 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76 ; Trie-index has 1,313 entries (1,313 at peak, 1,406 added, 93 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76 ; Trie-index has 3,580 nodes (3,580 at peak, 3,820 added, 240 deleted).
% 0.55/0.76 ; Retrieved 1,654 generalization terms in 3,072 calls.
% 0.55/0.76 ; Retrieved 786 instance terms in 744 calls.
% 0.55/0.76 ; Retrieved 47,199 unifiable terms in 8,982 calls.
% 0.55/0.76 ;
% 0.55/0.76 ; The agenda of rows to process has 3 entries:
% 0.55/0.76 ; 2 with value 20 1 with value 24
% 0.55/0.76 ; The agenda of rows to give has 542 entries:
% 0.55/0.76 ; 71 with value (4 14) 48 with value (4 20) 2 with value (4 25)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 85 with value (4 15) 16 with value (4 21) 5 with value (4 26)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 82 with value (4 16) 19 with value (4 22) 5 with value (4 27)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 46 with value (4 17) 15 with value (4 23) 2 with value (4 28)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 68 with value (4 18) 16 with value (4 24) 1 with value (4 29)
% 0.55/0.76 ; 61 with value (4 19)
% 0.55/0.76 Evaluation took:
% 0.55/0.76 0.251 seconds of real time
% 0.55/0.76 0.216344 seconds of user run time
% 0.55/0.76 0.033065 seconds of system run time
% 0.55/0.76 [Run times include 0.013 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.55/0.76 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.55/0.76 0 page faults and
% 0.55/0.76 12,582,552 bytes consed.
% 0.55/0.76 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.55/0.76 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T19:31:41
% 0.55/0.76 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.55/0.76 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------