TSTP Solution File: SET997+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET997+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.26s 2.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 7 unt; 2 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 6 equ; 23 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_rng(X3)
| X1 != apply(X3,X4)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bsbogjvs/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_43,negated_conjecture,
( apply(esk15_0,esk16_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ in(X1,esk14_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bsbogjvs/lgb.p',i_0_43) ).
cnf(i_0_46,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk15_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bsbogjvs/lgb.p',i_0_46) ).
cnf(i_0_45,negated_conjecture,
function(esk15_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bsbogjvs/lgb.p',i_0_45) ).
cnf(i_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk16_1(X1),relation_dom(esk15_0))
| ~ in(X1,esk14_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bsbogjvs/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bsbogjvs/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_5,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bsbogjvs/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).
cnf(i_0_42,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk14_0,relation_rng(esk15_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bsbogjvs/lgb.p',i_0_42) ).
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( in(X1,X2)
| X2 != relation_rng(X3)
| X1 != apply(X3,X4)
| ~ function(X3)
| ~ relation(X3)
| ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_rng(X1))
| ~ relation(X1)
| ~ function(X1)
| ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_55])]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
( apply(esk15_0,esk16_1(X1)) = X1
| ~ in(X1,esk14_0) ),
i_0_43 ).
cnf(c_0_58,negated_conjecture,
relation(esk15_0),
i_0_46 ).
cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
function(esk15_0),
i_0_45 ).
cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
( in(esk16_1(X1),relation_dom(esk15_0))
| ~ in(X1,esk14_0) ),
i_0_44 ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_62,negated_conjecture,
( in(X1,relation_rng(esk15_0))
| ~ in(X1,esk14_0) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]),c_0_58]),c_0_59])]),c_0_60]) ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( subset(X1,relation_rng(esk15_0))
| ~ in(esk1_2(X1,relation_rng(esk15_0)),esk14_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( subset(X1,X2)
| in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
i_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
~ subset(esk14_0,relation_rng(esk15_0)),
i_0_42 ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_65]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET997+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 19:16:58 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.26/2.35 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.26/2.35 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.26/2.35 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.26/2.35 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.26/2.35 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.26/2.35 #
% 7.26/2.35 # Preprocessing time : 0.024 s
% 7.26/2.35 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.26/2.35
% 7.26/2.35 # Proof found!
% 7.26/2.35 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.26/2.35 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.26/2.36 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.26/2.36
% 7.26/2.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.26/2.36 # User time : 0.024 s
% 7.26/2.36 # System time : 0.009 s
% 7.26/2.36 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 7.26/2.36 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.26/2.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------