TSTP Solution File: SET992+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : SET992+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.24s 2.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  13 unt;   3 nHn;  33 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   96 (  40 equ;  55 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk14_0) = relation_dom(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(i_0_13,plain,
    ( in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(i_0_12,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(i_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_11,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | X1 != apply(X3,X4)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_6,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X3
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( X1 = singleton(X2)
    | esk1_2(X2,X1) = X2
    | in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(apply(esk15_0,esk14_0)) != relation_rng(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    ( X1 = singleton(X2)
    | esk1_2(X2,X1) != X2
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3i_d2w08/lgb.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 != singleton(X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ in(X1,singleton(X2)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(esk14_0) = relation_dom(esk15_0),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    ( in(esk2_3(X1,X2,X3),relation_dom(X1))
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk2_3(X1,X2,X3)) = X3
    | X2 != relation_rng(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,X2) ),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_64,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 = esk14_0
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    ( in(esk2_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2),relation_dom(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    relation(esk15_0),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_67,negated_conjecture,
    function(esk15_0),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_68,plain,
    ( apply(X1,esk2_3(X1,relation_rng(X1),X2)) = X2
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_rng(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_63]) ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( esk2_3(esk15_0,relation_rng(esk15_0),X1) = esk14_0
    | ~ in(X1,relation_rng(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]),c_0_66]),c_0_67])]) ).

cnf(c_0_70,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X2 != relation_rng(X3)
    | X1 != apply(X3,X4)
    | ~ function(X3)
    | ~ relation(X3)
    | ~ in(X4,relation_dom(X3)) ),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( apply(esk15_0,esk14_0) = X1
    | ~ in(X1,relation_rng(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_69]),c_0_66]),c_0_67])]) ).

cnf(c_0_72,plain,
    ( in(apply(X1,X2),relation_rng(X1))
    | ~ relation(X1)
    | ~ function(X1)
    | ~ in(X2,relation_dom(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_70])]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    ( in(X1,X2)
    | X1 != X3
    | X2 != singleton(X3) ),
    i_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( X1 = singleton(X2)
    | esk1_2(X2,X1) = X2
    | in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X1) ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( apply(esk15_0,esk14_0) = apply(esk15_0,X1)
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]),c_0_66]),c_0_67])]) ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    in(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_73])]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ( esk1_2(X1,relation_rng(esk15_0)) = apply(esk15_0,esk14_0)
    | esk1_2(X1,relation_rng(esk15_0)) = X1
    | singleton(X1) = relation_rng(esk15_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(apply(esk15_0,esk14_0)) != relation_rng(esk15_0),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( in(apply(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(esk15_0))
    | ~ in(X1,relation_dom(esk15_0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_75]),c_0_66]),c_0_67])]) ).

cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
    in(esk14_0,relation_dom(esk15_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_61]) ).

cnf(c_0_81,plain,
    ( X1 = singleton(X2)
    | esk1_2(X2,X1) != X2
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X2,X1),X1) ),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    esk1_2(apply(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(esk15_0)) = apply(esk15_0,esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_77])]),c_0_78]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    in(apply(esk15_0,esk14_0),relation_rng(esk15_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]) ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]),c_0_83])]),c_0_78]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : SET992+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 05:45:43 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.24/2.25  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.24/2.25  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.24/2.25  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.24/2.25  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.24/2.25  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.24/2.25  #
% 7.24/2.25  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 7.24/2.25  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.24/2.25  
% 7.24/2.25  # Proof found!
% 7.24/2.25  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.24/2.25  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.24/2.25  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.24/2.25  
% 7.24/2.25  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.24/2.25  # User time                : 0.033 s
% 7.24/2.25  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 7.24/2.25  # Total time               : 0.039 s
% 7.24/2.25  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.24/2.25  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------