TSTP Solution File: SET979+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:15:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.52s 2.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 10 ( 9 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk3_0)),cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0))) != cartesian_product2(esk5_0,set_union2(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0)))
| set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(esk3_0),esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0)) != cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk5_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f13sl7j0/lgb.p',i_0_10) ).
cnf(i_0_8,plain,
set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X3)) = cartesian_product2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f13sl7j0/lgb.p',i_0_8) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X2)) = cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X3),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-f13sl7j0/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk3_0)),cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0))) != cartesian_product2(esk5_0,set_union2(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0)))
| set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(esk3_0),esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0)) != cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk5_0) ),
i_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X3)) = cartesian_product2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),
i_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(esk3_0),esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0)) != cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk5_0),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X3,X2)) = cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X3),X2),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jul 9 21:08:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.52/2.35 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.52/2.35 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.52/2.35 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.52/2.35 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.52/2.35 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.52/2.35 #
% 7.52/2.35 # Preprocessing time : 0.023 s
% 7.52/2.35 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.52/2.35
% 7.52/2.35 # Proof found!
% 7.52/2.35 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.52/2.35 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.52/2.35 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.52/2.35
% 7.52/2.35 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.52/2.35 # User time : 0.025 s
% 7.52/2.35 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.52/2.35 # Total time : 0.029 s
% 7.52/2.35 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.52/2.35
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------