TSTP Solution File: SET979+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:36:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   6 unt;  10 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   7   ~;   3   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    8 (   5   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn;  16   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    unordered_pair: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    set_union2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    empty: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    singleton: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk1_0: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk3_0: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    esk4_0: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    esk5_0: $i ).

fof(t132_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X3),cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X3))
      & cartesian_product2(X3,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t132_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(t41_enumset1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : unordered_pair(X1,X2) = set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t41_enumset1) ).

fof(t120_zfmisc_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
      & cartesian_product2(X3,set_union2(X1,X2)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X3,X1),cartesian_product2(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t120_zfmisc_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] :
        ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(X1),X3),cartesian_product2(singleton(X2),X3))
        & cartesian_product2(X3,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X1)),cartesian_product2(X3,singleton(X2))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t132_zfmisc_1]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(esk3_0),esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0))
    | cartesian_product2(esk5_0,unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk3_0)),cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0))) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] : unordered_pair(X21,X22) = set_union2(singleton(X21),singleton(X22)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t41_enumset1]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( cartesian_product2(unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(esk3_0),esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0))
    | cartesian_product2(esk5_0,unordered_pair(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk3_0)),cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    unordered_pair(X1,X2) = set_union2(singleton(X1),singleton(X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17] :
      ( cartesian_product2(set_union2(X15,X16),X17) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X15,X17),cartesian_product2(X16,X17))
      & cartesian_product2(X17,set_union2(X15,X16)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X17,X15),cartesian_product2(X17,X16)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t120_zfmisc_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( cartesian_product2(esk5_0,set_union2(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0))) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk3_0)),cartesian_product2(esk5_0,singleton(esk4_0)))
    | cartesian_product2(set_union2(singleton(esk3_0),singleton(esk4_0)),esk5_0) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(singleton(esk3_0),esk5_0),cartesian_product2(singleton(esk4_0),esk5_0)) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    cartesian_product2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : SET979+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat Aug 26 09:31:55 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.57  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.58  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.21/0.58  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.58  % Proof found
% 0.21/0.58  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.58  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.58  % Total time : 0.004000 s
% 0.21/0.58  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.58  % Total time : 0.007000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------