TSTP Solution File: SET968+1 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : SET968+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 14:36:28 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 17 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 20 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 7 ( 5 ~; 0 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 3 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 0 sgn; 24 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
set_union2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
empty: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
cartesian_product2: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
esk1_0: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
esk2_0: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
esk3_0: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
esk4_0: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
esk5_0: $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
esk6_0: $i ).
fof(t121_zfmisc_1,conjecture,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] : cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X3,X4)) = set_union2(set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X1,X4)),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)),cartesian_product2(X2,X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t121_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(commutativity_k2_xboole_0,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_k2_xboole_0) ).
fof(t4_xboole_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] : set_union2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_xboole_1) ).
fof(t120_zfmisc_1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,X3))
& cartesian_product2(X3,set_union2(X1,X2)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X3,X1),cartesian_product2(X3,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t120_zfmisc_1) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] : cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),set_union2(X3,X4)) = set_union2(set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X1,X4)),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)),cartesian_product2(X2,X4)),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t121_zfmisc_1]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
cartesian_product2(set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != set_union2(set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0)),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0)),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk6_0)),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X5,X6] : set_union2(X5,X6) = set_union2(X6,X5),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_k2_xboole_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
cartesian_product2(set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != set_union2(set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0)),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0)),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk6_0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23] : set_union2(set_union2(X21,X22),X23) = set_union2(X21,set_union2(X22,X23)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t4_xboole_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
cartesian_product2(set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != set_union2(set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0),set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0))),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk6_0)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
set_union2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X14,X15,X16] :
( cartesian_product2(set_union2(X14,X15),X16) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X14,X16),cartesian_product2(X15,X16))
& cartesian_product2(X16,set_union2(X14,X15)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X16,X14),cartesian_product2(X16,X15)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t120_zfmisc_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
cartesian_product2(set_union2(esk3_0,esk4_0),set_union2(esk5_0,esk6_0)) != set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk5_0),set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk5_0),set_union2(cartesian_product2(esk3_0,esk6_0),cartesian_product2(esk4_0,esk6_0)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
cartesian_product2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X2),cartesian_product2(X1,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
cartesian_product2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(cartesian_product2(X1,X3),cartesian_product2(X2,X3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
set_union2(X1,X2) = set_union2(X2,X1),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
set_union2(set_union2(X1,X2),X3) = set_union2(X1,set_union2(X2,X3)),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(ar,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_11]),c_0_16,c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : SET968+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.10/0.29 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.29 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.29 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.29 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.29 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 15:06:14 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.46 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.47 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.14/0.47 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.47 % Proof found
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.48 % Total time : 0.004000 s
% 0.14/0.48 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.14/0.48 % Total time : 0.006000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------