TSTP Solution File: SET979+1 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 03:14:10 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.56s 0.74s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (   9 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  389 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (  13 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   44 (  22   ~;  15   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of FOOLs       :  338 ( 338 fml;   0 var)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    2 (   1   >;   1   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   12 (  10 usr;   6 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (  31   !;   6   ?;  21   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_2,type,
    sQ3_eqProxy: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).

tff(f55,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f46,f50,f53]) ).

tff(f53,plain,
    spl4_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f52]) ).

tff(f52,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f51,f31]) ).

tff(f31,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] : sQ3_eqProxy($i,cartesian_product2(X2,set_union2(X0,X1)),set_union2(cartesian_product2(X2,X0),cartesian_product2(X2,X1))),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f21,f29]) ).

tff(f29,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
      ( sQ3_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2)
    <=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ3_eqProxy])]) ).

tff(f21,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( cartesian_product2(X2,set_union2(X0,X1)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X2,X0),cartesian_product2(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( cartesian_product2(X2,set_union2(X0,X1)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X2,X0),cartesian_product2(X2,X1)) )
      & ( cartesian_product2(set_union2(X0,X1),X2) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X0,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t120_zfmisc_1) ).

tff(f51,plain,
    ( ~ sQ3_eqProxy($i,cartesian_product2(sK2,set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1))),set_union2(cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK0)),cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK1))))
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(forward_literal_rewriting,[],[f45,f37]) ).

tff(f37,plain,
    ! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
      ( sQ3_eqProxy(X0,X2,X1)
      | ~ sQ3_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_axiom,[],[f29]) ).

tff(f45,plain,
    ( ~ sQ3_eqProxy($i,set_union2(cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK0)),cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK1))),cartesian_product2(sK2,set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1))))
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f43]) ).

tff(f43,plain,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> sQ3_eqProxy($i,set_union2(cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK0)),cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK1))),cartesian_product2(sK2,set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1)))) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_2])]) ).

tff(f50,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f49]) ).

tff(f49,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f32,f47]) ).

tff(f47,plain,
    ( ~ sQ3_eqProxy($i,cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1)),sK2),set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(sK0),sK2),cartesian_product2(singleton(sK1),sK2)))
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f37,f41]) ).

tff(f41,plain,
    ( ~ sQ3_eqProxy($i,set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(sK0),sK2),cartesian_product2(singleton(sK1),sK2)),cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1)),sK2))
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f39]) ).

tff(f39,plain,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> sQ3_eqProxy($i,set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(sK0),sK2),cartesian_product2(singleton(sK1),sK2)),cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1)),sK2)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl4_1])]) ).

tff(f32,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] : sQ3_eqProxy($i,cartesian_product2(set_union2(X0,X1),X2),set_union2(cartesian_product2(X0,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X2))),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f20,f29]) ).

tff(f20,plain,
    ! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( cartesian_product2(set_union2(X0,X1),X2) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X0,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tff(f46,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f30,f43,f39]) ).

tff(f30,plain,
    ( ~ sQ3_eqProxy($i,set_union2(cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK0)),cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK1))),cartesian_product2(sK2,set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1))))
    | ~ sQ3_eqProxy($i,set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(sK0),sK2),cartesian_product2(singleton(sK1),sK2)),cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1)),sK2)) ),
    inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f27,f29]) ).

tff(f27,plain,
    ( ( set_union2(cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK0)),cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK1))) != cartesian_product2(sK2,set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1))) )
    | ( set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(sK0),sK2),cartesian_product2(singleton(sK1),sK2)) != cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(sK0),singleton(sK1)),sK2) ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f18,f19,f19]) ).

tff(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = set_union2(singleton(X0),singleton(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tff(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ( unordered_pair(X0,X1) = set_union2(singleton(X0),singleton(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t41_enumset1) ).

tff(f18,plain,
    ( ( cartesian_product2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK0)),cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK1))) )
    | ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(sK0),sK2),cartesian_product2(singleton(sK1),sK2)) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

tff(f17,plain,
    ( ( cartesian_product2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK0)),cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK1))) )
    | ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(sK0),sK2),cartesian_product2(singleton(sK1),sK2)) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f13,f16]) ).

tff(f16,plain,
    ( ? [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( cartesian_product2(X2,unordered_pair(X0,X1)) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X0)),cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X1))) )
        | ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(X0),X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X2)) ) )
   => ( ( cartesian_product2(sK2,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK0)),cartesian_product2(sK2,singleton(sK1))) )
      | ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),sK2) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(sK0),sK2),cartesian_product2(singleton(sK1),sK2)) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

tff(f13,plain,
    ? [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( cartesian_product2(X2,unordered_pair(X0,X1)) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X0)),cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X1))) )
      | ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(X0),X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X2)) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tff(f10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0,X1,X2] :
        ( ( cartesian_product2(X2,unordered_pair(X0,X1)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X0)),cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X1))) )
        & ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(X0),X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X2)) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f9]) ).

tff(f9,conjecture,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( cartesian_product2(X2,unordered_pair(X0,X1)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X0)),cartesian_product2(X2,singleton(X1))) )
      & ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(X0,X1),X2) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(X0),X2),cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X2)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t132_zfmisc_1) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 11:24:08 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.11/0.33  This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.11/0.33  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.74  % (2466)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2464)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2468)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)First to succeed.
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (2470)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)Memory used [KB]: 955
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2469)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2464)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2470)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-2462"
% 0.56/0.74  % (2469)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.56/0.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.56/0.74  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)------------------------------
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.56/0.74  
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)Memory used [KB]: 987
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.56/0.74  % (2463)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.56/0.74  % (2462)Success in time 0.406 s
% 0.56/0.74  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------